Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 16,328
- 28,970
- 2,430
~~~~~~It's apparent the whole deep state apparatus is out to protect Hunter. Such a travesty. What happened to the Whistleblower protections Adam Schiff would scream about?
A SECOND Hunter Biden IRS Whistleblower Emerges After Being Fired - Biden Regime Threatens to Criminally Prosecute Whistleblower | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that an IRS whistleblower came forward to allege the Biden regime was mishandling the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden and giving him special treatment.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Second Hunter Biden IRS whistleblower emerges after dismissal despite five years on case
The existence of a second IRS whistleblower in the criminal investigation of first son Hunter Biden emerged Monday in documents sent to Congress following the purge of the entire investigatory team…nypost.com
IRS Whistleblower Alleges ‘Conflicts Of Interest’
In Biden DOJ’s Investigation Of Hunter
IRS Whistleblower Alleges ‘Conflicts Of Interest’ In Biden DOJ’s Investigation Of Hunter
An IRS whistleblower has reportedly told Congress that the Biden admin's investigation into Hunter Biden's taxes are mired with "clear conflicts of interest."
dailycaller.com
An Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblower has reportedly told Congress that the Biden administration’s ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden’s taxes are mired with “clear conflicts of interest,” according to a letter obtained by both The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post.
The whistleblower — an IRS supervisor — alleges that he has overseen an “ongoing and sensitive investigation of a high-profile, controversial subject since early 2020,” which people familiar with the matter say is the ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden’s alleged failure to pay taxes and making false statements on a federal firearms application, according to the WSJ. The supervisor alleges that they are aware of information that contradicts the sworn testimony of a “senior political appointee” and that demonstrates “failure to mitigate clear conflicts of interest” in the Justice Department’s handling of the case.
