A SECOND whistle-blower in Trump's tarnished future....

The NEW definition of whistleblower... anyone who wants to accuse someone anonymously.


Look up the fucking Whistle Blower LAW...and see how damn rigorous it is, and why someone risks his or her job (and with the orange turd, one's life) to report a scandal.
 
Just like the Democrat's Antifa mass-shooters.....they're copy-cats.
A second complaint isn't proof of wrongdoing by Trump....but just an attempt by Democrats to make the first mudwhistlblower seem sort of legit.


upload_2019-10-1_16-45-16.jpeg
 
It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost
A second whistleblower! Wow! Now they can make harmony on their skin flutes given to them by DNC!
 
. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl. :auiqs.jpg:


OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?
 
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING.


Well, yes....an idiot like you WOULD say the above........Get it through your fucking half brain:

TRUMP IS CORRUPT...and THAT is why all this crap is floating to the top.

Stop the damn excuses and face it like an American citizen.
 
It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost

What is this?
A 2-mints-in-one deep state setup?
 
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING.


Well, yes....an idiot like you WOULD say the above........Get it through your fucking half brain:

TRUMP IS CORRUPT...and THAT is why all this crap is floating to the top.

Stop the damn excuses and face it like an American citizen.

The ends justify the means.....

Because the left knows best.
 
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING.


Well, yes....an idiot like you WOULD say the above........Get it through your fucking half brain:

TRUMP IS CORRUPT...and THAT is why all this crap is floating to the top.

Stop the damn excuses and face it like an American citizen.

He must be smart.

You said he'd lose: He didn't.
You said he'd be impeached in a year: Nope.
You say he is corrupt.......: No proof yet.
 
It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost
Was it BALSEY-FORD....ENQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW!!!....THEY CONTINUE!!!!...ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes.....perhaps they can find someone who knows about Trump trying to dig up dirt on someone 35 years ago.
 
It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost
Lol we don’t care.. go blow all your whistles lol have fun lol
 
. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl. :auiqs.jpg:
They were.
 
. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl. :auiqs.jpg:


OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?
Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.
 
. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl. :auiqs.jpg:


OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?
Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

Boy...you said it.

The left has never worked from first, second, or third hand knowledge.

In fact, most of the time they work from no knowledge.
 
think about how many book deals are waiting -

Trump has been this fucked up for decades, and did a lot of shit.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl. :auiqs.jpg:


OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?
Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

Boy...you said it.

The left has never worked from first, second, or third hand knowledge.

In fact, most of the time they work from no knowledge.
The whistle blower act has never required it be first hand. It is that simple, and neither left nor right.
 
. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl. :auiqs.jpg:


OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.
It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?
Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

corroboration being the key word in whistleblower cases -
 

Forum List

Back
Top