Mac1958
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Again, I don't know what this has to do with the thread.Do you?I don't know what any of that has to do with my point: Behaviors. The willingness of both ends to behave as they are.There are many Americans who are not paralyzed by a partisan ideology. We have our views, we like this politician more than the other, we vote that way, but what we really want is things to go as well as possible, as often as possible. Even if it's not the way we would have chosen. We don't care who gets the credit politically.
What we're seeing now is clearly (a) a White House in crisis, primarily internally and as it operates under threat of a deep, broad federal investigation that could expose or destroy not just the President and various staff members, but members of his family. Proponents of the White House are, predictably, defending the President. Fine. But this is clearly not good. For the country.
Equally troubling to those of us who are hoping for the best regardless of who gets credit is the behavior of those who are clearly in joyous celebration of what is happening. As we see here on USMB, it's thread after thread of his opponents dancing on (what they suspect and hope is) his grave. A White House is in crisis, and there are Americans who are obviously overjoyed and reveling in the disaster.
This is why so many of us choose not to ideology affix ourselves to a party. We may share many opinions with one or the other, but we refuse to behave like this. It's now officially party over country, and it's ugly. We want no part of this.
.
I think your POV is much too informed by the MSM on TV and in CFR controlled papers.
The whole system is corrupt, and the clandestine Intel agencies have become partisan.
Where once, both parties were controlled by the global elites, these elites are now aging and their successors are in disagreement as to which direction the nation should head. This has led to a destructive power struggle among the autocrats.
This, with the added new technology influx which blossomed as of 1994, the populace has become increasingly aware of the true situation they are in.
For a nice independent review from the conservatives POV out of Canada;
FBI Continues Satanic Dance with some old and some new players
"Despite the fact that the FBI was contacted at least 2 and possibly 3 times about this extremely disturbed and dangerous individualâŠno one at the FBI did anything. Thatâs so far from irrational that it bears close and deep scrutiny. However, in my opinion, the obvious isâagainâthis slaughter was allowed to happen. This was a warning shot to us all. This time, however, it was not over the bow. This is what desperate individuals in 3rd world countries do when extreme fear sets into the autocrats. Theyâre saying, in essence, âDonât mess with us and our plans to run your country the way we want.â
I have written multiple columns about the Mueller spurious-if-not-fraudulent investigation for quite awhile andâearly onâpresented evidence of Muellerâs own questionable and openly criminal behaviors exhibited under the color of law. His ongoing âinvestigationâ of President Trump, which is based upon previously identified and corroborated false evidence, is but his latest endeavor into the realm of making up crimes that are non-existent and using fake information to do so. Mueller has been involved in myriad other questionable if not criminal exercises; not the least of which is his involvement in the Uranium One affair. Muellerâas did Comeyâworked to protect Hillary Clinton. See âMueller and the US âCorruptocracyâ below. During Clintonâs âWhitewaterâ affair, James Comey protected Hillary in almost the exact way as he did when he refused to file charges against her for her âEmail-gateâ scandal.
Excerpt from the piece referenced above: âThen there was Whitewater, which was a fraudulent scheme to bilk huge amounts of money from investors. Incidentally, Hillaryâs buddy FBI Director James Comey was around then, too. At that time, he was Deputy Special Council on the Senate Whitewater Committee. AndâŠguess what? He said almost the same things about her behavior thenâŠas he did recently about her cavalier treatment of Top Secret US documents. During the Whitewater scandal, Comey, also, proceeded to refuse to recommend prosecution of Hillary even though she was clearly guilty.â During the Whitewater whitewash, Comey said that she âdidnât have the intent to defraud.â Comey said of Hillary Clintonâs illegal actions surrounding her email matters and those with whom she was communicating: âWe could not prove that the people sending the information, either in that case or the other case with the secretary, were acting with any kind of mens rea, with any kind of criminal intent.â
Note: âIntentâ is not even a consideration, in these areas. Yet, Comey and others have gotten away with this sort of subterfuge and sleight of hand for yearsâŠand yearsâŠwith no one calling them out on itâŠuntil the courageous California Congressman and one of our applauded champions Rep. Devin Nunes stepped into the fray."
FBI Continues Satanic Dance with some old and some new players
And a clear picture from the progressive left, from award wining investigation right here in the states;
Nunes: FBI and DOJ Perps Could Be Put on Trial
"Staying Power
On the other hand, the presumptive perps have not run into a chairman like Nunes in four decades, since Congressmen Lucien Nedzi (D-Mich.), Otis Pike (D-NY), and Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) ran tough, explosive hearings on the abuses of a previous generation deep state, including massive domestic spying revealed by quintessential investigative reporter Seymour Hersh in December 1974. (Actually, this is largely why the congressional intelligence oversight committees were later established, and why the FISA law was passed in 1978.)
At this point, one is tempted to say plus ça change, plus câest la mĂȘme chose â or the more things change, the more they stay the same â but that would be only half correct in this context. Yes, scoundrels will always take liberties with the law to spy on others. But the huge difference today is that mainstream media have no room for those who uncover government crimes and abuse. And this will be a major impediment to efforts by Nunes and other committee chairs to inform the public.
One glaring sign of the mediaâs unwillingness to displease corporate masters and Official Washington is the harsh reality that Hershâs most recent explosive investigations, using his large array of government sources to explore front-burner issues, have not been able to find a home in any English-speaking newspaper or journal. In a sense, this provides what might be called a âconfidence-buildingâ factor, giving some assurance to deep-state perps that they will be able to ride this out, and that congressional committee chairs will once again learn to know their (subservient) place.
Much will depend on whether top DOJ and FBI officials can bring themselves to reverse course and give priority to the oath they took to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. This should not be too much to hope for, but it will require uncommon courage in facing up honestly to the major misdeeds appear to have occurred â and letting the chips fall where they may. Besides, it would be the right thing to do.
Nunes is projecting calm confidence that once he and Trey Gowdey (R-Tenn.), chair of the House Oversight Committee, release documentary evidence showing what their investigations have turned up, it will be hard for DOJ and FBI officials to dissimulate.
In Other News âŠ
In the interview with Attkisson, Nunes covered a number of other significant issues:
- The committee is closing down its investigation into possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign; no evidence of collusion was found.
- The apparently widespread practice of âunmaskingâ the identities of Americans under surveillance. On this point, Nunes said, âIn the last administration they were unmasking hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds of Americansâ names. They were unmasking for what I would say, for lack of a better definition, were for political purposes.â
- Asked about Schiffâs criticism that Nunes behaved improperly on what he called the âmidnight run to the White House,â Nunes responded that the stories were untrue. âWell, most of the time I ignore political nonsense in this town,â he said. âWhat I will say is that all of those stories were totally fake from the beginning.â
Not since Watergate has there been so high a degree of political tension here in Washington but the stakes for our Republic are even higher this time. Assuming abuse of FISA court procedures is documented and those responsible for playing fast and loose with the required justification for legal warrants are not held to account, the division of powers enshrined in the Constitution will be in peril.
A denouement of some kind can be expected in the coming months. Stay tuned."
Nunes: FBI and DOJ Perps Could Be Put on Trial
Personally, I'd be fascinated in the Hersch investigation. He usually does pretty good work. I had a very good idea what the Benghazi affair was all about a year before it broke because of his article in the London Review of Books.
However, if even THEY aren't willing to publish is work on this topic, you know we are in a bit of trouble.
And having been in the business for 18 years in a former life, I know precisely how the media operates.
.
âDeep Stateâ Veterans find New Homes in Mainstream Media
âDeep Stateâ Veterans find New Homes in Mainstream Media
.