Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are suggesting the Democrats act to uncover the actual truth...
Jan. 6 panel shows evidence of coordination between far-right groups and Trump allies
The committee showed video clips and text messages to demonstrate how far-right groups were emboldened by Trump's false claims about the 2020 election.www.npr.org
Well, no. Four anonymous people did not speak for the FBI. Your own link says those anonymous people claimd they hadn't found any evidence of coordination "at that point". Since then there has been testimony by participants that proves there was coordination between a wide range of people, including members of trump's inner circle. I expect you to continue to make your false claim, but it is a lie, and now you know it is a lie.
www.theblaze.com
Donna Brazile the woman who admitted that she gave Hillary Clinton the debate question. Show her ass when you rebukes Christie for calling out the credibility off the democrat witch hunt.Christie lays it out. The committee is a kangaroo court:
Former Gov. Chris Christie created a firestorm on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, with what he had to say about the Jan. 6 Committee. Christie pointed out that, to many Republicans, the Committee doesn’t have any credibility. That’s because they don’t have any real Republicans on the Committee to make any points against the Democratic narrative.The January 6 committee was “resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done,” Christie opened by saying.“There are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, there’s nobody there to argue the other side. Kinzinger and Cheney don’t argue the other side to the extent that there is [sic] some arguments there,” Christie added before both anchor George Stephanopoulos and Brazile jumped down his throat.That comment sparked outrage from host George Stephanopoulos and fellow panelist Donna Brazile, both of whom have been Democratic operatives....Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?” Christie spoke about the ability to grill the witnesses, something they would normally have at a hearing, which is missing here. Instead, he said, accurately, it was a television production. Brazile just kept shouting at Christie and would barely let him get in a word edgewise.When he finally got the chance to speak, Christie said, “There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn’t have memories about them before.” But, the Trump team/Republicans weren’t given that option because that’s not allowed, to challenge the narrative. You’re not allowed to know that Trump spoke about acting “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally before the riot. You’re not allowed to question why Democrats didn’t conduct this like a normal hearing.But this is the Democrats’ view in general. Trump is guilty of pushing an “insurrection”–because they say so. He isn’t entitled to a defense. It doesn’t matter what he said, or what evidence might rebut their presumptions. They don’t believe in the rule of law, just the rule of the narrative. That’s why everyone on the Committee — including the Republicans — was already solidly anti-Trump, picked for their bias. That’s why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in an unprecedented move, rejected members who were picked by the Republican side who might have questioned the Democrats.The last person who should be talking about “credibility” is Donna Brazile. Can anyone forget how Brazile divulged debate questions to Clinton camp officials during the Democratic primaries in the 2016 race? Even the left excoriated her...But Christie accurately noted it’s because of that basic unfairness about the formation of the Committee, that most of America have turned the Committee off. They know it’s about trying to get Trump, not about the riot or the rule of law.“t’s very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses, those things are things that are affecting people’s everyday lives and they don’t see it that way,” Christie reasoned.
That’s the bottom line. Democrats are pushing issues that aren’t the top issues of concern to voters. They thought they would use Jan. 6 to smear Republicans. But people know it’s a biased show; it’s backfiring on them because voters don’t think they care about anything else, including the issues that are most important to Americans.
Revenge is often a tactic for supporters of dictators.
NopeIsn’t the reason there are no “real” Republicans on the committee because they refused to join? Their complaints ring hollow.
Like the fake impeachment.Revenge is often a tactic for supporters of dictators.
Not during his speech that day, but certainly in all the planning and coordination with the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, 3 Percenters, and all the other mlitarized groups that planned and participated in the insurrection. Even the ones found guilty said they were doing it at the ex-prsident's behest. Yes, trump told them to storm the captol. .
J6 Reichstag FireChristie lays it out. The committee is a kangaroo court:
Former Gov. Chris Christie created a firestorm on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, with what he had to say about the Jan. 6 Committee. Christie pointed out that, to many Republicans, the Committee doesn’t have any credibility. That’s because they don’t have any real Republicans on the Committee to make any points against the Democratic narrative.The January 6 committee was “resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done,” Christie opened by saying.“There are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, there’s nobody there to argue the other side. Kinzinger and Cheney don’t argue the other side to the extent that there is [sic] some arguments there,” Christie added before both anchor George Stephanopoulos and Brazile jumped down his throat.That comment sparked outrage from host George Stephanopoulos and fellow panelist Donna Brazile, both of whom have been Democratic operatives....Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?” Christie spoke about the ability to grill the witnesses, something they would normally have at a hearing, which is missing here. Instead, he said, accurately, it was a television production. Brazile just kept shouting at Christie and would barely let him get in a word edgewise.When he finally got the chance to speak, Christie said, “There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn’t have memories about them before.” But, the Trump team/Republicans weren’t given that option because that’s not allowed, to challenge the narrative. You’re not allowed to know that Trump spoke about acting “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally before the riot. You’re not allowed to question why Democrats didn’t conduct this like a normal hearing.But this is the Democrats’ view in general. Trump is guilty of pushing an “insurrection”–because they say so. He isn’t entitled to a defense. It doesn’t matter what he said, or what evidence might rebut their presumptions. They don’t believe in the rule of law, just the rule of the narrative. That’s why everyone on the Committee — including the Republicans — was already solidly anti-Trump, picked for their bias. That’s why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in an unprecedented move, rejected members who were picked by the Republican side who might have questioned the Democrats.The last person who should be talking about “credibility” is Donna Brazile. Can anyone forget how Brazile divulged debate questions to Clinton camp officials during the Democratic primaries in the 2016 race? Even the left excoriated her...But Christie accurately noted it’s because of that basic unfairness about the formation of the Committee, that most of America have turned the Committee off. They know it’s about trying to get Trump, not about the riot or the rule of law.“t’s very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses, those things are things that are affecting people’s everyday lives and they don’t see it that way,” Christie reasoned.
That’s the bottom line. Democrats are pushing issues that aren’t the top issues of concern to voters. They thought they would use Jan. 6 to smear Republicans. But people know it’s a biased show; it’s backfiring on them because voters don’t think they care about anything else, including the issues that are most important to Americans.
Isn’t the reason there are no “real” Republicans on the committee because they refused to join? Their complaints ring hollow.
Again, an anonymous former senior law enforcement official doesn't speak for the FBI.FBI has no evidence Jan. 6 riot was organized, coordinated, or otherwise planned by Trump or others: Report | Blaze Media
The FBI has turned up no evidence that the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol was a coordinated attempt to launch an insurrection against the United States government by overturning the results of the presidential election, according to officials who spoke to Reuters Friday. "The FBI at this...
And to everything Chris Christie said, the appropriate response is "bullshit".
Especial that "peacefully" horseshit. Trump said to "march peacefully" to the Capital, and to "fight like hell" when they got there. And he told them to "fight" more than 10 times, so don't try that crap on people who watched the actual speech and heard send those people to the Capital to fight for his presidency, even though he lost the election.
Chris Christie has been a Trump ass=kisser since he pulled out of the primaries.
The FBI has no credibilityAgain, an anonymous former senior law enforcement official doesn't speak for the FBI.
Again, an anonymous former senior law enforcement official doesn't speak for the FBI.
Now that's funny, I don't care who you are. A crazy MAGA lnks an article where some anonymous person says the FBI has determined there was no connection between the WH or any of the crazy miltia groups. I point out it was an anonymous person and not the FBI. as a response you say the FBI isn't credible anyway.The FBI has no credibility
You would accept that if he was crapping on Trump.Again, an anonymous former senior law enforcement official doesn't speak for the FBI.
It's not funny. The FBI lost all credibility starting with lying to the FISA courts.Now that's funny, I don't care who you are. A crazy MAGA lnks an article where some anonymous person says the FBI has determined there was no connection between the WH or any of the crazy miltia groups. I point out it was an anonymous person and not the FBI. as a response you say the FBI isn't credible anyway.
You MAGAs seem confused.
It started with Ruby Ridge and Waco.It's not funny. The FBI lost all credibility starting with lying to the FISA courts.
It started with William Randolph Hearst and Harry Anslinger.It started with Ruby Ridge and Waco.
Questionable actsIt started with Ruby Ridge and Waco.
