ABC, Sinclair anchor, "I'm going to ram a hot poker up David Hoggs ass"

[Witchit]

The idiot used violent pornographic imagery in response to an underage boy. A grown man with a TV news job and the public platform that comes with it, and this is how he expresses his views.

Regardless of whether he was speaking figuratively or literally it was a bonehead and entirely inappropriate public remark.

And if you need to gave that explained to you, you’re not terribly bright yourself.

You don't get to demand that Hogg's words be treated with respect and then use the "Child" card to demand that he not be treated with the same level of hardball that he has been happy to dish out.


And it is not pornographic. If you find the idea of impalement on red hot irons to be sexual, that is on you.


TO the rest of us, it is a violent metaphor, and somewhat vulgar. But it was a comment on social media, not public airways.


You are the one here who is justifying censorship.

Since when is social media not a "public airway?" If you are posting under your name, it sure is public.
And buddy, if not letting that kind of statement on public airways is "censorship," it is absolutely fine with me. Deal with not being able to be completely obscene except in your own backyard.

Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

 

[Correll]

Oh, so you're dropping your earlier pretense of not knowing it was a figure of speech?

Did you get feedback that that line of shit wasn't sticking and now you're walking it back?



If you would seriously, just a few hours ago, claim to really believe he was going to heat a poker on nation tv and assault his interviewee,


how do you expect me to believe anything you say?

Well, I don't believe anything you say, so why should I be alone?

I didn't reverse my stance. I find it more than a bit odd that you think I did.

I find it unlikely that you truly don't believe what I say. I am a very honest person, and I think most people can sense that, after a while.


You are the one pretending to not understand normal english usage to justify censorship.


And you have certainly walked it back, from not believing it was a figure of speech to, arguing that it was inappropriate.



It is completely reasonable that you should have no credibility, while I, who have been very consistent and honest on this site, would.

Nope. I only know what I see. It doesn't take a lot of time to see that your cheese done slid clear off your cracker. You've been attacking anyone who disagrees with you, simply for disagreeing with you, and not just attacking but accusing us of trying to kill free speech because this sick fuck who by the way RESIGNED said something that was absolutely heinous.

The fact that you are going to defend him when I never said he couldn't say that, as thought I had in fact said that is why I do not ascribe value to the words coming off your keyboard.

The minute you twist the truth, it ceases to be the truth.

"Cheese"?, "Cracker"?


What are you talking about? YOu don't know what food I have at my table?


Oh, wait, was that a figure of speech?


Mmm, how ironic.


Your dishonesty is plain to see.


If the reporter in question was a good little lib, talking about an upcoming conservative guest, we would have never even heard of this and if we did, you would fully support him.

You never saw The Green Mile?

No, it wasn't a figure of speech. It was a euphemism.

And people who see me as being dishonest right now would probably think the same if I just showed up and said nothing more than "Hey, I'm a liberal."

NOpe. YOur behavior in this thread is plenty of evidence to judge your honesty, or lack there off.

 

[Witchit]

Well, I don't believe anything you say, so why should I be alone?

I didn't reverse my stance. I find it more than a bit odd that you think I did.

I find it unlikely that you truly don't believe what I say. I am a very honest person, and I think most people can sense that, after a while.


You are the one pretending to not understand normal english usage to justify censorship.


And you have certainly walked it back, from not believing it was a figure of speech to, arguing that it was inappropriate.



It is completely reasonable that you should have no credibility, while I, who have been very consistent and honest on this site, would.

Nope. I only know what I see. It doesn't take a lot of time to see that your cheese done slid clear off your cracker. You've been attacking anyone who disagrees with you, simply for disagreeing with you, and not just attacking but accusing us of trying to kill free speech because this sick fuck who by the way RESIGNED said something that was absolutely heinous.

The fact that you are going to defend him when I never said he couldn't say that, as thought I had in fact said that is why I do not ascribe value to the words coming off your keyboard.

The minute you twist the truth, it ceases to be the truth.

"Cheese"?, "Cracker"?


What are you talking about? YOu don't know what food I have at my table?


Oh, wait, was that a figure of speech?


Mmm, how ironic.


Your dishonesty is plain to see.


If the reporter in question was a good little lib, talking about an upcoming conservative guest, we would have never even heard of this and if we did, you would fully support him.

You never saw The Green Mile?

No, it wasn't a figure of speech. It was a euphemism.

And people who see me as being dishonest right now would probably think the same if I just showed up and said nothing more than "Hey, I'm a liberal."

NOpe. YOur behavior in this thread is plenty of evidence to judge your honesty, or lack there off.

You know? I'm fine with that.

 

[Tilly]

I can't believe that a large segment of our society has embraced the idea of using censorship to silence their political opponents and thus "win" the debate.

I can't believe you. If you think there is any "debate" involved in that guy's statement, you've been hanging around USMB too long.

Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.

Correll, of course I have said all of those things personally (well maybe not about the dog) in the privacy of my own home or with my circle of friends (NOT on social media). I would never stand in front of my class and tell one of my students "I'm gonna stick a hot poker up Wayne LaPierre's ass." Or up anyone else's ass because I didn't agree with them. First off, I would never say anything that aggressively hostile to begin with, but more importantly, it is not how debate or civil disagreement is handled.
And you STILL are arguing that it is FINE, all day long you've been at it. I thought you were better than this Correll.

Apparently...that kind of language is not only acceptable for today's trumpanzee.....it could get you elected to office.

That is not cheering me up, Bodeca.
I'm getting accused of not caring about the Nazi's killing the Jews because I think we should get out of Syria. Now I'm getting accused of wanting censorship when I attempt to teach some rudimentary manners to someone old enough to know better.
Some days this place sucks.

You frequently support censorship - if you don’t want it, don’t support it,

 

[Correll]

You don't get to demand that Hogg's words be treated with respect and then use the "Child" card to demand that he not be treated with the same level of hardball that he has been happy to dish out.


And it is not pornographic. If you find the idea of impalement on red hot irons to be sexual, that is on you.


TO the rest of us, it is a violent metaphor, and somewhat vulgar. But it was a comment on social media, not public airways.


You are the one here who is justifying censorship.

Since when is social media not a "public airway?" If you are posting under your name, it sure is public.
And buddy, if not letting that kind of statement on public airways is "censorship," it is absolutely fine with me. Deal with not being able to be completely obscene except in your own backyard.

Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

 

[Correll]

I find it unlikely that you truly don't believe what I say. I am a very honest person, and I think most people can sense that, after a while.


You are the one pretending to not understand normal english usage to justify censorship.


And you have certainly walked it back, from not believing it was a figure of speech to, arguing that it was inappropriate.



It is completely reasonable that you should have no credibility, while I, who have been very consistent and honest on this site, would.

Nope. I only know what I see. It doesn't take a lot of time to see that your cheese done slid clear off your cracker. You've been attacking anyone who disagrees with you, simply for disagreeing with you, and not just attacking but accusing us of trying to kill free speech because this sick fuck who by the way RESIGNED said something that was absolutely heinous.

The fact that you are going to defend him when I never said he couldn't say that, as thought I had in fact said that is why I do not ascribe value to the words coming off your keyboard.

The minute you twist the truth, it ceases to be the truth.

"Cheese"?, "Cracker"?


What are you talking about? YOu don't know what food I have at my table?


Oh, wait, was that a figure of speech?


Mmm, how ironic.


Your dishonesty is plain to see.


If the reporter in question was a good little lib, talking about an upcoming conservative guest, we would have never even heard of this and if we did, you would fully support him.

You never saw The Green Mile?

No, it wasn't a figure of speech. It was a euphemism.

And people who see me as being dishonest right now would probably think the same if I just showed up and said nothing more than "Hey, I'm a liberal."

NOpe. YOur behavior in this thread is plenty of evidence to judge your honesty, or lack there off.

You know? I'm fine with that.

If you say so.

I have seen quite a few liberals who are openly and blatantly dishonest, to a disgusting degree, and it does not seem to bother them.

 

[bodecea]

I can't believe that a large segment of our society has embraced the idea of using censorship to silence their political opponents and thus "win" the debate.

I can't believe you. If you think there is any "debate" involved in that guy's statement, you've been hanging around USMB too long.

Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.

Correll, of course I have said all of those things personally (well maybe not about the dog) in the privacy of my own home or with my circle of friends (NOT on social media). I would never stand in front of my class and tell one of my students "I'm gonna stick a hot poker up Wayne LaPierre's ass." Or up anyone else's ass because I didn't agree with them. First off, I would never say anything that aggressively hostile to begin with, but more importantly, it is not how debate or civil disagreement is handled.
And you STILL are arguing that it is FINE, all day long you've been at it. I thought you were better than this Correll.

Social Media, is a grey area, some people consider it more private than others.


You admit that you have said, similar, though less course, figures of speech in private.



Thank you for your honesty on that. Several of the liberals are pretending that such figures of speech do not exist. THey are liars.



I am against censorship. That is what this is about.


This is David HOgg.



"It just makes me think what sick fuckers out there want to continue to sell more guns, murder more children, and honestly just get reelected," Hogg said. "What type of shitty person does that? They could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action, because they all still see these dollar signs."



He's not playing nice. It is not reasonable to expect people to take that type of abuse and smile and nod politely in return.

Hogg is right. Congress and the Senate has stood by since the Brady Act was signed and done the NRA’s bidding.

The NRA used to be in favour of sensible gun laws, but under Wayne LaPierre even background checks are an assault on the 2nd Amendment. The NRA has changed and not for the better.

And those in Congress and the Senate who have sat on their hands done the NRA’s bidding, and refused to deal with the mounting body counts from schools, and other public shootings, especially since Sandy Hook, do have the blood of innocents on their hands.

Read up on the Revolt in Cincinnati.....explains what happened to the NRA and how it got taken over by a man, Harlon Carter, who had served time in prison for shooting and killing a Mexican teenage boy.

 

[Witchit]

Nope. I only know what I see. It doesn't take a lot of time to see that your cheese done slid clear off your cracker. You've been attacking anyone who disagrees with you, simply for disagreeing with you, and not just attacking but accusing us of trying to kill free speech because this sick fuck who by the way RESIGNED said something that was absolutely heinous.

The fact that you are going to defend him when I never said he couldn't say that, as thought I had in fact said that is why I do not ascribe value to the words coming off your keyboard.

The minute you twist the truth, it ceases to be the truth.

"Cheese"?, "Cracker"?


What are you talking about? YOu don't know what food I have at my table?


Oh, wait, was that a figure of speech?


Mmm, how ironic.


Your dishonesty is plain to see.


If the reporter in question was a good little lib, talking about an upcoming conservative guest, we would have never even heard of this and if we did, you would fully support him.

You never saw The Green Mile?

No, it wasn't a figure of speech. It was a euphemism.

And people who see me as being dishonest right now would probably think the same if I just showed up and said nothing more than "Hey, I'm a liberal."

NOpe. YOur behavior in this thread is plenty of evidence to judge your honesty, or lack there off.

You know? I'm fine with that.

If you say so.

I have seen quite a few liberals who are openly and blatantly dishonest, to a disgusting degree, and it does not seem to bother them.

My conscience is clear. But then, I have a lifelong reputation for honesty, sometimes preceded by 'brutally' or 'painfully.' So your attacks fly in the face of my self-awareness.

Sorry/not sorry.

 

[Witchit]

Since when is social media not a "public airway?" If you are posting under your name, it sure is public.
And buddy, if not letting that kind of statement on public airways is "censorship," it is absolutely fine with me. Deal with not being able to be completely obscene except in your own backyard.

Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

"Previous bitch?" Ah. Okay.

So that's the kind of person you are.

Wow.

And you hold yourself in high esteem?

Interesting.

 

[Correll]

"Cheese"?, "Cracker"?


What are you talking about? YOu don't know what food I have at my table?


Oh, wait, was that a figure of speech?


Mmm, how ironic.


Your dishonesty is plain to see.


If the reporter in question was a good little lib, talking about an upcoming conservative guest, we would have never even heard of this and if we did, you would fully support him.

You never saw The Green Mile?

No, it wasn't a figure of speech. It was a euphemism.

And people who see me as being dishonest right now would probably think the same if I just showed up and said nothing more than "Hey, I'm a liberal."

NOpe. YOur behavior in this thread is plenty of evidence to judge your honesty, or lack there off.

You know? I'm fine with that.

If you say so.

I have seen quite a few liberals who are openly and blatantly dishonest, to a disgusting degree, and it does not seem to bother them.

My conscience is clear. But then, I have a lifelong reputation for honesty, sometimes preceded by 'brutally' or 'painfully.' So your attacks fly in the face of my self-awareness.

Sorry/not sorry.

Sorry, but someone who pretends to not understand the concept of figure of speech, doesn't get to have credibility.

 

[bodecea]

Since when is social media not a "public airway?" If you are posting under your name, it sure is public.
And buddy, if not letting that kind of statement on public airways is "censorship," it is absolutely fine with me. Deal with not being able to be completely obscene except in your own backyard.

Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

Whaaaaaah! The libs will get away with it if they do it next month.....Whaaaaaaah!

 

[Witchit]

You never saw The Green Mile?

No, it wasn't a figure of speech. It was a euphemism.

And people who see me as being dishonest right now would probably think the same if I just showed up and said nothing more than "Hey, I'm a liberal."

NOpe. YOur behavior in this thread is plenty of evidence to judge your honesty, or lack there off.

You know? I'm fine with that.

If you say so.

I have seen quite a few liberals who are openly and blatantly dishonest, to a disgusting degree, and it does not seem to bother them.

My conscience is clear. But then, I have a lifelong reputation for honesty, sometimes preceded by 'brutally' or 'painfully.' So your attacks fly in the face of my self-awareness.

Sorry/not sorry.

Sorry, but someone who pretends to not understand the concept of figure of speech, doesn't get to have credibility.

Again. I'm not really caring about your perception of me.

 

[Correll]

Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

Whaaaaaah! The libs will get away with it if they do it next month.....Whaaaaaaah!

And in doing so, prove my point.


Which you know, which is why you are being such a bitch about it.


Cause you know you have nothing real to refute what I said.

 

[OldLady]

I can't believe you. If you think there is any "debate" involved in that guy's statement, you've been hanging around USMB too long.

Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.

Correll, of course I have said all of those things personally (well maybe not about the dog) in the privacy of my own home or with my circle of friends (NOT on social media). I would never stand in front of my class and tell one of my students "I'm gonna stick a hot poker up Wayne LaPierre's ass." Or up anyone else's ass because I didn't agree with them. First off, I would never say anything that aggressively hostile to begin with, but more importantly, it is not how debate or civil disagreement is handled.
And you STILL are arguing that it is FINE, all day long you've been at it. I thought you were better than this Correll.

Social Media, is a grey area, some people consider it more private than others.


You admit that you have said, similar, though less course, figures of speech in private.



Thank you for your honesty on that. Several of the liberals are pretending that such figures of speech do not exist. THey are liars.



I am against censorship. That is what this is about.


This is David HOgg.



"It just makes me think what sick fuckers out there want to continue to sell more guns, murder more children, and honestly just get reelected," Hogg said. "What type of shitty person does that? They could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action, because they all still see these dollar signs."



He's not playing nice. It is not reasonable to expect people to take that type of abuse and smile and nod politely in return.

David Hogg used coarse language, but he did not target anyone specifically; he was speaking about the gun industry and politicians without enough spine to regulate our filthy gun habit.
I think Hogg has a lot to learn; that's kind of understandable considering his age. But to think HIS quote was somehow damnable and this newscasters wasn't makes no sense to me.
The newscaster made that remark in the public square under his own name. He wasn't censored. He was appropriately fired for inappropriate behavior. That's the trade off for being a professional in the public eye. If you don't like it, don't take a job in the public eye.

Hogg's statement targeted anyone that disagreed with him politically.


I'm not saying that he should be silenced. I'm pointing out that he is dishing it out, and liberals are using his youth to try to silence anyone that gives it back.


That's hypocrisy and dishonesty, and they it is a reoccurring tactic, with the intent of suppressing the speech of their enemies.



YOu are being played.

How did the liberals try to silence anyone that gives it back?
The Sinclair newscaster paid the price for unprofessional behavior. He didn't lose his job for saying something conservative. He lost his job for being unprofessional.
Ingraham lost advertisers, which was a business decision THEY made, not some leftist cabal.
Their words were not taken down; they are enshrined for all posterity. And I'm absolutely POSITIVE that some more Alt Right assholes will make unprofessional ad homs again tomorrow and the next day. Like I said at the very beginning of this thread, people should not drink and tweet.

 

[bodecea]

Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

"Previous bitch?" Ah. Okay.

So that's the kind of person you are.

Wow.

And you hold yourself in high esteem?

Interesting.

Well, it's not as if trumpanzees are shy about being misogynists.

 

[Correll]

NOpe. YOur behavior in this thread is plenty of evidence to judge your honesty, or lack there off.

You know? I'm fine with that.

If you say so.

I have seen quite a few liberals who are openly and blatantly dishonest, to a disgusting degree, and it does not seem to bother them.

My conscience is clear. But then, I have a lifelong reputation for honesty, sometimes preceded by 'brutally' or 'painfully.' So your attacks fly in the face of my self-awareness.

Sorry/not sorry.

Sorry, but someone who pretends to not understand the concept of figure of speech, doesn't get to have credibility.

Again. I'm not really caring about your perception of me.

NOt really about my personal perception.


It's really pretty objective.


You were very dishonest in this thread, and quite blatantly so.


NOw you want to claim you have a reputation for honesty?


LOL!! That does not fly.


(hint: that was another figure of speech, do you want to pretend to not understand it?)

 

[bodecea]

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

Whaaaaaah! The libs will get away with it if they do it next month.....Whaaaaaaah!

And in doing so, prove my point.


Which you know, which is why you are being such a bitch about it.


Cause you know you have nothing real to refute what I said.

Psssssst.....you're still whining.

 

[Correll]

Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.

Correll, of course I have said all of those things personally (well maybe not about the dog) in the privacy of my own home or with my circle of friends (NOT on social media). I would never stand in front of my class and tell one of my students "I'm gonna stick a hot poker up Wayne LaPierre's ass." Or up anyone else's ass because I didn't agree with them. First off, I would never say anything that aggressively hostile to begin with, but more importantly, it is not how debate or civil disagreement is handled.
And you STILL are arguing that it is FINE, all day long you've been at it. I thought you were better than this Correll.

Social Media, is a grey area, some people consider it more private than others.


You admit that you have said, similar, though less course, figures of speech in private.



Thank you for your honesty on that. Several of the liberals are pretending that such figures of speech do not exist. THey are liars.



I am against censorship. That is what this is about.


This is David HOgg.



"It just makes me think what sick fuckers out there want to continue to sell more guns, murder more children, and honestly just get reelected," Hogg said. "What type of shitty person does that? They could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action, because they all still see these dollar signs."



He's not playing nice. It is not reasonable to expect people to take that type of abuse and smile and nod politely in return.

David Hogg used coarse language, but he did not target anyone specifically; he was speaking about the gun industry and politicians without enough spine to regulate our filthy gun habit.
I think Hogg has a lot to learn; that's kind of understandable considering his age. But to think HIS quote was somehow damnable and this newscasters wasn't makes no sense to me.
The newscaster made that remark in the public square under his own name. He wasn't censored. He was appropriately fired for inappropriate behavior. That's the trade off for being a professional in the public eye. If you don't like it, don't take a job in the public eye.

Hogg's statement targeted anyone that disagreed with him politically.


I'm not saying that he should be silenced. I'm pointing out that he is dishing it out, and liberals are using his youth to try to silence anyone that gives it back.


That's hypocrisy and dishonesty, and they it is a reoccurring tactic, with the intent of suppressing the speech of their enemies.



YOu are being played.

How did the liberals try to silence anyone that gives it back?
The Sinclair newscaster paid the price for unprofessional behavior. He didn't lose his job for saying something conservative. He lost his job for being unprofessional.
Ingraham lost advertisers, which was a business decision THEY made, not some leftist cabal.
Their words were not taken down; they are enshrined for all posterity. And I'm absolutely POSITIVE that some more Alt Right assholes will make unprofessional ad homs again tomorrow and the next day. Like I said at the very beginning of this thread, people should not drink and tweet.

When, as i predicted, liberals let a similar incident pass, because the person in question, is a good little lib,


that will demonstrate that this was not about "unprofessional behavior" but about silencing someone who dared to "give it back".


You will see.

 

[Correll]

So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

"Previous bitch?" Ah. Okay.

So that's the kind of person you are.

Wow.

And you hold yourself in high esteem?

Interesting.

Well, it's not as if trumpanzees are shy about being misogynists.

Said the rude person pretending that they did not deserve what I called them.

 

[Correll]

I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.

The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.

Whaaaaaah! The libs will get away with it if they do it next month.....Whaaaaaaah!

And in doing so, prove my point.


Which you know, which is why you are being such a bitch about it.


Cause you know you have nothing real to refute what I said.

Psssssst.....you're still whining.

What I am doing it calling you on your bullshit, and you know it.


And you are just demonstrating that your only defense, is being an asshole.