ABC, Sinclair anchor, "I'm going to ram a hot poker up David Hoggs ass"

Since when is social media not a "public airway?" If you are posting under your name, it sure is public.
And buddy, if not letting that kind of statement on public airways is "censorship," it is absolutely fine with me. Deal with not being able to be completely obscene except in your own backyard.




Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.
So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?



I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.
 
I can't believe you. If you think there is any "debate" involved in that guy's statement, you've been hanging around USMB too long.


Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.
Correll, of course I have said all of those things personally (well maybe not about the dog) in the privacy of my own home or with my circle of friends (NOT on social media). I would never stand in front of my class and tell one of my students "I'm gonna stick a hot poker up Wayne LaPierre's ass." Or up anyone else's ass because I didn't agree with them. First off, I would never say anything that aggressively hostile to begin with, but more importantly, it is not how debate or civil disagreement is handled.
And you STILL are arguing that it is FINE, all day long you've been at it. I thought you were better than this Correll.
Apparently...that kind of language is not only acceptable for today's trumpanzee.....it could get you elected to office.
That is not cheering me up, Bodeca.
I'm getting accused of not caring about the Nazi's killing the Jews because I think we should get out of Syria. Now I'm getting accused of wanting censorship when I attempt to teach some rudimentary manners to someone old enough to know better.
Some days this place sucks.
You frequently support censorship - if you don’t want it, don’t support it,
This particular incident is not censorship or an attempt at censorship; that is the point.
 
Just watch. A week, a month from now, some good lefty will do something equally as crude, and it will pass with barely a mention.


You are being played.


And people lives are being destroyed, and Free Speech is being assaulted.
So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?



I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
 
I just cannot believe we are having a discussion about this. I cannot believe anyone is actually defending this type of speech by a professional against any opponent.
I. CANNOT. BELIEVE. IT.



I can't believe that a large segment of our society has embraced the idea of using censorship to silence their political opponents and thus "win" the debate.
I can't believe you. If you think there is any "debate" involved in that guy's statement, you've been hanging around USMB too long.


Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.

I can truthfully say I have never said a single one of those things to anyone. As a child, I learned that if I lost my temper because of something someone else did or said, The other person had won. As a result, I learned to control my temper, and not say or do stupid things.

I have had two mantras through out my adult life: don’t make promises you can’t keep, and don’t make threats you can’t follow through on. My children knew that if I made a threat, it would happen.

As a teenager learning to train horses, the old horse trainer who mentored me said “If you lose your temper with your horse, put him in the barn. The horse has won. Nothing good will be accomplished this day”. This advice has served me well, not just with training horses, but in raising children and in dealing with people in general.

This idiot lost his temper and then told the world just how angry he was. And he got himself fired.

Contrast this with David Hogg. When attacked, he didn’t call anyone names, or insult them. He spoke out calmly, with purpose and an objective. And he got the results he wanted.

By all means, keep lashing out and attacking these kids. They’re clearly more mature and emotionally grounded than those who seek to silence them.


oh, yeah, he's a peach.



"It just makes me think what sick fuckers out there want to continue to sell more guns, murder more children, and honestly just get reelected," Hogg said. "What type of shitty person does that? They could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action, because they all still see these dollar signs."




You are supporting censorship.
He's right. The kind of shitty person who profits from mass shootings......pushing for more membership....pushing for more gun/ammo sales because THE GUN GRABBERS R COMING!!!!!!!
 
So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?



I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?

Nope. See - that's the thing. I actually expect people who say they set a standard? To set a standard. And you're not.

As for the example, what do you mean by "watch for it." I'm not going to set up Google alerts. I repudiated Anthony Weiner pretty much the minute he got busted. But seriously, you need to back off. You're in the wrong here, and you will not admit it, which is fine, you have that right. Just stop telling me about it. I don't care.
 
So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?



I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
When you think you've got one, call me Correll. If a liberal says something like that newscaster, and it is actually something similar to the newscaster, I will condemn it, I promise you. But not if it's an imaginary slight.
 
So...now you are whining.
Tell you what.......start a thread on "some good lefty" doing "something equally as crude" and we'll see. Ok?



I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
And now someone's feelings have been hurt by my being rude. Oh! whatever will we do!?!?!?!?
 
Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.
Correll, of course I have said all of those things personally (well maybe not about the dog) in the privacy of my own home or with my circle of friends (NOT on social media). I would never stand in front of my class and tell one of my students "I'm gonna stick a hot poker up Wayne LaPierre's ass." Or up anyone else's ass because I didn't agree with them. First off, I would never say anything that aggressively hostile to begin with, but more importantly, it is not how debate or civil disagreement is handled.
And you STILL are arguing that it is FINE, all day long you've been at it. I thought you were better than this Correll.
Apparently...that kind of language is not only acceptable for today's trumpanzee.....it could get you elected to office.
That is not cheering me up, Bodeca.
I'm getting accused of not caring about the Nazi's killing the Jews because I think we should get out of Syria. Now I'm getting accused of wanting censorship when I attempt to teach some rudimentary manners to someone old enough to know better.
Some days this place sucks.
You frequently support censorship - if you don’t want it, don’t support it,
This particular incident is not censorship or an attempt at censorship; that is the point.


That is your conclusion, based on the assumption that the outrage over the statement is real.


A premise that will be proved false, when it is a liberal that makes such a statement.


Also, these same liberals, were pretending, initially, to not understand that it was a figure of speech.


DOesn't that make you just a little skeptical?
 
I can't believe that a large segment of our society has embraced the idea of using censorship to silence their political opponents and thus "win" the debate.
I can't believe you. If you think there is any "debate" involved in that guy's statement, you've been hanging around USMB too long.


Yes you can.

Are you seriously claiming you never heard anyone, hell, that YOU'VE never said something along the lines of "I'm going to beat his ass" or "I'm going to kill that dog" or "I'm going to ground that kid until she is 30."?


YOu are being absurd.


And you are supporting censorship.

I can truthfully say I have never said a single one of those things to anyone. As a child, I learned that if I lost my temper because of something someone else did or said, The other person had won. As a result, I learned to control my temper, and not say or do stupid things.

I have had two mantras through out my adult life: don’t make promises you can’t keep, and don’t make threats you can’t follow through on. My children knew that if I made a threat, it would happen.

As a teenager learning to train horses, the old horse trainer who mentored me said “If you lose your temper with your horse, put him in the barn. The horse has won. Nothing good will be accomplished this day”. This advice has served me well, not just with training horses, but in raising children and in dealing with people in general.

This idiot lost his temper and then told the world just how angry he was. And he got himself fired.

Contrast this with David Hogg. When attacked, he didn’t call anyone names, or insult them. He spoke out calmly, with purpose and an objective. And he got the results he wanted.

By all means, keep lashing out and attacking these kids. They’re clearly more mature and emotionally grounded than those who seek to silence them.


oh, yeah, he's a peach.



"It just makes me think what sick fuckers out there want to continue to sell more guns, murder more children, and honestly just get reelected," Hogg said. "What type of shitty person does that? They could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action, because they all still see these dollar signs."




You are supporting censorship.
He's right. The kind of shitty person who profits from mass shootings......pushing for more membership....pushing for more gun/ammo sales because THE GUN GRABBERS R COMING!!!!!!!


He is a rude asshole.

He has been happy to dish it out.


BUt when it comes time for him to take it, you libs play the "he is just a underage boy" card.


Because you know that you can't win the debate of ideas, based on the merits of your ideas.


YOu have to suppress the speech of your enemies.
 
I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
And now someone's feelings have been hurt by my being rude. Oh! whatever will we do!?!?!?!?

And on the internet, of all places!!
 
I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?

Nope. See - that's the thing. I actually expect people who say they set a standard? To set a standard. And you're not.

As for the example, what do you mean by "watch for it." I'm not going to set up Google alerts. I repudiated Anthony Weiner pretty much the minute he got busted. But seriously, you need to back off. You're in the wrong here, and you will not admit it, which is fine, you have that right. Just stop telling me about it. I don't care.



My "standard" is that I don't let libs get away with being rude assholes, and not call them on it.


Bodecia, was losing, so she started talking shit. And I called her on it, and then returned the rudeness.


I have not asked you to watch for it. I know that you will be one of the ones, actively making excuses when it happens.


I was talking to Old Lady, who sincerely thinks this is about inappropriate behavior.


IN time, you will demonstrate for her, that it was not.
 
I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
And now someone's feelings have been hurt by my being rude. Oh! whatever will we do!?!?!?!?


Anger is the proper response to someone being rude.


What about that is confusing to you?
 
Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
And now someone's feelings have been hurt by my being rude. Oh! whatever will we do!?!?!?!?

And on the internet, of all places!!


Anger is the proper response to someone being rude.


What part of that is confusing to you?
 
The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
And now someone's feelings have been hurt by my being rude. Oh! whatever will we do!?!?!?!?

And on the internet, of all places!!


Anger is the proper response to someone being rude.


What part of that is confusing to you?

No, it's not. Ignoring them is the proper response.
 
Correll, of course I have said all of those things personally (well maybe not about the dog) in the privacy of my own home or with my circle of friends (NOT on social media). I would never stand in front of my class and tell one of my students "I'm gonna stick a hot poker up Wayne LaPierre's ass." Or up anyone else's ass because I didn't agree with them. First off, I would never say anything that aggressively hostile to begin with, but more importantly, it is not how debate or civil disagreement is handled.
And you STILL are arguing that it is FINE, all day long you've been at it. I thought you were better than this Correll.
Apparently...that kind of language is not only acceptable for today's trumpanzee.....it could get you elected to office.
That is not cheering me up, Bodeca.
I'm getting accused of not caring about the Nazi's killing the Jews because I think we should get out of Syria. Now I'm getting accused of wanting censorship when I attempt to teach some rudimentary manners to someone old enough to know better.
Some days this place sucks.
You frequently support censorship - if you don’t want it, don’t support it,
This particular incident is not censorship or an attempt at censorship; that is the point.


That is your conclusion, based on the assumption that the outrage over the statement is real.


A premise that will be proved false, when it is a liberal that makes such a statement.


Also, these same liberals, were pretending, initially, to not understand that it was a figure of speech.


DOesn't that make you just a little skeptical?
NOT AT ALL. I certainly felt it was outrageous for anyone to say it was a violation of free speech to object to the guy's language or behavior. I don't know what game you think decent people are playing here. Most of the people in this thread are telling you honestly what they think. Are you so twisted with suspicion and hatred of the opposition that you cannot hear?
 
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
And now someone's feelings have been hurt by my being rude. Oh! whatever will we do!?!?!?!?

And on the internet, of all places!!


Anger is the proper response to someone being rude.


What part of that is confusing to you?

No, it's not. Ignoring them is the proper response.


I strongly disagree.


In the past, that is the tact that conservatives have taken. To be above it.


It has allowed vile liars to create false perceptions that have, often become accepted as the Conventional Wisdom, because the constant assertions were not challenged.


If someone is rude to me, I will call them on it, point out that it was done because they could not make a real point, and then return the rudeness.
 
Apparently...that kind of language is not only acceptable for today's trumpanzee.....it could get you elected to office.
That is not cheering me up, Bodeca.
I'm getting accused of not caring about the Nazi's killing the Jews because I think we should get out of Syria. Now I'm getting accused of wanting censorship when I attempt to teach some rudimentary manners to someone old enough to know better.
Some days this place sucks.
You frequently support censorship - if you don’t want it, don’t support it,
This particular incident is not censorship or an attempt at censorship; that is the point.


That is your conclusion, based on the assumption that the outrage over the statement is real.


A premise that will be proved false, when it is a liberal that makes such a statement.


Also, these same liberals, were pretending, initially, to not understand that it was a figure of speech.


DOesn't that make you just a little skeptical?
NOT AT ALL. I certainly felt it was outrageous for anyone to say it was a violation of free speech to object to the guy's language or behavior. I don't know what game you think decent people are playing here. Most of the people in this thread are telling you honestly what they think. Are you so twisted with suspicion and hatred of the opposition that you cannot hear?



Quite a number of them were denying that it was a figure of speech.


That was not honesty.


That was them being dishonest.
 
I made a prediction.


That you characterize it as whining, is just your way of saying you don't like what I said, but can't think of ANYTHING to say to actually address, let alone refute it.



Also, you are an asshole. Fuck you.

Gee, you seem angry.

Logic would dictate that if both parties are the same, you wouldn't have to predict. It would have already happened.

Have at it. I'll wait right here.



The previous bitch dismissed my post as "whining". That was very rude of her, and I called her on it.


What part of that is confusing for you?


And I'm sure that it has happened. And that if I spent the time, I could find examples of similar or worse behavior, and you libs would make excuses for the libs in question.


But it is far easier to predict your behavior, which will happen.


And Old Lady, when the time comes, can connect the dots herself.



Oh, and I did not say that both parties are the same. You libs are far worse.
Yup, you've moved into ad hom territory on Witchit. Means you know you're losing.

There is no censorship here. Learn a little bit about civil behavior and how professionals should behave in public and voila--your "censorship" problem will be solved.


Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
When you think you've got one, call me Correll. If a liberal says something like that newscaster, and it is actually something similar to the newscaster, I will condemn it, I promise you. But not if it's an imaginary slight.
Remember when Kathy Griffin had that picture of her holding a head like trump? We condemned that and her career is pretty well shot.
 
Bodecia was rude, and I returned the rudeness.


She is the one that went to the gutter because I had utterly kicked her ass.


Will you watch for the example I told you will come? Will you admit it, when it does?
And now someone's feelings have been hurt by my being rude. Oh! whatever will we do!?!?!?!?

And on the internet, of all places!!


Anger is the proper response to someone being rude.


What part of that is confusing to you?

No, it's not. Ignoring them is the proper response.


I strongly disagree.


In the past, that is the tact that conservatives have taken. To be above it.


It has allowed vile liars to create false perceptions that have, often become accepted as the Conventional Wisdom, because the constant assertions were not challenged.


If someone is rude to me, I will call them on it, point out that it was done because they could not make a real point, and then return the rudeness.
And when someone is whining about how life is so unfair because a "man" on his show thought it was a winning comment to threaten to stick a red hot poker up a teenager's ass.....and is held accountable by his audience.
 

Forum List

Back
Top