Aboard USS Iowa, Trump Holds Fundraiser For Fake Veterans Group Which Is Really Just One Guy

[Statistikhengst]

Rachel Maddow: ‘Veterans’ group’ fundraising off Trump speech is really one guy in S. Dakota


And the fun part of this is that it is Rachel Maddow who exposed it:

Trump’s appearance aboard the USS Iowa, she explained, was an event benefiting Veterans for a Strong America, with tickets ranging between $100 and $1,000.

However, Maddow said, the Federal Election Commission filings for the group’s PAC reveal that, besides having only $30 cash in hand and $318 in debts, the organization’s only member is founder Joel Arends.

“Donald Trump was not in the military, but he did use a pretty military backdrop tonight to raise money for a non-existent veterans’ group, which endorsed him formally as part of his introduction — and he said they have hundreds of thousands of members,” she said. “And they don’t. And so the whole thing is fake.”

This is Joel Arend's VETERANS FOR A STRONG AMERICA website:

http://www.veteransforastrongamerica.org/


And the info over the PAC itself:

Veterans for a Strong America Summary | OpenSecrets

So, let me get this straight. Trump does a 13 minute publicity stunt on board a mothballed battle cruiser for a group that has exactly ONE member.

This is fun.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Aboard USS Iowa, Trump Takes Fire

 

[guno]

Rachel Maddow: ‘Veterans’ group’ fundraising off Trump speech is really one guy in S. Dakota


And the fun part of this is that it is Rachel Maddow who exposed it:

Trump’s appearance aboard the USS Iowa, she explained, was an event benefiting Veterans for a Strong America, with tickets ranging between $100 and $1,000.

However, Maddow said, the Federal Election Commission filings for the group’s PAC reveal that, besides having only $30 cash in hand and $318 in debts, the organization’s only member is founder Joel Arends.

“Donald Trump was not in the military, but he did use a pretty military backdrop tonight to raise money for a non-existent veterans’ group, which endorsed him formally as part of his introduction — and he said they have hundreds of thousands of members,” she said. “And they don’t. And so the whole thing is fake.”

This is Joel Arend's VETERANS FOR A STRONG AMERICA website:

http://www.veteransforastrongamerica.org/


And the info over the PAC itself:

Veterans for a Strong America Summary | OpenSecrets

View attachment 50290

So, let me get this straight. Trump does a 13 minute publicity stunt on board a mothballed battle cruiser for a group that has exactly ONE member.

This is fun.

Well the guy did stay at a holiday express that night

 

[DarkFury]

Movements START with one person willing to stand up and speak.
Now as to COMPARING charity's how much has the ESTABLISHED Clinton Foundation paid out?

OR we CAN compare this way.... What Veterans group has Hillary come out and supported in a public speech?

 

[Statistikhengst]

LOL....

 

[bodecea]

The USS Iowa, where the NIS tried to frame a dead sailor for the mechanical failure that killed him and several others in one of the gun turrets because they didn't want to admit that the gunpowder packets were out-dated.

 

[DarkFury]

Damn Stats you LIED anyway. It's NOT a one man charity. It's a PAC..

It's right on the document YOU posted. So I guess now we are comparing PACS. Alright, *grins*

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

 

[Statistikhengst]

Damn Stats you LIED anyway. It's NOT a one man charity. It's a PAC..

It's right on the document YOU posted. So I guess now we are comparing PACS. Alright, *grins*

Uhh, you lose. It's a 1 man PAC. You do realize that a PAC is a group, right? They usually have more than one person.

Lol...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[g5000]

Here're the numbers for the Super PAC for the 2012 Presidential election:

 

[Statistikhengst]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Uhm, no, you stupid ****.

The terms battleship and battle cruiser should be interchangeable. Prove me wrong, ****.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[DarkFury]

Damn Stats you LIED anyway. It's NOT a one man charity. It's a PAC..

It's right on the document YOU posted. So I guess now we are comparing PACS. Alright, *grins*

Uhh, you lose. It's a 1 man PAC. You do realize that a PAC is a group, right? They usually have more than one person.

Lol...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Well the ONLY reason a Hillary PAC has more then one person leading is they have so much ILLEGAL money to launder from overseas.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Damn Stats you LIED anyway. It's NOT a one man charity. It's a PAC..

It's right on the document YOU posted. So I guess now we are comparing PACS. Alright, *grins*

Uhh, you lose. It's a 1 man PAC. You do realize that a PAC is a group, right? They usually have more than one person.

Lol...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Well the ONLY reason a Hillary PAC has more then one person leading is they have so much ILLEGAL money to launder from overseas.

Thank you for admitting you are stupid. That saves us some work.

Carry on.

 

[g5000]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Uhm, no, you stupid ****.

The terms battleship and battle cruiser should be interchangeable. Prove me wrong, ****.

Two different class ships, dope. Definitely not interchangeable.

A battlecruiser, or battle cruiser, was a large capital ship built in the first half of the 20th century. They were similar in size and cost to a battleship, and typically carried the same kind of heavy guns, but generally carried less armour and were faster.

Battlecruiser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[DarkFury]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Uhm, no, you stupid ****.

The terms battleship and battle cruiser should be interchangeable. Prove me wrong, ****.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

THIS is a battle ship;;

THIS is a cruiser and NO they do NOT interchange.

SEE the difference PIN HEAD?

 

[Statistikhengst]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Ahhh, so, you cannot prove me wrong. Here, I will help your weak mind:

Battlecruiser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gee, sure looks a helluva lot like a battleship, you stupid ****.

This is fun.

Any other stupid stuff you want to write, you stupid ****?

Carry on.

 

[Statistikhengst]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Uhm, no, you stupid ****.

The terms battleship and battle cruiser should be interchangeable. Prove me wrong, ****.

Two different class ships, dope. Definitely not interchangeable.

A battlecruiser, or battle cruiser, was a large capital ship built in the first half of the 20th century. They were similar in size and cost to a battleship, and typically carried the same kind of heavy guns, but generally carried less armour and were faster.

Battlecruiser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LOL.....

 

[DarkFury]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Uhm, no, you stupid ****.

The terms battleship and battle cruiser should be interchangeable. Prove me wrong, ****.

Two different class ships, dope. Definitely not interchangeable.

A battlecruiser, or battle cruiser, was a large capital ship built in the first half of the 20th century. They were similar in size and cost to a battleship, and typically carried the same kind of heavy guns, but generally carried less armour and were faster.

Battlecruiser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LOL.....

Even g5000 nailed YOU for your lie. AND once Again Stats gets nailed for NOT knowing what he is running HIS mouth about.
Tip of the hat to g5000

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Uhm, no, you stupid ****.

The terms battleship and battle cruiser should be interchangeable. Prove me wrong, ****.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

You're an idiot, a cruiser and a battleship are two different types of ships.

 

[g5000]

The USS Iowa was not a cruiser, it was a battleship, there is a huge difference. Good grief

Ahhh, so, you cannot prove me wrong. Here, I will help your weak mind:

Battlecruiser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gee, sure looks a helluva lot like a battleship, you stupid ****.

It isn't a battleship. Read your own link.

This is getting very weird. Put down the crack pipe.