According To Witnesses The Michael Brown Killer Cop Acted Like A Vigilante

[jon_berzerk]

And..to add insult to injury, they left that young man laying in the street for four hours. no ambulance. no medical personnel. Just left him laying there. That cop murdered him, and his buds tried to cover it up.

they would not have left him there for 4 hours

if they had been covering their tracks

 

[Asclepias]

Did that guy just say the shooting was likely justified because cops hate paperwork. Really??!?!

What's so hard to understand? When a cop fires a gun at someone there are consequences for the cop. This means that cops aren't frivolously firing their guns. For this cop to fire his gun suggests that he believed doing so was warranted by the circumstances.

Youre a moron.

I cant believe you just typed that with all the cases of police killings and brutality. What a dumb ass!!!!

 

[Nutz]

What's so hard to understand? When a cop fires a gun at someone there are consequences for the cop. This means that cops aren't frivolously firing their guns. For this cop to fire his gun suggests that he believed doing so was warranted by the circumstances.

No it doesn't. Ridiculously pathetic argument on your part to say the cop must be innocent because he didn't want to do the paperwork. Simply fucking pathetic.

That cop must have been a white angel...hell, he shouldn't have to do any paperwork...he only shot a ******.

You're not big on reading comprehension, are you? Give it another try.

I'd reply, but I don't want to do the paperwork.


how you racists reach for straws.

 

[Politico]

Wow Marcs' racism was completely overshadowed by the last 23 pages of hate.

 

[Geaux4it]

Did that guy just say the shooting was likely justified because cops hate paperwork. Really??!?!

What's so hard to understand? When a cop fires a gun at someone there are consequences for the cop. This means that cops aren't frivolously firing their guns. For this cop to fire his gun suggests that he believed doing so was warranted by the circumstances.

No it doesn't. Ridiculously pathetic argument on your part to say the cop must be innocent because he didn't want to do the paperwork. Simply fucking pathetic.

That cop must have been a white angel...hell, he shouldn't have to do any paperwork...he only shot a ******.

Now, if the cop ran over a dog he would have ample paper work work to do as well.

-Geaux

 

[MarcATL]

I tend to side with the eyewitness accounts. Everyone said this poor kid turned around with his hands in the air and was executed. Short of looting, the people in that town have every right to be upset.

I can't believe I agree with you ....but I do.
the looting and destruction of property kills the protesters credibility..
but then again look what happens after teams lose football games...

Actually, it doesn't kill the credibility of the protesters at all, because we know that the looters were not a part of the protesters, they are two different group. Anyone who claims that the credibility was lost due to the looters never had any "credibility" in the protesters to begin with and was solely looking for an excuse to say so.

 

[MarcATL]

Also, we should consider the character of Michael Brown. Did he typically behave like a savage, or was he civilized?

One thing to note is this:

Where did you get that? According to the news he had no criminal record. Not that it makes a difference if the cop shot him as the witnesses say.

Michael Brown had no criminal record, police say

I thought WAKE was sharper than that. He should have known that there must be at least several people in Missouri with that name. But now that he has caught up with the rest of us, has he changed his tune about considering Mike Brown's ( deceased) character?
I'll not hold my breath waiting for that one!

[MENTION=44124]Wake[/MENTION] is a fraud.

His sole purpose is to bash and attack the protesters anyway.

He just grabbed the nearest thing he THOUGHT would support his BOGUS cause.

He has ZERO credibility.

 

[Katzndogz]

Of course Brown had no criminal record. He was only 18. No matter how many times he was arrested, charged or even sentenced he would have no criminal record.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

in 2010 58% of hate crime offenders were Latino or white, 18% of offenders were black, 8.9% were of individuals of multiple races and 1% of offenders were Native Americans.

Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Report database

Link for that if you dont mind.

are you google challenged ?

Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Report - Bing

Are you a dumbfuck for not posting the link in the first place? Yes,yes you are.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

in 2010 58% of hate crime offenders were Latino or white, 18% of offenders were black, 8.9% were of individuals of multiple races and 1% of offenders were Native Americans.

Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Report database

Link for that if you dont mind.

are you google challenged ?

Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Report - Bing

Are you a dumbfuck for not posting the link in the first place? Yes,yes you are.
And of course it's not a link to your source.

 

[MarcATL]

[BREAKING! BREAKING!

2nd witness is interviewed live on Lawrence O'Donnell show!

Eyewitness to Brown shooting tells her story | MSNBC

For those who were apprehensive about the witnesses in the Michael Brown shooting click on the link and put those doubts aside. Meet Tiffany Mitchell: A bright, articulate beautiful, self-confident and courageous Black woman. She made me proud!

The silk skinned black diva looked right into the camera during her interview on the Lawrence O’Donnel show. Fashionably garbed in a Black dress that could have been worn by royalty, Tiffany’s presence was the abject essence of class! The high forehead and large wide set eyes announced her high cognitive ability before she spoke a single word. When she did part her luscious lips to speak, there was not even a hint of hip-hop gangsterism or Ebonics.


Tiffany didn’t know Michael Brown and did not even live in that part of town. She just happened to be driving by when the whole thing started. She got out of her car and was in close proximity to the incident. Her story echoes that of the other witness.

Yeah, I had it on, but I was speaking to my parents and my brother in a group Skype so couldn't hear it. She looked very poise though. Nice looking young lady.

 

[MarcATL]

You forgot to mention the reputation of the LAPD. It played a large part in that stupid.

What does that have to do with some black viewer in Atlanta having a different opinion from a white viewer in Atlanta? They're not dealing with the LAPD.

The problem here is racial solidarity. Blacks showed a remarkably degree of racial solidarity during the OJ fiasco. Forget the LAPD, CNN asked people's opinion of OJ - 62% of whites thought he was guilty compared to only 14% of blacks. Everyone saw the same damn evidence presented at trial so WHY did whites and blacks reach such diametrically opposite conclusions as to OJ's guilt?

If a lot of black residents have a hate-on for the Ferguson PD because of their own interactions with the department, this presents a perfect opportunity to stick it to the man. Racial solidarity before truth and honor. You asked what the race of the witnesses had to do with anything - well this is what is in play. Knowing how important racial solidarity is to the community how can outsiders parse what is true from what is false in statements arising from this kind of environment. Witnesses with axes to grind are not the most reliable witnesses.

The difference is a history of cops framing and abusing blacks.

That [MENTION=50157]Rikurzhen[/MENTION] doesn't get or understand that speaks VOLUMES.

 

[MarcATL]

Of course Brown had no criminal record. He was only 18. No matter how many times he was arrested, charged or even sentenced he would have no criminal record.

Are you suggesting that the victim, Michael Brown, had some form of criminal past [MENTION=33658]Katzndogz[/MENTION]?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Police are permitted to chase criminals. Who knows how Brown escalated his crimes. First it was walking in the street. Then he refused to follow a lawful order. Then there was a scuffle with the officer. Was that resisting arrest? We don't know. The officer thought the incident required pulling his firearm and that's always a paperwork headache for police officers. Then he fired. This is more headache for the officer so it's likely a justified action. Now we're into assault of a police officer territory, then fleeing. That definitely warrants a pursuit.

It doesnt warrant shooting even if everything you said was actually true. This fucker is going down. Start crying now.

As I already said in response to that female witness video - everything the cop did could be justified, including the first wounding of Brown. Once Brown was surrendering is where the cop's position deteriorates (if the witness accounts are accurate) because now it looks like an execution of a suspect who was surrendering after giving up on fleeing.

Thats pretty much my take at this point.
The sad part? Had the guys listened to the cop and got out of the street we wouldnt even be discussing this.
I can understand the local black community getting tired of being screwed with,but when you openly defy the cops you're doing nothing but fanning the flames.
If I knew the cops had it in for me,I sure as hell wouldnt give them the excuse they were looking for to gun me down.

Whoops...I stand corrected. Apparently this is about more than J-walking.

 

[Katzndogz]

Of course Brown had no criminal record. He was only 18. No matter how many times he was arrested, charged or even sentenced he would have no criminal record.

Are you suggesting that the victim, Michael Brown, had some form of criminal past [MENTION=33658]Katzndogz[/MENTION]?

I'm not suggesting anything. I'm telling you that juvenile records are sealed so of course there would be no public record of Michael Brown having a criminal record. Surely you know that.

When I was carjacked by an 18 year old, HE had no criminal record either. Nothing admissible, but his sealed records had a rap sheet going back to armed robbery when he was 13.

The store video of the strong arm robbery that cause the police to go to the convenience store has been released, clearly showing a perpetrator answering the description of Michael Brown. I thought it was shoplifting, but it turned out to be a strong arm robbery. Stills of that video have been examined and have identified the perpetrator of that strong arm robbery AS Michael Brown.

 

[Asclepias]

Of course Brown had no criminal record. He was only 18. No matter how many times he was arrested, charged or even sentenced he would have no criminal record.

There would be a record of any arrests. Why cant you find any to support your implication?

 

[Asclepias]

Of course Brown had no criminal record. He was only 18. No matter how many times he was arrested, charged or even sentenced he would have no criminal record.

Are you suggesting that the victim, Michael Brown, had some form of criminal past [MENTION=33658]Katzndogz[/MENTION]?

I'm not suggesting anything. I'm telling you that juvenile records are sealed so of course there would be no public record of Michael Brown having a criminal record. Surely you know that.

When I was carjacked by an 18 year old, HE had no criminal record either. Nothing admissible, but his sealed records had a rap sheet going back to armed robbery when he was 13.

The store video of the strong arm robbery that cause the police to go to the convenience store has been released, clearly showing a perpetrator answering the description of Michael Brown. I thought it was shoplifting, but it turned out to be a strong arm robbery. Stills of that video have been examined and have identified the perpetrator of that strong arm robbery AS Michael Brown.

Do you have a link for that?

 

[dannyboys]

Put up the link proving Brown was the robber.
If there is video tape evidence which the FBI is willing to accept as fact then Brown's supporters need to waddle back to their shady porches and wait for Rev. Al to come up 'wiff' another money-maker for himself.
And the simians who use any excuse to loot and burn need to go back up their trees and wait for another opportunity.

 

[daws101]

[BREAKING! BREAKING!

2nd witness is interviewed live on Lawrence O'Donnell show!

Eyewitness to Brown shooting tells her story | MSNBC

For those who were apprehensive about the witnesses in the Michael Brown shooting click on the link and put those doubts aside. Meet Tiffany Mitchell: A bright, articulate beautiful, self-confident and courageous Black woman. She made me proud!

The silk skinned black diva looked right into the camera during her interview on the Lawrence O’Donnel show. Fashionably garbed in a Black dress that could have been worn by royalty, Tiffany’s presence was the abject essence of class! The high forehead and large wide set eyes announced her high cognitive ability before she spoke a single word. When she did part her luscious lips to speak, there was not even a hint of hip-hop gangsterism or Ebonics.


Tiffany didn’t know Michael Brown and did not even live in that part of town. She just happened to be driving by when the whole thing started. She got out of her car and was in close proximity to the incident. Her story echoes that of the other witness.

Damn, you'd have a great career as a writer for Cosmo or some fashion magazine. Maybe Ebony.

This interview is probably going to be bad news for the prosecution at trial for if she changes any point between now and then then that puts her credibility in question and that's going to be Mission #1 for the defense.

What she describes is Brown fleeing the officer. The officer alleges assault. That right there gives the officer cause to purse and quite possibly to shoot.

The problem for the officer's position occurs right at the last - did he gun down an already wounded and surrendering Brown? Was it an execution. She makes it sound like an execution.

he was unarmed... it was an execution ..

 

[Katzndogz]

Of course Brown had no criminal record. He was only 18. No matter how many times he was arrested, charged or even sentenced he would have no criminal record.

There would be a record of any arrests. Why cant you find any to support your implication?

I never said that Brown had a record. That was someone else. I was merely explaining why there would be no record even if he had been arrested. All records are sealed because Brown would have been a juvenile.