You have forgotten that Bush got all the key people behind the 9/11 attacks early on.Wouldn't you want to make sure that this scumball doesn't get off on a technicality? Whether he "talks" or not seems to be immaterial at this point. We get into trouble when we screw around with what has served the public so well and for so long. Treat him just as you would someone murdering 3 people at a 7/11 on a Tuesday in July. Collect evidence, protect the chain of custody, charge him, give him a fair and speedy trial, present your evidence, trust the good people in the jury to render a verdict and go from there.
Why in the world would you want to risk it by having their lawyer be able to argue, "My client was questioned without the presence of cousel".
We had a guy who was a suspect in a shooting at one of our trauma centers. The cops questioned him at the ICU post op. I wasn't there so I don't know if he agreed to it at the time or not--hard for me to think the cops would question him if he didn't agree to it. Anyway, the suspect had his lawyer try to throw out the evidence the cops collected.
I'm sure this happens all the time; the only reason I was privy to it was that the suspect tried to sue us for allowing the cops to be there since only family members were supposed to be allowed. What they didn't mention was that the authorities brought him into the ER.
Anyway, treat the scum ball just like any other murderer. Don't make a Casey Anthony, Jody Arias, or OJ Simpson out of this dude.
What makes you think that Obama will let him go if he gets off on a technicality?
yeah, cuz he's done it before, right?
Like, bin laden..
Oh wait, that was the RE-fucking-PUBLICANS who let him go.
Dang. I can't remember all the terrorists President Obama didn't kill with his drones that the treasonous RIGHT want ended.
Help me out, wouldja?
Give me some NAMES of those terrorists President Obama let go.
(You fucking lying ANTI-AMERICAN asshole.)