Ad Implores Women To Break Up With Obama

[Seawytch]

I can't believe you have the gall to call anyone else stupid.

Remind me how the employer mandates have been implemented. Or how the penalties have been enforced.
Yeah, I'll wait. Nah, I wont.
You're such an ill informed ninny.

Ah so you meant to sat FULLY instead of just implemented because portions have been implemented since the President signed it into law. One of those provisions, the individual mandate, is causing the number of uninsured to drop.

ACA has not been implemented That is a fact Actually it will never be implemented because the administration has already changed key provisions in the law.
Be that as it may, the increase in insureds is due mostly to increases in employment. Of course when the mandate kicks in employers will dump employees on the public exchange and some will opt for paying the penalty.
Currently almost anyone can apply for an exemption to the penalty.

Yes, provisions of the ACA went into effect immediately. Others, like the individual mandate, went into effect this year...which has led to a decrease in the uninsured...just like Heritage said it would. You guys should be happy your plan works!

The numbers will drop further when the employer mandate goes into effect.

Boy have you got that ass-backwards.

According to the Federal Register up to 60% of all employer funded insurance policies will be dropped and have to file for coverage in the exchanges.

Link? You gonna post the Forbes opinion piece?

 

[The Rabbi]

Remind me how the employer mandates have been implemented. Or how the penalties have been enforced.
Yeah, I'll wait. Nah, I wont.
You're such an ill informed ninny.

Ah so you meant to sat FULLY instead of just implemented because portions have been implemented since the President signed it into law. One of those provisions, the individual mandate, is causing the number of uninsured to drop.

ACA has not been implemented That is a fact Actually it will never be implemented because the administration has already changed key provisions in the law.
Be that as it may, the increase in insureds is due mostly to increases in employment. Of course when the mandate kicks in employers will dump employees on the public exchange and some will opt for paying the penalty.
Currently almost anyone can apply for an exemption to the penalty.

Yes, provisions of the ACA went into effect immediately. Others, like the individual mandate, went into effect this year...which has led to a decrease in the uninsured...just like Heritage said it would. You guys should be happy your plan works!

The numbers will drop further when the employer mandate goes into effect.

Boy have you got that ass-backwards.

According to the Federal Register up to 60% of all employer funded insurance policies will be dropped and have to file for coverage in the exchanges.

Link? You gonna post the Forbes opinion piece?

Federal Register. He said where it was from. What's your problem?

 

[Rikurzhen]

And that was the Republicans first mistake and one that they will regret in time.

I thought it was an effective ad.

I can see why libs don't like it.

Effective for whom?

It is primarily condescending. The only people it will sell to is the group that is already sold. So, for the group that already believes that you have a win. For everyone else, it was alienating.

Shaming people is a tactic which works. Liberals shame people who reject associating with homosexuals. It's fair for Republicans to shame women who voted for Obama because they imagined him as their cool boyfriend and that means most women. They need to be shamed into thinking with their heads, not their hearts.

 

[Rikurzhen]

The first president since Dwight D. Eisenhower to be elected TWICE with over 51% over the vote..

Amazing what importing a new voting bloc can do for Democrats.

 

[guno]

VOTE people. vote OUT all Obama's friends he has put in high positions over YOU

Ad implores women to break up with Obama



Posted by Kemberlee Kaye Sunday, September 21, 2014 at 4:00pm
Dream not come true.

This one made me chuckle. Staged as though Obama is her boyfriend, the ad shows a woman betrayed by President Obama’s promises.
She says:
“In 2008 I fell in love. His online profile made him seem perfect. Smart, handsome, charming, articulate, all the right values. I trusted him. But by 2012, our relationship was in trouble, but I stuck with him because he promised he’d be better. He’s great at promises. He told me we’d be safe. Have you looked at the news? He’s in my emails, text messages — spying on me but ignoring real threats. He said that we’d finally get on our feet financially. I’ll never pay down what he spent.
And the money line:

He thinks the only thing I care about is free birth control, but he wont even let me keep my own doctor. I know I’m stuck with Barack for two more years, I get that, but I’m not stuck with his friends. I’m looking for someone who gets that it’s not about him, it’s about us.”
Take a look:​

FROM:
Barack Obama 2016

Yes I am sure educated women will now run out and vote for the half dead fossilized crackers in the white christian party

 

[Lakhota]

So now the NaziCon GOP Taliban are "begging" women to break up with Obama. I assume because they can't factually dispute the GOP war on women.

 

[candycorn]

Watched the ad. Good ad insofar as being a tried and true GOP formula, try to make someone afraid and then lie about the other guy's record.

Women, as a voting block are firmly in the Dem camp. Money could be better spent elsewhere trying to convince the undecided that they are not all crazy.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Women, as a voting block are firmly in the Dem camp.

That's a complete mischaracterization. It's primarily the independent women who don't need a man and who have thus married the government that are firmly in the Democratic camp.

Romney won the white women's vote and he won the married women's vote. The women who want government to tax men and married people in order to get "free" birth control pills, you know, the "independent" women are the one's who voted for Obama.

It's a good thing to focus on the hypocrisy of "independent" women and shame them for being so dependent on government.

 

[candycorn]

Women, as a voting block are firmly in the Dem camp.

That's a complete mischaracterization. It's primarily the independent women who don't need a man and who have thus married the government that are firmly in the Democratic camp.

Romney won the white women's vote and he won the married women's vote. The women who want government to tax men and married people in order to get "free" birth control pills, you know, the "independent" women are the one's who voted for Obama.

It's a good thing to focus on the hypocrisy of "independent" women and shame them for being so dependent on government.

You're the textbook example of why the GOP has lost the women's vote for the foreseeable future. And you're too dumb to realize it. That is the hilarious thing about you

 

[Rikurzhen]

Women, as a voting block are firmly in the Dem camp.

That's a complete mischaracterization. It's primarily the independent women who don't need a man and who have thus married the government that are firmly in the Democratic camp.

Romney won the white women's vote and he won the married women's vote. The women who want government to tax men and married people in order to get "free" birth control pills, you know, the "independent" women are the one's who voted for Obama.

It's a good thing to focus on the hypocrisy of "independent" women and shame them for being so dependent on government.

You're the textbook example of why the GOP has lost the women's vote for the foreseeable future. And you're too dumb to realize it. That is the hilarious thing about you

There is no such thing as the women's vote. Republicans won 63% of white married female voters and they won 55% of married women voters of all races. Don't married women count as females in your world?

 

[Disir]

Ok. Look, the right has had ample time and now this is where the tire hits the road and .........you have nothing.

So, why in the hell would, I, as an independent voter give any individual on the right that is up for election the time of day?

You're not an independent at all. That's a joke. You've never voted for the GOP candidate, nor will you. Quit fooling yourself.

Every so-called independent, I have known, is really a sheep in wolves' clothing; a liberal.

Make no mistake. I have never lied. I am liberal. I'm Bernie Sander's Liberal.

For some reason you folks seem to think we aren't independent or that we aren't Democrats. Hello?

You mean Bernie Sanders, the self-described socialist???

Sanders, 73, of Vermont, is longest-serving independent in the U.S. Senate. He caucuses with the Democrats. But, as with New Coke, what it says on the label is nothing like what's in the can. Voters may read "independent" as "moderate," which is far off the mark for a guy who prefers the term "Democratic socialist."

There's nothing moderate about Sanders. He speaks of income inequality in the country as "immoral" and "dangerous. He calls for a massive government infrastructure rebuilding program to create jobs, plus raising the minimum wage even higher than the proposed $10.10 per hour.

He explains the phrase "Democratic socialist" by describing attributes of the democratic socialist states in Scandinavia: government-provided health, free college educations, generous family leave for new parents.

That means higher taxes — and Sanders has called for increasing estate taxes for the wealthiest Americans — but he notes Norway and Denmark rank among the happiest countries on Earth.

There s nothing moderate about Bernie Sanders

Ok. Look, the right has had ample time and now this is where the tire hits the road and .........you have nothing.

So, why in the hell would, I, as an independent voter give any individual on the right that is up for election the time of day?

You're not an independent at all. That's a joke. You've never voted for the GOP candidate, nor will you. Quit fooling yourself.

Every so-called independent, I have known, is really a sheep in wolves' clothing; a liberal.

Make no mistake. I have never lied. I am liberal. I'm Bernie Sander's Liberal.

For some reason you folks seem to think we aren't independent or that we aren't Democrats. Hello?

You mean Bernie Sanders, the self-described socialist???

Sanders, 73, of Vermont, is longest-serving independent in the U.S. Senate. He caucuses with the Democrats. But, as with New Coke, what it says on the label is nothing like what's in the can. Voters may read "independent" as "moderate," which is far off the mark for a guy who prefers the term "Democratic socialist."

There's nothing moderate about Sanders. He speaks of income inequality in the country as "immoral" and "dangerous. He calls for a massive government infrastructure rebuilding program to create jobs, plus raising the minimum wage even higher than the proposed $10.10 per hour.

He explains the phrase "Democratic socialist" by describing attributes of the democratic socialist states in Scandinavia: government-provided health, free college educations, generous family leave for new parents.

That means higher taxes — and Sanders has called for increasing estate taxes for the wealthiest Americans — but he notes Norway and Denmark rank among the happiest countries on Earth.

There s nothing moderate about Bernie Sanders

He's not a socialist. Not by a long shot. Even the socialists don't recognize him as a socialist.

 

[Disir]

Ok. Look, the right has had ample time and now this is where the tire hits the road and .........you have nothing.

So, why in the hell would, I, as an independent voter give any individual on the right that is up for election the time of day?

You're not an independent at all. That's a joke. You've never voted for the GOP candidate, nor will you. Quit fooling yourself.

Every so-called independent, I have known, is really a sheep in wolves' clothing; a liberal.

Make no mistake. I have never lied. I am liberal. I'm Bernie Sander's Liberal.

For some reason you folks seem to think we aren't independent or that we aren't Democrats. Hello?

Who accused you of lying? You just didn't fool us with your independent schtick

I am independent. I'm not a democrat. I'm more liberal than the Democrats. Yet, I'm not a socialist.

 

[candycorn]

Women, as a voting block are firmly in the Dem camp.

That's a complete mischaracterization. It's primarily the independent women who don't need a man and who have thus married the government that are firmly in the Democratic camp.

Romney won the white women's vote and he won the married women's vote. The women who want government to tax men and married people in order to get "free" birth control pills, you know, the "independent" women are the one's who voted for Obama.

It's a good thing to focus on the hypocrisy of "independent" women and shame them for being so dependent on government.

You're the textbook example of why the GOP has lost the women's vote for the foreseeable future. And you're too dumb to realize it. That is the hilarious thing about you

There is no such thing as the women's vote. Republicans won 63% of white married female voters and they won 55% of married women voters of all races. Don't married women count as females in your world?

A superior % of a dwindling demographic.... Please humor me some more.

 

[Disir]

And that was the Republicans first mistake and one that they will regret in time.

I thought it was an effective ad.

I can see why libs don't like it.

Given the Prog reaction, it as certainly struck a "noive"!

Not really. The problem is that it will be a market failure. It fails to address issues and then does exactly what it is accusing the Democrats of and in doing so makes the right look like morons simply because, again, Obama is not up for election and it reinforces the inaccurate propaganda that it tried to market before and with an audience that it fails to

There are only one of two target audiences. Right wing women or Democrats.

So, why spend money to target right wing women?

I'm a registered independent.

I disagree, the target audience are democrats/woman who voted Obama

We on the right were never duped to begin with

By equating it with a dating site, and operating as if Obama is up for re election? Again. That was the first mistake.

Obama represents his party. He's the best they have to offer. Plug someone else in there the results is the same. Hillary is no better. She worked inside the current administration and is part of the mentality that has infected Democrats. It doesn't matter who they nominate. Nothing changes.

No. This is why it's a marketing failure.

You (not you/you but in general you) are trying to sell me the exact same baseless rhetoric and in the same packaging.

And again, you would already bought that line for it to work.

It's worked before and it will work again. The opposition tries to weld a radiative president to his party and the party attempts to distance themselves by sounding more moderate.

I don't think this is going to bode well for them. I really don't.
The Republican plan to change the war on women narrative needs work Mobile Washington Examiner

And it's transparent.

 

[Disir]

And that was the Republicans first mistake and one that they will regret in time.

I thought it was an effective ad.

I can see why libs don't like it.

Effective for whom?

It is primarily condescending. The only people it will sell to is the group that is already sold. So, for the group that already believes that you have a win. For everyone else, it was alienating.

Shaming people is a tactic which works. Liberals shame people who reject associating with homosexuals. It's fair for Republicans to shame women who voted for Obama because they imagined him as their cool boyfriend and that means most women. They need to be shamed into thinking with their heads, not their hearts.

Like I said, that was the first mistake.

You guys had ample time to develop a game plan but it was more important to run around the internet and wreak havoc.

 

[candycorn]

And that was the Republicans first mistake and one that they will regret in time.

I thought it was an effective ad.

I can see why libs don't like it.

Given the Prog reaction, it as certainly struck a "noive"!

Not really. The problem is that it will be a market failure. It fails to address issues and then does exactly what it is accusing the Democrats of and in doing so makes the right look like morons simply because, again, Obama is not up for election and it reinforces the inaccurate propaganda that it tried to market before and with an audience that it fails to

I disagree, the target audience are democrats/woman who voted Obama

We on the right were never duped to begin with

By equating it with a dating site, and operating as if Obama is up for re election? Again. That was the first mistake.

Obama represents his party. He's the best they have to offer. Plug someone else in there the results is the same. Hillary is no better. She worked inside the current administration and is part of the mentality that has infected Democrats. It doesn't matter who they nominate. Nothing changes.

No. This is why it's a marketing failure.

You (not you/you but in general you) are trying to sell me the exact same baseless rhetoric and in the same packaging.

And again, you would already bought that line for it to work.

It's worked before and it will work again. The opposition tries to weld a radiative president to his party and the party attempts to distance themselves by sounding more moderate.

I don't think this is going to bode well for them. I really don't.
The Republican plan to change the war on women narrative needs work Mobile Washington Examiner

And it's transparent.

In the AAR that Prince and the "revolutionaries" did after the 332-206 shellacking, they only talked about re-packaging the same talking points. Of course it rings hollow. These people actually think they are right.

 

[Disir]

And that was the Republicans first mistake and one that they will regret in time.

I thought it was an effective ad.

I can see why libs don't like it.

Effective for whom?

It is primarily condescending. The only people it will sell to is the group that is already sold. So, for the group that already believes that you have a win. For everyone else, it was alienating.

Shaming people is a tactic which works. Liberals shame people who reject associating with homosexuals. It's fair for Republicans to shame women who voted for Obama because they imagined him as their cool boyfriend and that means most women. They need to be shamed into thinking with their heads, not their hearts.

Pfffttt............... You're an idiot.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Women, as a voting block are firmly in the Dem camp.

That's a complete mischaracterization. It's primarily the independent women who don't need a man and who have thus married the government that are firmly in the Democratic camp.

Romney won the white women's vote and he won the married women's vote. The women who want government to tax men and married people in order to get "free" birth control pills, you know, the "independent" women are the one's who voted for Obama.

It's a good thing to focus on the hypocrisy of "independent" women and shame them for being so dependent on government.

You're the textbook example of why the GOP has lost the women's vote for the foreseeable future. And you're too dumb to realize it. That is the hilarious thing about you

There is no such thing as the women's vote. Republicans won 63% of white married female voters and they won 55% of married women voters of all races. Don't married women count as females in your world?

A superior % of a dwindling demographic.... Please humor me some more.

Thank you for conceding that there is no women voter bloc. Please be honest in the future.

 

[Rikurzhen]

And that was the Republicans first mistake and one that they will regret in time.

I thought it was an effective ad.

I can see why libs don't like it.

Effective for whom?

It is primarily condescending. The only people it will sell to is the group that is already sold. So, for the group that already believes that you have a win. For everyone else, it was alienating.

Shaming people is a tactic which works. Liberals shame people who reject associating with homosexuals. It's fair for Republicans to shame women who voted for Obama because they imagined him as their cool boyfriend and that means most women. They need to be shamed into thinking with their heads, not their hearts.

Pfffttt............... You're an idiot.

Democrats captured 56% of the white single woman vote. Republicans captured 63% of the white married women vote.

Democrats have a greater hurdle to jump to push Republicans down to 49% of the married white women vote ( a 14% delta) than Republicans have in pushing Democrats down to a 49% share of the single white women vote (a 7% delta)

 

[Disir]

And that was the Republicans first mistake and one that they will regret in time.

I thought it was an effective ad.

I can see why libs don't like it.

Effective for whom?

It is primarily condescending. The only people it will sell to is the group that is already sold. So, for the group that already believes that you have a win. For everyone else, it was alienating.

Shaming people is a tactic which works. Liberals shame people who reject associating with homosexuals. It's fair for Republicans to shame women who voted for Obama because they imagined him as their cool boyfriend and that means most women. They need to be shamed into thinking with their heads, not their hearts.

Pfffttt............... You're an idiot.

Democrats captured 56% of the white single woman vote. Republicans captured 63% of the white married women vote.

Democrats have a greater hurdle to jump to push Republicans down to 49% of the married white women vote ( a 14% delta) than Republicans have in pushing Democrats down to a 49% share of the single white women vote (a 7% delta)

Go back and read your paragraph. Republicans have a much higher hurdle than you seem to think.