After the 7-Year Crusade Against Trump, Who Guessed A Biden Would Plead Guilty / Be Convicted Before Trump

He actually was charged with not paying the IRS in a timely manner, for taxes owed in 2017, 2018. The gun charge is still to be determined by the judge during his diversion program hearing. I don’t see how he will get out of a felony conviction on the gun charge, unless there are discretionary powers the judge has to either reduce the charge, give a suspended sentence, or dismiss the charge upon successful completion of the diversion program.
I got the impression, the whole deal had to be signed off on by the Judge, whoever that is. I have heard of criminal diversion deals before, but usually on youthful first time offenders. It is a Federal Judge and they can usually do with a case, most anything they chose as long as they do not go above sentencing guidelines or action does not violate the rights of a defendant, opening the case up for appeal by defendant. Since the prosecutor is the one that made the deal, the prosecutor is unlikely to appeal. So, if the judge buys it, its a done deal.
 
Still didn’t get me!



57ebbdc6b0ef971d008b8971

The fact that THIS is what you have to brag about regarding Hillary and tge Democrats is pathetic ... like you.
 
That's both ironic and funny as hell.

View attachment 796988

Democrats, the leftist MSM, snowflakes, trolls, and bots must be losing their minds trying to spin this and distract with 'whatabout'-isms.

View attachment 796991


Took 3 to 5 years on Hunter since Giuliani's first accusations against him back in 2018.

Trump could not be prosecuted while a sitting president, 4 years were inactionable, so only from Jan 20th 2021 till May of this year for his first indictment....his second indictment in June and his third indictment in Georgia will likely be July, and who knows on his seditious conspiracy charges.....which are the most important ones out of all imo....And the only trial I'd like to see... That's actually less time than it took for Hunter.
 
Took 3 to 5 years on Hunter since Giuliani's first accusations against him back in 2018.

Trump could not be prosecuted while a sitting president, 4 years were inactionable, so only from Jan 20th 2021 till May of this year for his first indictment....his second indictment in June and his third indictment in Georgia will likely be July, and who knows on his seditious conspiracy charges.....which are the most important ones out of all imo....And the only trial I'd like to see... That's actually less time than it took for Hunter.


Blah, blah, blah ...

All I hear are desperate, frantic excuses why after 7 years of 'Get Trump' a Biden pleads guilty / is prosecuted 1st...

:itsok:


.
 
It’s just fun to see y’all triggered. :biggrin:

You must be looking in a mirror, snowflake.

You guys are losing your shit about a Biden pleading guilty / being prosecuted 1st after 7 failed years of 'Get Trump'.

:auiqs.jpg:

.
 
Blah, blah, blah ...

All I hear are desperate, frantic excuses why after 7 years of 'Get Trump' a Biden pleads guilty / is prosecuted 1st...
Don’t worry, we haven’t forgotten about Donny boy.
 
Blah, blah, blah ...

All I hear are desperate, frantic excuses why after 7 years of 'Get Trump' a Biden pleads guilty / is prosecuted 1st...

:itsok:


.
yeah. always awkward that. maybe try less lying, shillbot..
 
I got the impression, the whole deal had to be signed off on by the Judge, whoever that is. I have heard of criminal diversion deals before, but usually on youthful first time offenders. It is a Federal Judge and they can usually do with a case, most anything they chose as long as they do not go above sentencing guidelines or action does not violate the rights of a defendant, opening the case up for appeal by defendant. Since the prosecutor is the one that made the deal, the prosecutor is unlikely to appeal. So, if the judge buys it, its a done deal.

Just read this from NBC News

WASHINGTON — The charges brought against President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden are rarely prosecuted, legal experts say.

Under a plea deal reached with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware — an office headed by Donald Trump appointee David Weiss — Hunter Biden will plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges of failing to pay taxes, which he later reimbursed. Biden also faces a felony gun charge — possession of a firearm by a person who is an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” — but it is likely to be dismissed if he meets certain conditions under the plea agreement, according to court documents.

The federal gun charge, which makes it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a weapon, is a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges and has recently been used as a catch-all charge against white supremacists.

Like the gun charge, the tax charges are rarely brought against first-time offenders and even more rarely result in jail time, Andrew Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel and NBC News contributor, tweeted Tuesday. "This is if anything harsh, not lenient," he wrote.

Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti agreed. "It insults the intelligence of the American people to compare misdemeanor tax charges to a scheme to steal Top Secret documents and obstruct justice when the government asked for them back," he tweeted, comparing the charges against Hunter Biden to the recent federal indictmentagainst former President Donald Trump. "If anything, Hunter Biden was treated harshly — those crimes are rarely charged."

The gun charge itself is under legal threat. A federal appeals court ruled in June that the government cannot ban those convicted of nonviolent crimes from possessing a weapon, and a federal court in Texas recently ruled — following a major Supreme Court case last year that expanded gun rights — that the ban on drug users possessing weapons violates the Second Amendment.

The charge, when brought, has often been used in high-profile cases where the underlying conduct doesn't violate any obvious federal criminal statute. Last week, the mother of a 6-year-old boy who shot his teacher in Newport News, Virginia, pleaded guilty to the charge — possessing a firearm while using marijuana — along with a charge of making a false statement.

The charge has resulted in serious prison time in other cases. A 23-year-old from Waterloo, Iowa, was recently sentenced to nearly five years in federal prison for possession as a drug user, while another 23-year-old in Lincoln, Nebraska, received three years in federal prison on the charge. Other sentences have not been as harsh: A man arrested during a burglary call in Vermont in May 2022 received a sentence of time served in March 2023. (There are undoubtedly other recent cases; but those that resulted in nonsubstantial sentences are also less likely to be mentioned in press releases issued by U.S. Attorney's Offices.)

The charge has also recently been used against white supremacists when their conduct did not provide an obvious violation of any other criminal statute, including against a white supremacist who was arrested in D.C. and found with a stash of weapons after his brother died by suicide. In that case, a federal public defender who had been working for 30 years said he “never had a case in which the government went forward" with the addict-in-possession charge. A judge concurred that the charge was unusual. The white supremacist was ultimately sentenced to time served after less than a year behind bars.

Chuck Rosenberg, a former top federal prosecutor and acting administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and a current NBC News legal analyst, noted that the addict-in-possession charge is used "sparingly," but said that did not mean it was used improperly in Hunter Biden's case, as each case needed to be evaluated on the individual evidence.

Paul Butler, a former federal prosecutor and an NBC News legal analyst, said on MSNBC on Tuesday that the deal Hunter Biden reached was a decent outcome for the president's son, but not the "sweetheart deal" that Trump and his allies have made it out to be.

While the plea agreement spells out that prosecutors will recommend a probationary sentence, the federal judge who ultimately sentences Hunter Biden is not bound to that agreement and could ultimately decide that the charge warrants incarceration. Court dates have not yet been set in the case.
 
Blah, blah, blah ...

All I hear are desperate, frantic excuses why after 7 years of 'Get Trump' a Biden pleads guilty / is prosecuted 1st...

:itsok:


.
Because you went after him full force, to hurt his dad, and Hunter is not in government, and President Biden did not interfere nor obstruct justice.
 
7 years of repeated, continuous failure has proven that.
Hey, there’s been a lot of stuff to go through over the years, but don’t worry, there are more charges pending.
 
A guilty plea on 2 misdemeanor counts of Tax Evasion or two different years and a weapon charge diversion for lying about drug use? It does not surprise me a bit. Actually, it sounds like he has a pretty good lawyer to get the deal and get it signed. Trump should hire his lawyer.
Not the lawyer that might have done it, but the DOJ whose leader could have been of SCOTUS.

Thank you Trump and McConnell!
Because you went after him full force, to hurt his dad, and Hunter is not in government, and President Biden did not interfere nor obstruct justice.
Wanna bet?
 
'The charge has also recently been used against white supremacists when their conduct did not provide an obvious violation of any other criminal statute'

So if snowflakes are saying there are no more criminal charges to indict Hunter on, are they claiming / admitting Hunter is a WHITE SUPREMACIST?

:dunno:

:auiqs.jpg:

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top