Diversity is code for NO Whites.Yep. The general wants more diverse applicants and in general just more applications.nobody is saying any decision should be made based on race.diversity. heterogeneous.
now, quote us
Truly dishonest.
It doesn't mean in height, or political outlook, or favorite baseball team.
It means skin color.
Why won't you admit that?
And...once admitting it, and if you had an education, you might quote LBJ....
"You do not take a man who for years has been hobbled by chains, liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race, saying, "you are free to compete with all the others," and still justly believe you have been completely fair... This is the next and more profound stage of the battle for civil rights. We seek not just freedom but opportunity—not just legal equity but human ability—not just equality as a right and a theory, but equality as a fact and as a result."
That's eloquent....but wrong.
Instead, you'd rather lie about it.....hence, you must know it's wrong, too.
So...how long have you been a Liberal?
you are imagining that.
Running from the truth as you are, it's clear that, both...
a. you know that 'diversity' means skin color
b. you know it's wrong as a doctrine for society.
I'll leave it at that.
What is wrong with that? Why do you insist a decision would be made based on skin color?
No matter how one views it, using one's skin color as a determiner of job preference is not an American value.
That applies to Roger Taney, Lyndon Johnson, Al Sharpton and every race hustler, i.e., Democrat Liberal.