Alan D. Trumps defense lawyer....should be fired from Harvard, he's a nut

[yidnar]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

Uh....no.

Dershowitz loves the limelight. So much so it makes him take dumb positions.

Firing him for that is not right.

I don't see anything "dumb" about the position that the Persecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt?

That's what our system is based on.

BTW, Professor Dershowitz is an ultraliberal, who voted for Clinton's Old Lady in 2016

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

 

[Kilroy2]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

well you can disagree with what he says but in the end he is an an advocate for his client

Ken Starr, he went after Clinton and now he defends Trump

Making arguments for trump using the same arguments that he used with Clinton in the past

It must be confusing to be a lawyer but then again I hear they are paid well

to look both ways

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

Sure, Dershowitz is nuts....

The Drexel professor who tweeted, 'All I want for Christmas is white genocide' resigned

 

[Billiejeens]

Uh....no.

Dershowitz loves the limelight. So much so it makes him take dumb positions.

Firing him for that is not right.

I don't see anything "dumb" about the position that the Persecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt?

That's what our system is based on.

BTW, Professor Dershowitz is an ultraliberal, who voted for Clinton's Old Lady in 2016

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

He will not understand any of those words.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

Progressive Fascism does not tolerate dissenting opinions

 

[Oldstyle]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

Didn't you get the memo that Barry went to Harvard Law School, Tiger! OMG...there are black students there too? Unbelievable!!! (eye roll)

 

[Wapasha]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets.

Do you have any credentials when it comes to US law, or are you just THAT dumb that you would make ignorant proclamations about it? This guy is a legendary Harvard law professor. What the fuck would you know about any of this?

Just - 0range Man Bad

 

[Wapasha]

Democrats can't stand other peoples opinions. They're bigots

This coming from a guy who supports a clown who fires anybody that doesn't suckle on his nuts, next?

There are a lot of porn videos of nut suckling, so it must be an important factor for some folks.

The problem you people have is:

when a Republican is President - Down is Up
when a Democrat is President - Up is Down
when a Republican is President - Down is Up
when a Democrat is President - Up is Down

and anyone who does not flip and flop according to your views - they must be eliminated, banned, silenced, stripped of credentials, and ostracized.

don't you ever ask yourself:

1) Where is the impeachment charge against Trump for violating the Emoluments Clause?

2) Where is the impeachment charge against Trump for colluding with the Russians??

3) Where is the impeachment charge against Trump for obstruction of justice with the Mueller investigation???

4) Where is the impeachment charge against Trump for firing Director Comey????

5) Where is the impeachment charge against Trump for violating Federal law by asking the Russians if they can find Hilary's 30k missing emails, which prohibits campaigns from soliciting or accepting anything of value from a foreign national

etc....

 

[Billiejeens]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

Didn't you get the memo that Barry went to Harvard Law School, Tiger! OMG...there are black students there too? Unbelievable!!! (eye roll)

Thanks Quota System!

 

[22lcidw]

Dershowitz has made a career out of defending criminals who are guilty of the crimes he is defending them against.

Donald Trump is guilty and Dershowitz will say anything to obscure Trump's guilt.

Dershowitz is a Democrat. Perhaps not a total Prog. And he has had questionable defenses. Trump is not one of them. You don't like him now. Trump knows how to ingratiate people. You guys are the flies in the ointment because you don't like anything good that does not promote your agendas. Trump is the bug spray applied to you while your in the ointment.

 

[Harry Dresden]

did nadler show all that overwhelming evidence he said they had?....just asking....

 

[Faun]

Uh....no.

Dershowitz loves the limelight. So much so it makes him take dumb positions.

Firing him for that is not right.

I don't see anything "dumb" about the position that the Persecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt?

That's what our system is based on.

BTW, Professor Dershowitz is an ultraliberal, who voted for Clinton's Old Lady in 2016

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

Your brain is fried. Neither Hillary nor the DNC paid a foreign national. They paid Fusion GPS, an American firm.

 

[Faun]

I don't see anything "dumb" about the position that the Persecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt?

That's what our system is based on.

BTW, Professor Dershowitz is an ultraliberal, who voted for Clinton's Old Lady in 2016

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

He will not understand any of those words.

Poor, demented rightie.

 

[Billiejeens]

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

He will not understand any of those words.

Poor, demented rightie.

Poor buffoon retard.

 

[yidnar]

I don't see anything "dumb" about the position that the Persecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt?

That's what our system is based on.

BTW, Professor Dershowitz is an ultraliberal, who voted for Clinton's Old Lady in 2016

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

Your brain is fried. Neither Hillary nor the DNC paid a foreign national. They paid Fusion GPS, an American firm.

lol! soooo that makes it totally legal and fine ! so if you pay someone to pay someone to commit a crime its not a crime ! ooohhhh yesss ! thats the Washington establishment good ole boy way !

 

[Correll]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

So, what do you have to support your thread premise, or are you just having a hissy fit?

 

[Polishprince]

I don't see anything "dumb" about the position that the Persecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt?

That's what our system is based on.

BTW, Professor Dershowitz is an ultraliberal, who voted for Clinton's Old Lady in 2016

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

Your brain is fried. Neither Hillary nor the DNC paid a foreign national. They paid Fusion GPS, an American firm.

Just because there were buffers in between the Democrat Party Mob Bosses and foreign agent Chris Steele doesn't absolve her of responsibility at all. And if, God Forbid, the D's take the WH this fall, there will be investigations and special persecutors assigned to make sure that its looked into.

 

[Oldstyle]

It is absolutely unbelievable the hog shit Alan is spewing in defense of the boy king, ie Trump. And the fact this man is teaching young white boys and girls and Asians criminal law at Harvard should disturb parents and tax payers who are dropping serious money at this school and in his pockets. Donald Trump the most corrupt man ever to step foot in the white house, has a defense lawyer defending and deflecting his crimes not only on Rudy and all envolved, but Obama too? And to suggest, Trump gives a fuck about crooks, liars and thieves in Urkrane, when he not only finds them appealing and pleasurable to embrace and support, his entire administration, his GOP lap dogs and he himself along with his family....REEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKSSS OF those very indiscretions...its just appalling.

May Kobe and the other victims rest in peace and all networks should shut this shit down and show paint drying for the next few days!!


Trump Defense Can't Offer Evidence He Cared About Corruption Before Biden 2020 Run | HuffPost

Alan Dershowitz’s latest defense of Trump would let presidents get away with almost anything

Didn't you get the memo that Barry went to Harvard Law School, Tiger! OMG...there are black students there too? Unbelievable!!! (eye roll)

Thanks Quota System!

Racist!!!

 

[Faun]

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

He will not understand any of those words.

Poor, demented rightie.

Poor buffoon retard.

 

[Faun]

That is a legal theory in court but this is trial is not in court.

So what does that mean?


Is it your legal theory, that the House Managers, the Persecution in this case, don't have to prove their case at all and the mere repetition of allegations is enough for a conviction?

Under those circumstances, why would the libs need witnesses or documents at all? They already had enough innuendo for a conviction in their view. In fact libs were calling for impeachment even before the Perfect Phone Call. Hell, Jeff Bezos' Washington Post called for Trump's removal from office less than a half hour after he took the oath.

That's true, they don't actually have to prove their case to get a conviction. The Senate is free to vote how they want. Which is why the Senate will acquit Impeached Trump despite the evidence he solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival of his.

you mean like Hillary and the dnc did. not only did they solicite a foreign agent they paid for false info to get a fisa warrant to spy !

Your brain is fried. Neither Hillary nor the DNC paid a foreign national. They paid Fusion GPS, an American firm.

lol! soooo that makes it totally legal and fine ! so if you pay someone to pay someone to commit a crime its not a crime ! ooohhhh yesss ! thats the Washington establishment good ole boy way !

It means they didn't do what you idiotically claimed they did.

Savvy?