Aleppo fail redux: TEAM HILLARY CHIEF can’t answer the question either!

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,149
'Joe Scarborough wondered aloud why campaign manager Robby Mook bothered to appear on the show at all to discuss debate prep this week after Mook sloughed off Mike Barnicle’s question on Aleppo — nearly the same question that stumped the Libertarian nominee earlier this month. Mook tried to dodge it by claiming it to be a new issue, which left Scarborough’s jaw hanging even lower'...

Mook dodged the questions, could not answer them, has no clue what Hillary believes / has planned... WONDER IF SHE KNOWS! Maybe this is why they are going to cancel the debate. :p


Aleppo fail redux: Team Hillary chief can’t answer the question either - Hot Air
 
Trump has no better an answer.

This is an UN issue, and if it can't handle it with Russia, the US, France, Turkey, and Iraq as major players, then we are all worthless.
 
She doesn't have to do anything to still win.

The best thing we can do is set up a Constitutional grievance and grand jury system that is managed directly by the people per party and state. Where the people retain and exercise ability to check govt, corporations, media and parties against abuses, regardless who serves inside or outside govt.
 
Trump has no better an answer.

This is an UN issue, and if it can't handle it with Russia, the US, France, Turkey, and Iraq as major players, then we are all worthless.
Trump has no better answer - really? Link proving that?

A 'UN issue', huh - like their refugees?
 
Trump has no better an answer.

This is an UN issue, and if it can't handle it with Russia, the US, France, Turkey, and Iraq as major players, then we are all worthless.

UN has always been corrupt and worthless. Peacekeepers raping local women and the oil for food scandal are among the the corruption of that useless organization.
 
Trump has no better an answer.

This is an UN issue, and if it can't handle it with Russia, the US, France, Turkey, and Iraq as major players, then we are all worthless.

P.S. We also could look into separating the top executive offices
into two each: Internal and External.
Not every leader who can strategize with military and international decisions
specializes in domestic issues, and vice versa.

National security and global finance and relations should be
a full time focus -- separate from domestic issues that involve States.

If we split the Executive Branch into two separate positions
for Internal and External, we could create jobs for leaders from
both major parties representing the majority of public interests,
instead of competing for the same offices with candidates
who don't have equal ability to cover all roles. Why not elect
the best people for the best jobs suited for their expertise and leadership?
 
ColonelAngus
Trump has no better an answer.

This is an UN issue, and if it can't handle it with Russia, the US, France, Turkey, and Iraq as major players, then we are all worthless.

UN has always been corrupt and worthless. Peacekeepers raping local women and the oil for food scandal are among the the corruption of that useless organization.

Why not teach all citizens, leaders, institutions, and corporations to follow
the same standards as in the Constitutional process and Code of Ethics:
ethics-commission.net

if we all agreed to common principles and language like the Bill of Rights,
then we'd either enforce these consistently or SCREEN OUT people
who are unable to comply with due process of laws and equal protection, representation, and consent of the governed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top