usmbguest5318
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2017
- 10,923
- 1,635
- Thread starter
- #41
On the probative spectrum having endpoints of "(incontrovertibly) proven" and "(incontrovertibly) disproven/debunked," everything between the those two extremes has some measure of uncertainty.So wait, just so we can all be crystal clear on your position here:
Are you actually trying to argue that Roy Moore is not a creepy pedophile?
You have evidence that Moore is a pedophile?
Yes, a whole lot of circumstantial evidence. If you would like him to spend an evening with your 14 year old daughter...by all means, get her that bus ticket and help her pack.
There ya go, the dude just admitted he has nothing.
In what universe is circumstantial evidence, "nothing"? Only in the addled mind of a desperate sycophant trying to protect his favorite pedophile du jour.
Your evidence has been examined and debunked.......
I know you have this perverted notion that, for some odd reason, you appear to want a child molested, but this dog ain't gonna hunt and you will have to accept it. Ask your therapist to help you through this. I am serious, he can help!