Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are right, Trump broke no laws, at least as far as the 1995 tax returns are concerned, but where are the rest of them? What is Trump hiding and afraid to show to the American people? Your answer???Trump broke no laws. The NYT and rest of the media is structuring it as if he did. However, turns out that the NYT and other Clinton operatives may have broke the law in how they obtained the Clinton returns.
history says there was no crash in 95So now you're saying that the stock market crash in 95' never happened.You're a God Damned liar.Trumps ONLY qualification is that he is supposed to be an amazing businessman. Someone who lost a billion dollars in one year
He claims not paying taxes makes him smart
How smart do you have to be to lose a billion dollars?
It won't be long before all of Trump's losses in the nineties will be blamed on Bill Clinton.
I did very well in the 90s
What happened to Trump?
95 was a terrible year in the market.
Maybe in your country.
You're lucky you aren't standing in front of me right now.
I lost half of my savings in my 401k during that crash, you FUCK!!
I don't care for Trump. His candidacy's only appeal to me is how he scares the crap out of the powers-that-be (both Republicans and Democrats) who have really screwed up this country. Thus these stories about his taxes never got a rise out of me. This latest development only goes to show the lengths those empowered are willing to go to prevent Americans from taking their country back.
I'm not all that trusting of Trump and see him more as a con artist. Yet I'm still undecided. Which only goes to show how little faith I have in Hillary's vision for America. However, I do hear that unlike most politicians she works well with members of both parties. But then again I think of them as equal opportunity organizations out to screw American. I usually resolve things by voting 3rd party, but I'm really trying to avoid that this year.
It's compulsive but that's close enough.This site is literally packed with convulsive liars.
since they don't financially benefit from the foundation how is it anything but charity?Here's why dimocraps are such SCUM. (among many other reasons)
First, the New Yawk SLIMES obtained those records ILLEGALLY.
Second, they presented them with THEIR EXPLANATION. They made them say what THEY wanted them to say.
Had Trump been able to present the Tax Returns with an explanation, this would be a different discussion.... Although, dimocrap scum are too stupid to understand Tax Returns (most of them don't file anyway) someone could explain them to dimocraps in crayon.
The SLIMES really needs to be brought to heel over this. What they did is a CRIME.
And every penny that Trump deucted was legal. During the Clinton Administration, you can bet they had fifty IRS Tax Lawyers going over those returns with a magnifying glass
I would certainly like someone to ask Hillary what this donation that was taken as a write off was about!!!
Seems kind of self serving to donate $1 million to a foundation named after yourself then take a tax deduction! How does that look?
View attachment 91860
you must have evidence nobody else does to believe the Clintons benefit financially from their foundation.Oh wow.since they don't financially benefit from the foundation how is it anything but charity?Here's why dimocraps are such SCUM. (among many other reasons)
First, the New Yawk SLIMES obtained those records ILLEGALLY.
Second, they presented them with THEIR EXPLANATION. They made them say what THEY wanted them to say.
Had Trump been able to present the Tax Returns with an explanation, this would be a different discussion.... Although, dimocrap scum are too stupid to understand Tax Returns (most of them don't file anyway) someone could explain them to dimocraps in crayon.
The SLIMES really needs to be brought to heel over this. What they did is a CRIME.
And every penny that Trump deucted was legal. During the Clinton Administration, you can bet they had fifty IRS Tax Lawyers going over those returns with a magnifying glass
I would certainly like someone to ask Hillary what this donation that was taken as a write off was about!!!
Seems kind of self serving to donate $1 million to a foundation named after yourself then take a tax deduction! How does that look?
View attachment 91860
when the times runs for president let us knowThe New York Times doesn't pay taxes either:
But the Times itself has “avoided” paying taxes — in 2014, for example.
As Forbes noted at the time:
… for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the statement again.
The New York Times Paid No Taxes in 2014 - Breitbart
Trump is a crook? Is Hillary some kind of angel? Why is only Trump worthy of your attention? The answer is that you're a douche bag Hillary apologist.
They used it for travel for one. My guess is it wasn't economy flights or accommodations but you are free to live in your bubble. This while she was being paid out of our pockets.you mist have evidence nobody else does to believe the Clintons benefit financially from their foundation.Oh wow.since they don't financially benefit from the foundation how is it anything but charity?Here's why dimocraps are such SCUM. (among many other reasons)
First, the New Yawk SLIMES obtained those records ILLEGALLY.
Second, they presented them with THEIR EXPLANATION. They made them say what THEY wanted them to say.
Had Trump been able to present the Tax Returns with an explanation, this would be a different discussion.... Although, dimocrap scum are too stupid to understand Tax Returns (most of them don't file anyway) someone could explain them to dimocraps in crayon.
The SLIMES really needs to be brought to heel over this. What they did is a CRIME.
And every penny that Trump deucted was legal. During the Clinton Administration, you can bet they had fifty IRS Tax Lawyers going over those returns with a magnifying glass
I would certainly like someone to ask Hillary what this donation that was taken as a write off was about!!!
Seems kind of self serving to donate $1 million to a foundation named after yourself then take a tax deduction! How does that look?
View attachment 91860
i mean it's not like the clinton's were cutting checks out of the chaarity's account to settle personal and business lawsuits
When you grow a brain, let us know.when the times runs for president let us knowThe New York Times doesn't pay taxes either:
But the Times itself has “avoided” paying taxes — in 2014, for example.
As Forbes noted at the time:
… for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the statement again.
The New York Times Paid No Taxes in 2014 - Breitbart
Doesn't it bother you that trump thinks he is smart for not paying taxes? What does that say about the rest of us dummies?when the times runs for president let us knowThe New York Times doesn't pay taxes either:
But the Times itself has “avoided” paying taxes — in 2014, for example.
As Forbes noted at the time:
… for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the statement again.
The New York Times Paid No Taxes in 2014 - Breitbart
yes, we do. the clintons have never received a dime from their foundationsince they don't financially benefit from the foundation how is it anything but charity?Here's why dimocraps are such SCUM. (among many other reasons)
First, the New Yawk SLIMES obtained those records ILLEGALLY.
Second, they presented them with THEIR EXPLANATION. They made them say what THEY wanted them to say.
Had Trump been able to present the Tax Returns with an explanation, this would be a different discussion.... Although, dimocrap scum are too stupid to understand Tax Returns (most of them don't file anyway) someone could explain them to dimocraps in crayon.
The SLIMES really needs to be brought to heel over this. What they did is a CRIME.
And every penny that Trump deucted was legal. During the Clinton Administration, you can bet they had fifty IRS Tax Lawyers going over those returns with a magnifying glass
I would certainly like someone to ask Hillary what this donation that was taken as a write off was about!!!
Seems kind of self serving to donate $1 million to a foundation named after yourself then take a tax deduction! How does that look?
View attachment 91860
Again... we DON"T know how the Clintons or their staff have financially benefited!
Hillary has released her tax returns for the past ten years. Trump refuses to, so what does he have to hide? Let him prove he isn't a crook by releasing his returns.
lol. that is the best you can do. wow.When you grow a brain, let us know.when the times runs for president let us knowThe New York Times doesn't pay taxes either:
But the Times itself has “avoided” paying taxes — in 2014, for example.
As Forbes noted at the time:
… for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the statement again.
The New York Times Paid No Taxes in 2014 - Breitbart
I said let us know when you grow a brain. This is obviously not that time.lol. that is the best you can do. wow.When you grow a brain, let us know.when the times runs for president let us knowThe New York Times doesn't pay taxes either:
But the Times itself has “avoided” paying taxes — in 2014, for example.
As Forbes noted at the time:
… for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the statement again.
The New York Times Paid No Taxes in 2014 - Breitbart
Bottom Line: He has not released his taxes. We do not know who his creditors are or how much debt they own.
He is also a bully, a neo fascist, as are those who support him, and Trump is a demagogue, a charlatan and psychologically unfit to be POTUS.
when the times runs for president let us knowThe New York Times doesn't pay taxes either:
But the Times itself has “avoided” paying taxes — in 2014, for example.
As Forbes noted at the time:
… for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the statement again.
The New York Times Paid No Taxes in 2014 - Breitbart
Bottom line, guilty until proven innocent. The fact that you hate him so much makes him the best pick possible.Bottom Line: He has not released his taxes. We do not know who his creditors are or how much debt they own.
He is also a bully, a neo fascist, as are those who support him, and Trump is a demagogue, a charlatan and psychologically unfit to be POTUS.
