Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

[colfax_m]

I dont see where he said that in the drop down,,,

Keep going back.

why dont you just tell me???

Because I assume you are literate enough to read the thread.

Are you?

 

[progressive hunter]

They rules aren’t being applied equally. Otherwise you’d be attacking amazon for being a fascist OR defending baker for deciding not to participate.

Discrimination based on identity is wrong. Discrimination based on actions is not.

If you refuse service to a black man because he’s black, it’s wrong. If you refuse service to a black man because he harasses the staff, it’s okay.

Refusing to serve a gay couple because they’re gay is wrong. Refusing to sell a book because the book is offensive to millions of people is fine.

you are aware that both the 1st A and free speech is for protecting words you find offensive

Who or what does the first amendment protect those words from?

thats not what I said,,,

its not about who is protected,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

I dont see where he said that in the drop down,,,

Keep going back.

why dont you just tell me???

Because I assume you are literate enough to read the thread.

Are you?

well you obviously arent literate enough,,,

 

[colfax_m]

They rules aren’t being applied equally. Otherwise you’d be attacking amazon for being a fascist OR defending baker for deciding not to participate.

Discrimination based on identity is wrong. Discrimination based on actions is not.

If you refuse service to a black man because he’s black, it’s wrong. If you refuse service to a black man because he harasses the staff, it’s okay.

Refusing to serve a gay couple because they’re gay is wrong. Refusing to sell a book because the book is offensive to millions of people is fine.

you are aware that both the 1st A and free speech is for protecting words you find offensive

Who or what does the first amendment protect those words from?

thats not what I said,,,

its not about who is protected,,,

I didn’t ask who is protected.

What did I change?

 

[colfax_m]

well you obviously arent literate enough,,,

I’m not the one pestering others to read posts for them.

 

[Mac-7]

So if Amazon stops selling a book, the person stops believing it?

Citizens must b3 free to share ideas

Amazon is suppressing that freedom

 

[progressive hunter]

They rules aren’t being applied equally. Otherwise you’d be attacking amazon for being a fascist OR defending baker for deciding not to participate.

Discrimination based on identity is wrong. Discrimination based on actions is not.

If you refuse service to a black man because he’s black, it’s wrong. If you refuse service to a black man because he harasses the staff, it’s okay.

Refusing to serve a gay couple because they’re gay is wrong. Refusing to sell a book because the book is offensive to millions of people is fine.

you are aware that both the 1st A and free speech is for protecting words you find offensive

Who or what does the first amendment protect those words from?

thats not what I said,,,

its not about who is protected,,,

I didn’t ask who is protected.

What did I change?

yes you did,,

they are for protecting speech you may find offensive,,,

 

[colfax_m]

So if Amazon stops selling a book, the person stops believing it?

Citizens must b3 free to share ideas

Amazon is suppressing that freedom

Amazon has freedom too, you know. Your freedom cannot impinge on theirs.

 

[progressive hunter]

So if Amazon stops selling a book, the person stops believing it?

Citizens must b3 free to share ideas

Amazon is suppressing that freedom

Amazon has freedom too, you know. Your freedom cannot impinge on theirs.

doesnt mean they arent censoring speech,,,

 

[colfax_m]

They rules aren’t being applied equally. Otherwise you’d be attacking amazon for being a fascist OR defending baker for deciding not to participate.

Discrimination based on identity is wrong. Discrimination based on actions is not.

If you refuse service to a black man because he’s black, it’s wrong. If you refuse service to a black man because he harasses the staff, it’s okay.

Refusing to serve a gay couple because they’re gay is wrong. Refusing to sell a book because the book is offensive to millions of people is fine.

you are aware that both the 1st A and free speech is for protecting words you find offensive

Who or what does the first amendment protect those words from?

thats not what I said,,,

its not about who is protected,,,

I didn’t ask who is protected.

What did I change?

yes you did,,

they are for protecting speech you may find offensive,,,

I didn’t. Jesus, you actually are illiterate.

 

[colfax_m]

doesnt mean they arent censoring speech,,,

So not participating is censorship again? That seems to change from time to time with you.

 

[progressive hunter]

They rules aren’t being applied equally. Otherwise you’d be attacking amazon for being a fascist OR defending baker for deciding not to participate.

Discrimination based on identity is wrong. Discrimination based on actions is not.

If you refuse service to a black man because he’s black, it’s wrong. If you refuse service to a black man because he harasses the staff, it’s okay.

Refusing to serve a gay couple because they’re gay is wrong. Refusing to sell a book because the book is offensive to millions of people is fine.

you are aware that both the 1st A and free speech is for protecting words you find offensive

Who or what does the first amendment protect those words from?

thats not what I said,,,

its not about who is protected,,,

I didn’t ask who is protected.

What did I change?

yes you did,,

they are for protecting speech you may find offensive,,,

I didn’t. Jesus, you actually are illiterate.

you didnt what??

 

[Dana7360]

a PDF or what ever that is is not a reliable source

Did you happen to look at what the linked documents?

No that trump person didn't.

They never do. Even when they demand proof.

You can fill message boxes full of links of credible proof.

The trump people won't read it.

 

[progressive hunter]

doesnt mean they arent censoring speech,,,

So not participating is censorship again? That seems to change from time to time with you.

I'm all for choice in participation,, its you that has a one way street on it,,,

I believe both amazon and the baker have a choice whether to participate,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

doesnt mean they arent censoring speech,,,

So not participating is censorship again? That seems to change from time to time with you.

and amazon didnt choose to not read the books,, they chose to restrict other people the ability to read them,,

 

[Penelope]

so why are you here???

To point out your hypocrisy. Amazon is fascist for not participating. The baker is righteous for doing the same thing.

well history proves to us one of the first steps to fascism is to stifle opposing views,,,

and the bakeer didnt do that,, they chose to not participate,,,

Tramp is a master at it, opposing other views.

 

[progressive hunter]

so why are you here???

To point out your hypocrisy. Amazon is fascist for not participating. The baker is righteous for doing the same thing.

well history proves to us one of the first steps to fascism is to stifle opposing views,,,

and the bakeer didnt do that,, they chose to not participate,,,

Tramp is a master at it, opposing other views.

as an individual he has that right,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

so why are you here???

To point out your hypocrisy. Amazon is fascist for not participating. The baker is righteous for doing the same thing.

well history proves to us one of the first steps to fascism is to stifle opposing views,,,

and the bakeer didnt do that,, they chose to not participate,,,

Tramp is a master at it, opposing other views.

 

[colfax_m]

you didnt what??

I’m done. You honestly can’t expect me to constantly hold your hand because you keep getting so easily confused.

 

[colfax_m]

and amazon didnt choose to not read the books,, they chose to restrict other people the ability to read them,,

They chose not to participate in the sale of those books.