Mortimer
Gold Member
Do you see Russia as threat to global peace like often and traditionally since 70 years american official politics do since cold war and beyond? Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Putin does not play the game. He is a staunch nationalist in a globalist world. You dont play the game then you are marked a pariah and they will work to remove you.America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Putin does not play the game. He is a staunch nationalist in a globalist world. You dont play the game then you are marked a pariah and they will work to remove you.America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Your statement is not correct.Do you see Russia as threat to global peace like often and traditionally since 70 years american official politics do since cold war and beyond? Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Your statement is not correct.Do you see Russia as threat to global peace like often and traditionally since 70 years american official politics do since cold war and beyond? Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
There was peace between Russia and the USA during GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush.
It was Obama that fokked up the peace with Russia.
So think about this again, then restate your O/P.
Who is "we" ??America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Everybody loved Yeltzin. You are still wrong.Your statement is not correct.Do you see Russia as threat to global peace like often and traditionally since 70 years american official politics do since cold war and beyond? Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
There was peace between Russia and the USA during GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush.
It was Obama that fokked up the peace with Russia.
So think about this again, then restate your O/P.
not at all during clinton they bombed serbia and made fun of yeltzin etc. i dont know about bush old, but bush second did the same as every us president.
Who is "we" ??America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Do you have a mouse in your pocket ?!
Everybody loved Yeltzin. You are still wrong.Your statement is not correct.Do you see Russia as threat to global peace like often and traditionally since 70 years american official politics do since cold war and beyond? Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
There was peace between Russia and the USA during GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush.
It was Obama that fokked up the peace with Russia.
So think about this again, then restate your O/P.
not at all during clinton they bombed serbia and made fun of yeltzin etc. i dont know about bush old, but bush second did the same as every us president.
So fokking what ??? Yeltzin was funny.Everybody loved Yeltzin. You are still wrong.Your statement is not correct.Do you see Russia as threat to global peace like often and traditionally since 70 years american official politics do since cold war and beyond? Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
There was peace between Russia and the USA during GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush.
It was Obama that fokked up the peace with Russia.
So think about this again, then restate your O/P.
not at all during clinton they bombed serbia and made fun of yeltzin etc. i dont know about bush old, but bush second did the same as every us president.
not true. they made fun of him
Bullsh!t.Who is "we" ??America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Do you have a mouse in your pocket ?!
we are all humans, all people, every individual group and country has it in its own hands which represantives they elect, and those represantive have it in their hands which politics they make
Bullsh!t.Who is "we" ??America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Do you have a mouse in your pocket ?!
we are all humans, all people, every individual group and country has it in its own hands which represantives they elect, and those represantive have it in their hands which politics they make
Wash DC is totally out of control and therefore you is you and they is they and you have nothing in common with they.
So there is no "we" unless you have a mouse in your pocket.
It is unwise to speak for others.Bullsh!t.Who is "we" ??America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Do you have a mouse in your pocket ?!
we are all humans, all people, every individual group and country has it in its own hands which represantives they elect, and those represantive have it in their hands which politics they make
Wash DC is totally out of control and therefore you is you and they is they and you have nothing in common with they.
So there is no "we" unless you have a mouse in your pocket.
i didnt said i represent washington DC, i said everyone has the fate in his own hands, and for everyone i used the word "we" "we humans" its a general statement
It is unwise to speak for others.Bullsh!t.Who is "we" ??Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
Do you have a mouse in your pocket ?!
we are all humans, all people, every individual group and country has it in its own hands which represantives they elect, and those represantive have it in their hands which politics they make
Wash DC is totally out of control and therefore you is you and they is they and you have nothing in common with they.
So there is no "we" unless you have a mouse in your pocket.
i didnt said i represent washington DC, i said everyone has the fate in his own hands, and for everyone i used the word "we" "we humans" its a general statement
It is a lot smarter to simply speak for yourself.
Milk is white.It is unwise to speak for others.Bullsh!t.Who is "we" ??
Do you have a mouse in your pocket ?!
we are all humans, all people, every individual group and country has it in its own hands which represantives they elect, and those represantive have it in their hands which politics they make
Wash DC is totally out of control and therefore you is you and they is they and you have nothing in common with they.
So there is no "we" unless you have a mouse in your pocket.
i didnt said i represent washington DC, i said everyone has the fate in his own hands, and for everyone i used the word "we" "we humans" its a general statement
It is a lot smarter to simply speak for yourself.
its a general statement like milk is white, i can speak generally here
How did Obama change Russia and its wars when most of them haven't been with US?Your statement is not correct.Do you see Russia as threat to global peace like often and traditionally since 70 years american official politics do since cold war and beyond? Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
There was peace between Russia and the USA during GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush.
It was Obama that fokked up the peace with Russia.
So think about this again, then restate your O/P.
Putin does not play the game. He is a staunch nationalist in a globalist world. You dont play the game then you are marked a pariah and they will work to remove you.America will always regard other powers as a threat, it's the nature of the beast.Or you think russia is not a threat and could be friends with america?
Seems like a cheap excuse though, we have it in our hands how we deal with others though, if we strive for cooperation and peace or for confrontation, this explanation is not enough for me "its natural" etc.
To be honest Putin isnt really nationalist, a little bit maybe but more like civic nationalist. If he were more liberal and such, he would still be the enemy. I think as long russia is not completely subdued they will be the enemy.