An Anti-Israel President

[Polk]

Wrong Sunni boy her mother is a Eastern European Jew her father is a Syrian Jew not Arab sorry boy learn you lineage Jews are Jews through the mother not the father

Syrians are Arabs...

Did you read what I said? I don't think you did. Jews are Jews through the mother but here a lot of Jews expelled from Arab lands are they Arabs? No..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuq3GnOXXjg&feature=related]Silent Exodus - The Jewish Nakbah - YouTube[/ame]

Yes, the religious tradition traces lineage through the mother. That doesn't change the fact that her father is an Arab. He's an Arab Jew. Judaism is a religion, not an ethnic group. Same reason why if her mother was black, she could be both black and Jewish.

 

[Sunni Man]

The interests of the Egyptian people won't be served by open elections if they elect a bunch of kooks.

So we tell the Egyptian people how great democratic elections are.

Then you tell them who they need to elect so that Israel will be happy with the outcome.

What about what the Egyptian people?

If they want to be lead by the Muslim Brotherhood isn't that what democracy is all about?

Freedom to choose your leaders.

 

[Polk]

The interests of the Egyptian people won't be served by open elections if they elect a bunch of kooks.

So we tell the Egyptian people how great democratic elections are.

Then you tell them who they need to elect so that Israel will be happy with the outcome.

What about what the Egyptian people?

If they want to be lead by the Muslim Brotherhood isn't that what democracy is all about?

Freedom to choose your leaders.

It's not about Israel being happy with the outcome. It's about the possibility of electing a bunch of nutjobs who will stone women in the streets because they saw their ankles.

 

[Sunni Man]

It's not about Israel being happy with the outcome. It's about the possibility of electing a bunch of nutjobs who will stone women in the streets because they saw their ankles.

Then they need to keep their ankles covered or wear socks.

 

[Polk]

It's not about Israel being happy with the outcome. It's about the possibility of electing a bunch of nutjobs who will stone women in the streets because they saw their ankles.

Then they need to keep their ankles covered or wear socks.

Do you realize how crazy you sound?

 

[Sunni Man]

It's not about Israel being happy with the outcome. It's about the possibility of electing a bunch of nutjobs who will stone women in the streets because they saw their ankles.

Then they need to keep their ankles covered or wear socks.

Do you realize how crazy you sound?

A good muslim woman does not go around showing her bare ankles in public.

 

[Jroc]

Yes, the religious tradition traces lineage through the mother. That doesn't change the fact that her father is an Arab. He's an Arab Jew. Judaism is a religion, not an ethnic group. Same reason why if her mother was black, she could be both black and Jewish.

Wrong again Jews are Jews ethnically as well as religiously almost all can trace their origins genetically to the Mideast and the land of Israel they are related genetically to the Arabs from the Area Syrians, Lebanese Jordanians "Palestinians" ect... Oh and you can be an athiest and still be a Jew

 

[Sunni Man]

Yes, the religious tradition traces lineage through the mother. That doesn't change the fact that her father is an Arab. He's an Arab Jew. Judaism is a religion, not an ethnic group. Same reason why if her mother was black, she could be both black and Jewish.

Wrong again Jews are Jews ethnically as well as religiously almost all can trace their origins genetically to the Mideast and the land of Israel they are related genetically to the Arabs from the Area Syrians, Lebanese Jordanians "Palestinians" ect... Oh and you can be an athiest and still be a Jew

Zionist Jews love to claim that being Jew is a race.

That way when they disagree with someone.

Not only can they call the person anti-semitic.

They can also call them a racist.

True story

 

[Polk]

Yes, the religious tradition traces lineage through the mother. That doesn't change the fact that her father is an Arab. He's an Arab Jew. Judaism is a religion, not an ethnic group. Same reason why if her mother was black, she could be both black and Jewish.

Wrong again Jews are Jews ethnically as well as religiously almost all can trace their origins genetically to the Mideast and the land of Israel they are related genetically to the Arabs from the Area Syrians, Lebanese Jordanians "Palestinians" ect... Oh and you can be an athiest and still be a Jew

No need for the scare quotes about Palestinians. They're as real as the other groups listed.

 

[Jroc]

Obama sends army chief to Israel to convince it not to attack Iran

1/15/2012,

The Obama administration is sending the head of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey to Israel this Thursday to try to change what it sees as Israel’s increasing readiness to attack Iran.

Both Israel and the United States have stated they would not rule out a military strike on Tehran to prevent the Islamic Republic from reaching the capability of attacking Israel, or elsewhere, with a nuclear weapon. However, American officials are worried that Israel is closer to concluding that the “point of no return” is at hand, after which it may be too late to stop Iran.

With 15,000 soldiers, diplomats and contractors in Iraq, Iran’s neighbor, Washington is worried that an Israeli strike would place them in danger, The Wall Street Journal reported. Israel is concerned that Iranian nuclear capability would give it leverage to achieve its dream of dominating the Muslim world and “wiping Israel off the map” in the words of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Dempsey will meet his counterpart in Israel, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz, as well as Defense Minister Ehud Barak and possibly Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. President Barack Obama telephoned the Prime Minister last Thursday and expressed his “unshakeable” commitment to Israel’s security, but the White House declined to describe the content of the conversation.

The head of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, on his first official visit to Israel, will try to convince Israel that new sanctions on Iran and the deployment of thousands of U.S. soldiers in Kuwait demonstrate its intention to deter Iran. The United States also has sent a second aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf and underscored its vow to prevent Iran from holding the Western world hostage by closing the passage of oil tankers.

The nervousness in Washington is aggravated by its officials not really knowing what are the intentions of Israel. "It's hard to know what's bluster and what's not with the Israelis," a former U.S. official to the Journal

.

US Nervous, Sends Army General to Calm Israel - Defense/Security - News - Israel National News

 

[Jroc]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZZHSKqGtF8]Ari Shavit - Haaretz - If Obama reelected Israel will face crisis.wmv - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Polk]

Israel faces a crisis because it's current leadership wants to annex half the region and wipe out the people living there.

 

[Jroc]

Israel faces a crisis because it's current leadership wants to annex half the region and wipe out the people living there.

Yeah? "Israel wants" I'm glad you know what "Israel wants" Israel could have done it if "Israel wants" actually Israel has returned land many times larger then it for peace, and look what it has gotten them. "Israel wants" you're funny guy

 

[Jroc]

Obama’s Anti-Israel Sell-Out Continues

Ben Shapiro Feb 8th, 2012

Let’s say you’re Israel. An enemy dedicated to your destruction is developing the means to wipe you off the face of the earth, with the covert and overt help of world powers like Russia and China. It’s only a matter of months before that enemy achieves its goals – and when it does you will not be able to stop the mushroom cloud rising over your cities.

So you come up with a sophisticated military plan to strike your foe in an extraordinarily targeted fashion. And you ask for the help of your longtime ally – virtually your only ally – the United States. All you want is covert logistical support … and secrecy. Secrecy is of the utmost importance, since a full-scale aerial assault on your enemy is unfeasible.

Let’s say you’re Israel. What would you say if the United States promptly proceeded to broadcast your military plans to the rest of the world?

Two little words come to mind. And neither of them is “thanks.”

That’s precisely what happened this week, when Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced via the Washington Post that “there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June – before Iran enters what Israelis described as a ‘zone of immunity’ to commence building a nuclear bomb.” What was the point of spilling the beans? To scuttle the attack, of course. According to the Post, “President Obama and Panetta are said to have cautioned the Israelis that the United States opposes an attack, believing that it would derail an increasingly successful international economic sanctions program and other non-military efforts to stop Iran from crossing the threshold.”

This has become pattern for the Obama Administration. Back in June 2010, you’ll recall, the London Times reported that the Saudi Arabians had cut a deal with the Israelis to allow them to use Saudi airspace for a strike on Iran. Where did the Times learn this? According to the Jerusalem Post, “The report cited a US defense source as saying the Saudis have already done tests to ensure no jet is shot down in the event of an Israeli attack. The source added that the U.S. State Department is aware of the agreement.”

Well, isn’t that odd – two blown secrets, two references to the U.S. Defense Department.

Obama’s Anti-Israel Sell-Out Continues | FrontPage Magazine

 

[freedombecki]

Obama’s Anti-Israel Sell-Out Continues

Ben Shapiro Feb 8th, 2012

Let’s say you’re Israel. An enemy dedicated to your destruction is developing the means to wipe you off the face of the earth, with the covert and overt help of world powers like Russia and China. It’s only a matter of months before that enemy achieves its goals – and when it does you will not be able to stop the mushroom cloud rising over your cities.

So you come up with a sophisticated military plan to strike your foe in an extraordinarily targeted fashion. And you ask for the help of your longtime ally – virtually your only ally – the United States. All you want is covert logistical support … and secrecy. Secrecy is of the utmost importance, since a full-scale aerial assault on your enemy is unfeasible.

Let’s say you’re Israel. What would you say if the United States promptly proceeded to broadcast your military plans to the rest of the world?

Two little words come to mind. And neither of them is “thanks.”

That’s precisely what happened this week, when Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced via the Washington Post that “there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June – before Iran enters what Israelis described as a ‘zone of immunity’ to commence building a nuclear bomb.” What was the point of spilling the beans? To scuttle the attack, of course. According to the Post, “President Obama and Panetta are said to have cautioned the Israelis that the United States opposes an attack, believing that it would derail an increasingly successful international economic sanctions program and other non-military efforts to stop Iran from crossing the threshold.”

This has become pattern for the Obama Administration. Back in June 2010, you’ll recall, the London Times reported that the Saudi Arabians had cut a deal with the Israelis to allow them to use Saudi airspace for a strike on Iran. Where did the Times learn this? According to the Jerusalem Post, “The report cited a US defense source as saying the Saudis have already done tests to ensure no jet is shot down in the event of an Israeli attack. The source added that the U.S. State Department is aware of the agreement.”

Well, isn’t that odd – two blown secrets, two references to the U.S. Defense Department.

Obama’s Anti-Israel Sell-Out Continues | FrontPage Magazine

That thought crossed my mind, but then, I thought: there has to be a reason for this or it wouldn't have been said.

I cannot say, jroc, except that there has to be some very important reason Panetta said what he said. Nobody hopes better for Israel's safety than me, but there just has to be a reason those words were uttered. I couldn't begin to speculate, I just have a feeling.

 

[Jroc]

Obama’s Anti-Israel Sell-Out Continues

Ben Shapiro Feb 8th, 2012

Let’s say you’re Israel. An enemy dedicated to your destruction is developing the means to wipe you off the face of the earth, with the covert and overt help of world powers like Russia and China. It’s only a matter of months before that enemy achieves its goals – and when it does you will not be able to stop the mushroom cloud rising over your cities.

So you come up with a sophisticated military plan to strike your foe in an extraordinarily targeted fashion. And you ask for the help of your longtime ally – virtually your only ally – the United States. All you want is covert logistical support … and secrecy. Secrecy is of the utmost importance, since a full-scale aerial assault on your enemy is unfeasible.

Let’s say you’re Israel. What would you say if the United States promptly proceeded to broadcast your military plans to the rest of the world?

Two little words come to mind. And neither of them is “thanks.”

That’s precisely what happened this week, when Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced via the Washington Post that “there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June – before Iran enters what Israelis described as a ‘zone of immunity’ to commence building a nuclear bomb.” What was the point of spilling the beans? To scuttle the attack, of course. According to the Post, “President Obama and Panetta are said to have cautioned the Israelis that the United States opposes an attack, believing that it would derail an increasingly successful international economic sanctions program and other non-military efforts to stop Iran from crossing the threshold.”

This has become pattern for the Obama Administration. Back in June 2010, you’ll recall, the London Times reported that the Saudi Arabians had cut a deal with the Israelis to allow them to use Saudi airspace for a strike on Iran. Where did the Times learn this? According to the Jerusalem Post, “The report cited a US defense source as saying the Saudis have already done tests to ensure no jet is shot down in the event of an Israeli attack. The source added that the U.S. State Department is aware of the agreement.”

Well, isn’t that odd – two blown secrets, two references to the U.S. Defense Department.

Obama’s Anti-Israel Sell-Out Continues | FrontPage Magazine

That thought crossed my mind, but then, I thought: there has to be a reason for this or it wouldn't have been said.

I cannot say, jroc, except that there has to be some very important reason Panetta said what he said. Nobody hopes better for Israel's safety than me, but there just has to be a reason those words were uttered. I couldn't begin to speculate, I just have a feeling.

I’m sure there is a reason; it could only be one of two. Either Panetta did this in public to put pressure on Iran or to put pressure on Israel. But Panetta also went to Turkey and gave a speech about how Israel needs to "get back to the negotiating table" While saying nothing about Turkey's new found friendship with Hamas. We''ll know soon enough

 

[theliq]

"I'm all ears to hear what you wanted said at the speech that was not said."

Politics is the art of sayings with different meanings.

ROPEY,COME ON.....I know you have just come back from the Big I but America always supports Israel....just saying .....steve

 

[Sunni Man]

Israel is prepared to defend it's self down to the last American.

 

[Katzndogz]

Israel should bomb the middle east into oblivion and take all the oil. Of course obama opposes self defense by Israel, in his heart he's a muslim pretending to be a Christian for political expediency.

 

[Sunni Man]

Israel should bomb the middle east into oblivion and take all the oil. Of course obama opposes self defense by Israel, in his heart he's a muslim pretending to be a Christian for political expediency.

Sounds like a well thought out plan you propose.