🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

An Atheists View of Kim Davis' Incarceration For Her Faith

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,767
From

The Religious Persecution of Kim Davis - Christopher Cantwell

"The constitution of Kentucky, which 75% of Kentucky voters opted to amend in a referendum from 2004. In that amendment, same-sex marriage, or any “legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriagewas specifically outlawed. You might think that terrible, you might think it unjust, you might think it tyrannical, but that is the law in Kentucky. To throw someone into a Kentucky jail for upholding it, is nothing short of an act of war by the federal government against the state of Kentucky.

"Never believe a leftist who tells you they believe in democracy. The Kentucky constitution, that’s what democracy looks like. The ban on gay marriage approved by the overwhelming majority of Kentucky voters, that’s what democracy looks like. Subverting democracy and the constitutions of both Kentucky and the United States, that is lawlessness and aggression on a scale anarchism can barely even comprehend.

"Some say Kim Davis should just do her job, that her religious convictions do not afford her the right to break the law. But Kim Davis did her job, and the only lawbreakers here are the federal courts. She upheld the constitution of Kentucky despite the violent threats of a belligerent judiciary drunk with power. The majority in Obergefell seized powers not designated to it by any text of the constitution nor any precedent of prior court rulings. They simply decided that gay marriage was good, and thus they would violently oppress anyone who disagreed with them.

"They did so knowing it would be met with a great deal of resistance, not only from religious people, but from anyone with any regard for the constitution of the United States. So the moment that resistance presented itself, the judiciary took the most extreme measure available to it to crush that dissent, and strike fear into all who might follow her lead. Kim Davis is being held in jail, not until some sentence expires, but until she renounces her deity and conforms to the will of the court."

But the Gheys are accustomed to bending over to serve pure power, so in their view why wouldn't anyone else find life on their knees something that they can live with?

'Belief in gawd or principle? Pshaw! That is just rhetoric for losers,' says the new Ghey World we live in.
 
^^^ Buncha malarkey.

A majority cannot make an unconstitutional act or law stand.
 
"Never believe a leftist who tells you they believe in democracy.

What a way to go through life. Such programming is deep rooted and allows oneself to never think about it. His marching orders have been given and must be followed just like a good independent thinker lol
 
From

The Religious Persecution of Kim Davis - Christopher Cantwell

"The constitution of Kentucky, which 75% of Kentucky voters opted to amend in a referendum from 2004. In that amendment, same-sex marriage, or any “legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriagewas specifically outlawed. You might think that terrible, you might think it unjust, you might think it tyrannical, but that is the law in Kentucky. To throw someone into a Kentucky jail for upholding it, is nothing short of an act of war by the federal government against the state of Kentucky..

LOL.....not the first time the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws because they were unconstitutional. That law is null and void in Kentucky.

People get thrown in jail for contempt of court- even Christians.
 
^^^ Buncha malarkey.

A majority cannot make an unconstitutional act or law stand.
lol, and Starkey reminds us all what a complete moron he is.

The vote in Kentucky was BEFORE the SCOTUs ruling genius, and because I know you wont see the relevance to that, since you are a certified idiot, the SCOTUS reversed the state of Kentucky by judicial fiat, not as you described.


roflmao
 
LOL.....not the first time the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws because they were unconstitutional. That law is null and void in Kentucky.
Wow, so you must be an expert.


Which part of the Constitution, written by mean who were 100% against fag marriage in every piece of it, which part of that Constitution allows butt fuckers to mock marriage with sham weddings?
 
LOL.....not the first time the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws because they were unconstitutional. That law is null and void in Kentucky.
Wow, so you must be an expert.


Which part of the Constitution, written by mean who were 100% against fag marriage in every piece of it, which part of that Constitution allows butt fuckers to mock marriage with sham weddings?

Guess you missed the whole excitement about the Supreme Court decision- and how state marriage laws that prohibit same gender marriages are unconstitutional.

Google is your friend- type in "Supreme Court" gay marriage decision 2015- and you can read in great detail exactly why the bans are unconstitutional.
 
"Never believe a leftist who tells you they believe in democracy.

What a way to go through life. Such programming is deep rooted and allows oneself to never think about it. His marching orders have been given and must be followed just like a good independent thinker lol

It is the Truth. I have not read a leftist in the past twenty years who had a bad thing to say about Castro or Mao or Stalin.

The situation is so pathetic that Hollyweird has to keep digging up old Nazi shit to play bad guys. ITs getting so old now they have to do serious flashbacks to pull it off. But what do they do after all living survivors of WW2 die and they cant even do a flashback fearscape of Nazidom? roflmao

And of course the only decent movie that did a critical take of Stalin's Russia got a complete negative review from the leftists today that try to spin all art to support their megalomaniac view of history and themselves.

lolololololol

The sad world of the libtard dystopian illusion is crashing to the ground and their resources are all drying up, as they have separated themselves from the values of the people they want to rule.
 
LOL.....not the first time the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws because they were unconstitutional. That law is null and void in Kentucky.
Wow, so you must be an expert.


Which part of the Constitution, written by mean who were 100% against fag marriage in every piece of it, which part of that Constitution allows butt fuckers to mock marriage with sham weddings?

Guess you missed the whole excitement about the Supreme Court decision- and how state marriage laws that prohibit same gender marriages are unconstitutional.

Google is your friend- type in "Supreme Court" gay marriage decision 2015- and you can read in great detail exactly why the bans are unconstitutional.
Guess you don't want to answer my question. Thanks for playing, posteur.
 
LOL.....not the first time the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws because they were unconstitutional. That law is null and void in Kentucky.
Wow, so you must be an expert.


Which part of the Constitution, written by mean who were 100% against fag marriage in every piece of it, which part of that Constitution allows butt fuckers to mock marriage with sham weddings?

Guess you missed the whole excitement about the Supreme Court decision- and how state marriage laws that prohibit same gender marriages are unconstitutional.

Google is your friend- type in "Supreme Court" gay marriage decision 2015- and you can read in great detail exactly why the bans are unconstitutional.
Guess you don't want to answer my question. Thanks for playing, posteur.

Guess you don't want anything more than a soundbite.

Is there some particular reason you don't want to know the actual constitutional grounds under which these laws are unconsitutional?
 
LOL...Christopher Cantwell, according to Wikipedia, got his GED in prison, and was kicked out of a Libertarian group for advocating violence.

JimBob can sure pick his kooks!
 
^^^ Buncha malarkey.

A majority cannot make an unconstitutional act or law stand.
lol, and Starkey reminds us all what a complete moron he is.

The vote in Kentucky was BEFORE the SCOTUs ruling genius, and because I know you wont see the relevance to that, since you are a certified idiot, the SCOTUS reversed the state of Kentucky by judicial fiat, not as you described.roflmao
You are stupid. It was found unlawful by SCOTUS, just like Brown v. Board.

The point is the a democratic majority cannot override the guarantees inherit in the Constitution.
 
I am so grateful know the few remaining like JimBowie are growing older and more infirm and will surely pass from this world.
 
LOL.....not the first time the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws because they were unconstitutional. That law is null and void in Kentucky.
Wow, so you must be an expert.


Which part of the Constitution, written by mean who were 100% against fag marriage in every piece of it, which part of that Constitution allows butt fuckers to mock marriage with sham weddings?

Guess you missed the whole excitement about the Supreme Court decision- and how state marriage laws that prohibit same gender marriages are unconstitutional.

Google is your friend- type in "Supreme Court" gay marriage decision 2015- and you can read in great detail exactly why the bans are unconstitutional.
Guess you don't want to answer my question. Thanks for playing, posteur.

Guess you don't want anything more than a soundbite.

Is there some particular reason you don't want to know the actual constitutional grounds under which these laws are unconsitutional?
Yes, those grounds conflict with errant conservative dogma.
 
"Never believe a leftist who tells you they believe in democracy.

What a way to go through life. Such programming is deep rooted and allows oneself to never think about it. His marching orders have been given and must be followed just like a good independent thinker lol

It is the Truth. I have not read a leftist in the past twenty years who had a bad thing to say about Castro or Mao or Stalin.
.

Well let me put an end to that- I guess it is that problem you have with not reading much.

Castro is a repressive dictator, who abused his people. Not as bad as Mao or Stalin- but bad.

Mao was a zealot- a zealot who killed millions of his own people and destroyed much of Chinese culture, while imposing a horrible political and economic system on the Chinese people.

Stalin- worst of all in my opinion- a few steps away from Hitler- Stalin murdered millions of his own people, engaged in wholesale forced migrations of ethnic groups he considered unreliable.

If you havent' read a single 'leftist' say anything bad about Castro, Stalin or Mao in the last 20 years, then you must really work to stay ignorant- but I am glad to end such ignorance for you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top