An Existential Danger To America

"Unforgivable Sin Now Thought To Be Whiteness
April 17th, 2019
article-4042-1.jpg


U.S.—Scholars have long debated what the unforgivable sin is. Now one group of Bible experts says they've figured it out: it's whiteness.

The scholars revealed their updated translation of Jesus's words in Mark 3:

"Truly I tell you, people can be forgiven all their sins, but anyone who's white will never be forgiven. This is the eternal sin."

"People have proposed that when Jesus talked about the one unforgivable sin He was talking about denying Him repeatedly," Dr. Varucci Martinez said, addressing the coalition of scholars gathered to codify the new proposal. "But it's obvious now that it's being unrepentantly white. That's clearly the only thing God won't forgive you for: being a white person and not trying to do better and atone for it throughout your life."

Dr. Martinez then led the assembled scholars in a chant of "Do better! Do better!" before participating in a symbolic but also very literal hanging of a white man onstage.

Several Christian leaders suggested that white people either get a skin transplant, constantly moan about being white, or even just kill themselves if they want to repent.

"It seems like this still won't get you off the hook, since your whiteness is unforgivable, but maybe if God sees how much you hate yourself He'll have some leniency," they said.
Unforgivable Sin Now Thought To Be Whiteness
 
"Unforgivable Sin Now Thought To Be Whiteness
April 17th, 2019
article-4042-1.jpg


U.S.—Scholars have long debated what the unforgivable sin is. Now one group of Bible experts says they've figured it out: it's whiteness.

The scholars revealed their updated translation of Jesus's words in Mark 3:

"Truly I tell you, people can be forgiven all their sins, but anyone who's white will never be forgiven. This is the eternal sin."

"People have proposed that when Jesus talked about the one unforgivable sin He was talking about denying Him repeatedly," Dr. Varucci Martinez said, addressing the coalition of scholars gathered to codify the new proposal. "But it's obvious now that it's being unrepentantly white. That's clearly the only thing God won't forgive you for: being a white person and not trying to do better and atone for it throughout your life."

Dr. Martinez then led the assembled scholars in a chant of "Do better! Do better!" before participating in a symbolic but also very literal hanging of a white man onstage.

Several Christian leaders suggested that white people either get a skin transplant, constantly moan about being white, or even just kill themselves if they want to repent.

"It seems like this still won't get you off the hook, since your whiteness is unforgivable, but maybe if God sees how much you hate yourself He'll have some leniency," they said.
Unforgivable Sin Now Thought To Be Whiteness

Ummm...you know the Babylon Bee is a satirical website, right?

'The Babylon Bee is a satirical evangelical Christian website. The site publishes satirical stories focusing on well- known pastors, celebrities, and politicians. It was created by Adam Ford[1][2][3] and was launched on March 1, 2016.[4] In 2018, Ford sold the website to Seth Dillon. As part of the deal, Kyle Mann, who had been head writer since September 2016, became editor in chief.[5]

The Babylon Bee copies the style of The Onion.'

The Babylon Bee - Wikipedia



Lighten up, lady.
 
Give me a break.
This is the second thread about this...and this is from psycho place, Info Wars.
One nobody librarian makes a post on her blog and you Trumpbots assume the sky is falling.
Grow spines, for Christ sake.
In fact, quite the opposite. Every time Leftist racism and hypocrisy is the topic of a thread, there you are acting all butthurt. This time you even posted a pic of your prescription!
 
If the dems want to put walls up around their urban plantations to keep their hold on the citizenry there they can, but if they try to push their fucked-up policies on the suburban and rural folks, they have another thought coming. Maybe a few states like NY and CA would also follow their dictums, but there would also be a major outflow of voters to free states. I'm hoping that 2020 will be a refutation of the socialist, big government, anti-2nd Amendment, Green New Deal, Open Border, free healthcare, free college, democrats. We've seen this movie before, in 1972...Nixon v. McGovern....
1972_large.png

4 years later the map looked a little different because of who the repubs choice to be president (Nixon) and 4 years later Carter won against Ford
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok


I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok


I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.

Yep. An amalgam of all the Fauxrageous false talking points put together like that really shows the dangers of and the main reason why Fox is Bad News for America.
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok


I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.

Yep. An amalgam of all the Fauxrageous false talking points put together like that really shows the dangers of and the main reason why Fox is Bad News for America.



Seems you are unable to produce any such 'false' talking points.


That must mean you're lying again, huh?
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok


I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.

Yep. An amalgam of all the Fauxrageous false talking points put together like that really shows the dangers of and the main reason why Fox is Bad News for America.



Seems you are unable to produce any such 'false' talking points.


That must mean you're lying again, huh?

Hahaha.

Turn off Faux.

It's Bad News for America
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok


I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.

Yep. An amalgam of all the Fauxrageous false talking points put together like that really shows the dangers of and the main reason why Fox is Bad News for America.



Seems you are unable to produce any such 'false' talking points.


That must mean you're lying again, huh?

Hahaha.

Turn off Faux.

It's Bad News for America



So.....you admit you've been lying again?


Excellent.
 
Everywhere in the modern world but GOP dupe America, socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net. Everything you idiot GOP Dupes know is garbage propaganda. Less than 1% of abortions are late-term and you need two doctors and the mother to agree that it will save the mother's life and the baby is not viable. Not wanting to spend billions on a useless un American wall does that mean you are for open borders duh. Wanting Justice and opportunity for the non Rich is not anti White racism, idiot.


"...socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net."

No it doesn't.
I means what it always has....including the slaughter and imprisonment of those who don't fall in line.



Don't worry, you fool......I can help:


so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
    synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
    • policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
      synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More

    • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Google.


Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.
 
Everywhere in the modern world but GOP dupe America, socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net. Everything you idiot GOP Dupes know is garbage propaganda. Less than 1% of abortions are late-term and you need two doctors and the mother to agree that it will save the mother's life and the baby is not viable. Not wanting to spend billions on a useless un American wall does that mean you are for open borders duh. Wanting Justice and opportunity for the non Rich is not anti White racism, idiot.


"...socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net."

No it doesn't.
I means what it always has....including the slaughter and imprisonment of those who don't fall in line.



Don't worry, you fool......I can help:


so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
    synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
    • policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
      synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More

    • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Google.


Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.
Bologna, communism has only been put in by violent revolution. Socialism today is always democratic fair capitalism with a good safety net... Excepting Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe America. "We are all socialists now!--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....
 
The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok


I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.

Yep. An amalgam of all the Fauxrageous false talking points put together like that really shows the dangers of and the main reason why Fox is Bad News for America.



Seems you are unable to produce any such 'false' talking points.


That must mean you're lying again, huh?

Hahaha.

Turn off Faux.

It's Bad News for America



So.....you admit you've been lying again?


Excellent.

R U listening to those voices again?
 
Everywhere in the modern world but GOP dupe America, socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net. Everything you idiot GOP Dupes know is garbage propaganda. Less than 1% of abortions are late-term and you need two doctors and the mother to agree that it will save the mother's life and the baby is not viable. Not wanting to spend billions on a useless un American wall does that mean you are for open borders duh. Wanting Justice and opportunity for the non Rich is not anti White racism, idiot.


"...socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net."

No it doesn't.
I means what it always has....including the slaughter and imprisonment of those who don't fall in line.



Don't worry, you fool......I can help:


so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
    synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
    • policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
      synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More

    • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Google.


Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.


Bet you've read The Gulag Archipelago by Russian writer and historian Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


Thank you, as always for your post and insight. That being said, let us time travel in spirit back to the French Revolution and examine for a moment the atheist mob mentality born among the French masses not by radio or satellite or fiber optic internet waves, but by books; tens of thousands of radical Leftist French philosopher written books which after being distributed to all French Revolution social classes, convinced a large number of them that slaughtering their fellow countrymen in the name of godlessness was the right thing to do. During that horrible time of evil, soldiers and civilians alike bayoneted children (I'm censoring), pregnant women, tied married couples to logs they then threw in rivers. In other words, when the radical, atheist Left raised a large enough mob in 18th century France, what did they do with said mob? They used it to slaughter hundreds of thousands of their fellow French citizens, that's what.

Now, back to our present day and we can clearly see the undertones of French Revolution radical Leftist cultism ravaging our nation with such winning platforms as child murder and child mutilation, atheism, communism, anti-fact, overt lying to the masses and so much more. The only question perhaps then becomes: how much longer will WE THE PEOPLE tolerate the dictatorship of liberal judges whose rulings have implemented so much of the French Revolution-like radical Leftist insanity, before we go to war to smack them down?
 
Everywhere in the modern world but GOP dupe America, socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net. Everything you idiot GOP Dupes know is garbage propaganda. Less than 1% of abortions are late-term and you need two doctors and the mother to agree that it will save the mother's life and the baby is not viable. Not wanting to spend billions on a useless un American wall does that mean you are for open borders duh. Wanting Justice and opportunity for the non Rich is not anti White racism, idiot.


"...socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net."

No it doesn't.
I means what it always has....including the slaughter and imprisonment of those who don't fall in line.



Don't worry, you fool......I can help:


so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
    synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
    • policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
      synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More

    • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Google.


Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.
Bologna, communism has only been put in by violent revolution. Socialism today is always democratic fair capitalism with a good safety net... Excepting Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe America. "We are all socialists now!--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....



Both are theft.


Dunces like you don't care if earners have the fruits of their labor stolen, as you are one of the vagrants standing there with your hand out.
 
I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.

Yep. An amalgam of all the Fauxrageous false talking points put together like that really shows the dangers of and the main reason why Fox is Bad News for America.



Seems you are unable to produce any such 'false' talking points.


That must mean you're lying again, huh?

Hahaha.

Turn off Faux.

It's Bad News for America



So.....you admit you've been lying again?


Excellent.

R U listening to those voices again?



You can attempt to change the subject....I won't allow it.

You lied....I caught you.....now you're tap dancing.
 
Everywhere in the modern world but GOP dupe America, socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net. Everything you idiot GOP Dupes know is garbage propaganda. Less than 1% of abortions are late-term and you need two doctors and the mother to agree that it will save the mother's life and the baby is not viable. Not wanting to spend billions on a useless un American wall does that mean you are for open borders duh. Wanting Justice and opportunity for the non Rich is not anti White racism, idiot.


"...socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net."

No it doesn't.
I means what it always has....including the slaughter and imprisonment of those who don't fall in line.



Don't worry, you fool......I can help:


so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
    synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
    • policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
      synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More

    • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Google.


Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.
Is that why taxpayer dough is used to bail out the to big to fail capitalist kingdoms?
 
Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

  1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
  2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections




Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.


Thank you, as always for your post and insight. That being said, let us time travel in spirit back to the French Revolution and examine for a moment the atheist mob mentality born among the French masses not by radio or satellite or fiber optic internet waves, but by books; tens of thousands of radical Leftist French philosopher written books which after being distributed to all French Revolution social classes, convinced a large number of them that slaughtering their fellow countrymen in the name of godlessness was the right thing to do. During that horrible time of evil, soldiers and civilians alike bayoneted children (I'm censoring), pregnant women, tied married couples to logs they then threw in rivers. In other words, when the radical, atheist Left raised a large enough mob in 18th century France, what did they do with said mob? They used it to slaughter hundreds of thousands of their fellow French citizens, that's what.

Now, back to our present day and we can clearly see the undertones of French Revolution radical Leftist cultism ravaging our nation with such winning platforms as child murder and child mutilation, atheism, communism, anti-fact, overt lying to the masses and so much more. The only question perhaps then becomes: how much longer will WE THE PEOPLE tolerate the dictatorship of liberal judges whose rulings have implemented so much of the French Revolution-like radical Leftist insanity, before we go to war to smack them down?


You always say the nicest things. Much thanks.


Coincidentally, at this moment I'm working on a thread that refers to exactly that, the French Revolution.

This is one part....


1.The battle cry of the Left…”separation of church and state.” Why? Truth is, America was founded based on the Judeo-Christian faith, the Bible being the most quoted source by our Founders. And those Founders were religious folks who saw America as the extension of the Jews escaping Egypt.

The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2010/02/new_column_libe_4.html
They were believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known by Leftists today, “an extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”
 

Forum List

Back
Top