Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
non sequiturWhy would warm air move towards the equator? ... this isn't a casual mistake, this shows incompetence at even basic physics ... the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics requires warm air to be moved to the poles ... thus tropical cyclones are created ... along the other convergence zone forms cold-core cyclones that move cold air towards the equator ...
Yes ... both Billy and I understand this typhoon has already transitioned into a extra-tropical storm ... why do you think we're using upper level charts? ... dumbass ...
Meteorology 201 ... just like Doctor Liar, you believe commercial media without question ... without understanding ... and apparently without the rainfall we've been seeing here ... entire hundredths of inches ... crazy crazy weather today ...
LOLIncorrect. My claim is that they have mistakenly attributed CO2 as the cause of the recent warming trend.
"One simple statement of the law is that heat always moves "downhill", that is, from hotter objects to colder objects, unless energy is supplied to reverse the direction of heat flow. Another definition is: "Not all heat energy can be converted into work in a cyclic process."" --- Wikipedia
"It is impossible for any cyclical machine to produce no other effect than to convey heat continuously from one body to another at a higher temperature" -- Clausius
Nothing about a closed system ... do you a citation? ...
It's cold in your freezer because it's hot at the compressor ... look around your unit, there's a round thing that has warning stickers on it ... it WILL burn your fingers ...
That's because the fridge is NOT a closed system.
That is precisely how you can have a SPONTANEOUS REACTION that goes even though the entropy term is POSITIVE.
"One simple statement of the law is that heat always moves "downhill", that is, from hotter objects to colder objects, unless energy is supplied to reverse the direction of heat flow. Another definition is: "Not all heat energy can be converted into work in a cyclic process."" --- Wikipedia
Nothing about a closed system ... do you a citation? ...
chem.libretexts.org
You have no examples of a closed system? ... I understand you used a piss-poor example here ... put two blocks of iron with different temperatures together, see how they change temperature until they are equal? ... do you think this doesn't happen in an open environment? ...
Actually I don't. Sun, albedo and earth's tendency to cool naturally. Been going on for 50 million years. You probably think these temperatures are normal. They're not. For much of the past 3 million years the earth has been much much colder.LOL
That's about the same claim you have ALWAYS made, and you have not restricted to just "CO2."
You just say it's all natural cycles 'to be expected in the interglacial period.'
You BORING LIAR/ONE-LINE TROLL.
I Count 500+ ding-troll posts using that 'interglacial normal' .. routine.
`
That is an oversimplification. I thought you were a scientist.
Technically speaking it is an isolated system.
"This is indeed a positive quantity. In general, we can say for an isolated system:
dS≥0"
20.4: The Second Law of Thermodynamics
An isolated system is a little more than just adiabatic. In the latter heat cannot get in or out. In an isolated system nothing gets in or out, neither heat nor mass nor even any radiation, such as …
You just said it Again, even more Stooopidly/worse/widely using a "50 million year" Range/average/'normal interglacialS.'Actually I don't. Sun, albedo and earth's tendency to cool naturally. Been going on for 50 million years. You probably think these temperatures are normal. They're not. For much of the past 3 million years the earth has been much much colder.
Did you read Section 20.4.2 in your link? ... that explains my position with mathematical certainty, that's what all those strange squirrelly symbols mean ... it even gives the same Clausius quote as in Halliday/Resnick ...
Thank you ... these Law of Thermodynamics apply in both open and the "as good as useless" case of a closed system ... Jeez that's one hell of a link there buck-o ... talk about reaming people who only work with closed systems ... "as good as useless" ... ROFL ...
I am not a scientist ... I'm an uneducated construction laborer ... I've only claimed to have taken a class in meteorology ... which you have not ... I suspect you've not taken any physics classes either ...
I wish you could be honest with me ... something's wrong, maybe it's just the internet ... are you this bad at lying in Real Life? ...
Did you read Section 20.4.2 in your link? ... that explains my position with mathematical certainty, that's what all those strange squirrelly symbols mean ... it even gives the same Clausius quote as in Halliday/Resnick ...
So in your world you cannot make ice in a refrigerator.
Remember, the second law deals in ENTROPY. As such in your world if the Second Law applies to all systems, open, closed, isolated, then in your world entropy can NEVER BE a positive term.
We're in the middle of an ice age. The dominant feature is bipolar glaciation.You just said it Again, even more Stooopidly/worse/widely using a "50 million year" Range/average/'normal interglacialS.'
which does NOT preclude AGW in any way.
Nor refute all the Evidence for it, including the last/fast 150 yr SPIKE.
Citing 50 million years of temp for any number of different reasons doesn't make the Spike normal.
You remain an illogical obfuscating TROLL.
`
Not without being plugged into the wall
The 2nd Law also deals with equilibrium ... and how the system and the environment work towards equilibrium ...
Remember, the second law deals in ENTROPY.
How are you defining temperature here? ... I'm curious if you're mixing up the microscopic statements with the macroscopic statements ... the difference being how we define temperature ...
Maybe you didn't know we had two different definitions of temperature ... one for Classical Physics and one for Quantum Mechanics ...
... hateful ...
... hateful ...
... hateful ...
We need to burn tires ...
