You're joking, right?The Second Law is ONLY applicable to closed systems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're joking, right?The Second Law is ONLY applicable to closed systems.
The atmosphere is open to incoming energy and outgoing energy, hence it is a perfect description of a NON-CLOSED, NON-ISOLATED system to which the Second Law is of limited use.
What is your problem?There's the backtrack ... oh, now the 2nd Law is of limited use ...
Fucking liar ...
Thermodynamic equilibrium - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Mamade Global Climate Warming Change!!A massive polar low is wreaking destruction on Alaska... And it's headed to the US...
![]()
Alaska in for Nightmare of a Storm, Most Ferocious in a Decade
'All this warm air that’s been brought north by this ex-typhoon is basically inducing a chain reaction in the jet stream.'www.westernjournal.com
Wind patterns show this will descend on Canada and the Western US in the coming days.
What is your problem?
Quick ... change the subject ... we were discussing your lying tongue ... and your claim to have a PhD in geology, when you can't even discuss basic physics without showing your ignorance ...
Yes ... equilibrium and the 2nd Law go hand-in-hand ... can't have one without the other ... Doctor Liar ... the shame of it is that you're better than this ... or could be if you wanted ...
Mamade Global Climate Warming Change!!
DENIER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Maybe, maybe not. Actual scientists don't take single events and ascribe AGW to them as that is not possible.
There's something scientists do that YOU don't understand. It's called "accept noise in the data". It means sometimes really big storms happen by random chance and not related to AGW. All data is noisy. You wouldn't understand what a "scatterplot" is so I'll just leave it at that.
Do try to learn what the experts ACTUALLY think, not just your junior high school science class assumptions.
DENIER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you don't understand data you don't understand any of these topics.
Did you know that:
- Until 1860 CO2 lagged temperature on both increase and decrease!
- Chinese CO2 is different. American CO2 is melting the ice caps, causing floods and fires (don't ask), causes the oceans to rise and started the 6th Mass Extinction (How Dare You! You stole Greta's childhood). Chinese CO2, because it enters the air on a per capita basis (again, don't ask, this is how climate science is done) is not the same threat as American CO2. Chinese industries must be left to grow and thrive and emit more CO2 than 2 USAs
- CO2 is terrified of a lab. Whenever called upon to show the temperature increase by raising CO2 from 280 to 400PPM, CO2 is MIA. This applies to both Chinese and American CO2. It just happens, it's killing all human life but has a Labaphobia.
- This thing all things devours:
Birds, beasts, trees, flowers;
Gnaws iron, bites steel;
Grinds hard stones to meal;
Slays king, ruins town,
And beats high mountain down. Can you guess the answer?
If you don't understand data you don't understand any of these topics.
Have you ever opened a can of soda? Surely you must know that temperature increases can lead to EXSOLUTION of a gas from solution.
Wow, you didn't even have a basic intro science class did you?
You are a moron.
And you have actually ever been in a science lab? Yeah I didn't think so. Big talker from the cheap seats.
Your ignorance?
So how does an additional 120ppm of atmospheric CO2 heat the ocean 700m deep when it can't even raise temperature in a lab setting?
Do you think the earth has an iron nickel core? How do you know this? You REALIZE that NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN TO THE CORE OF THE EARTH. And to my knowledge no one has ever made a full planet complete with an Fe-Ni core in the lab.
Do you think the police have to kill someone in order to understand a murder scene?
You know next to nothing about science but you know sometimes science is done in a "lab" even though you don't know a thing about any of that.
Quick ... change the subject ... we were discussing your lying tongue ... and your claim to have a PhD in geology, when you can't even discuss basic physics without showing your ignorance ...
Yes ... equilibrium and the 2nd Law go hand-in-hand ... can't have one without the other ... Doctor Liar ... the shame of it is that you're better than this ... or could be if you wanted ...
why don't you go make it rain in California then?Maybe, maybe not. Actual scientists don't take single events and ascribe AGW to them as that is not possible.
There's something scientists do that YOU don't understand. It's called "accept noise in the data". It means sometimes really big storms happen by random chance and not related to AGW. All data is noisy. You wouldn't understand what a "scatterplot" is so I'll just leave it at that.
Do try to learn what the experts ACTUALLY think, not just your junior high school science class assumptions.
well it's obvious he thinks he can make it rain at will. wow.Just ask a simple geology question that you can't quickly Google and you see that this clod is a fraud.
well it's obvious he thinks he can make it rain at will. wow.