Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you saying that football players are recipients of AA?Yeah bullshit.....ever hear those black football players speak?
Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women.
Re: "Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women"
That's possible - Care to back that up ? Given your History of talking out your ass I doubt you can - but hey anythings possible.
The link was clear enough for those who are prone to objectivuty. For those who just won't accept Blacks as equals there is always something to pick at. If the link was not good enough for you, there are hundreds more on the same topic saying the same thing in different words.Geezz. I wasn't talking about your OPost. I was talking about the sketchy back up material that you linked to.
I'm not sure green carders are the immigrants mentioned in the article.That's BS about blacks at the pinnacle of academic achievement not being hired. In terms of those IMMIGRANT (student VISA) kids, this could be true. Because it applies to ALL FOREIGN students who must get some kind of Green Card to remain and WORK in the US.
I did notice a reference to the American born progeny of African immigrants who wouldn't need a green card since they are citizens. Yet, the inference was that they too, despite superior academic achievements, were among the underemployed.
I'm a bit chagrined by your reference to bright Nigerian immigrants as the "cream of the crop" in their country as if to devalue their achievments here.That's sort of a veiled put down. You seem to have a mental block that won't allow you to see them as the cream of the crop in the diverse USA. Too bad...the facts are public...And the diff between your foreign Black students and American Black kids is that ALL of the "immigrant" students were ALREADY the "cream of the crop" in their country and I'll bet MOST come from the top 1% of the economic stratas of their home country as well.
Before you can conclude that, you have to show some reasonable proof that the immigrants referenced in the article are mostly on visas. The word immigrant can also be applied to those who have attained citizenship.NO COMPARISON at ALL between students on Visas and getting educational parity HERE at home for Black kids.
You claim to have read the links I provided, yet you missed some of the most important data indicating that Blacks and hispanics are graduating from tech scools at twice the rate they are being hired.You don't magically get INFUSED with goals and inspiration BY a College. If you choose a bad major -- that's ON YOU --- not a requirement of White Racists that you be a Sports Comme
How about a Physicist or a Plastic Surgeon or a Chemical Engineer or an Aerospace designer
You are falling behind the times..join the NAACP or something...that might be of some value in helping you to understand. some of your darker fellow Americans.
If a black uses affirmative action to get something, they aren't equal. If they were, they wouldn't have to use it.
The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
The link was clear enough for those who are prone to objectivuty. For those who just won't accept Blacks as equals there is always something to pick at. If the link was not good enough for you, there are hundreds more on the same topic saying the same thing in different words.Geezz. I wasn't talking about your OPost. I was talking about the sketchy back up material that you linked to.
I'm not sure green carders are the immigrants mentioned in the article.That's BS about blacks at the pinnacle of academic achievement not being hired. In terms of those IMMIGRANT (student VISA) kids, this could be true. Because it applies to ALL FOREIGN students who must get some kind of Green Card to remain and WORK in the US.
I did notice a reference to the American born progeny of African immigrants who wouldn't need a green card since they are citizens. Yet, the inference was that they too, despite superior academic achievements, were among the underemployed.
I'm a bit chagrined by your reference to bright Nigerian immigrants as the "cream of the crop" in their country as if to devalue their achievments here.That's sort of a veiled put down. You seem to have a mental block that won't allow you to see them as the cream of the crop in the diverse USA. Too bad...the facts are public...And the diff between your foreign Black students and American Black kids is that ALL of the "immigrant" students were ALREADY the "cream of the crop" in their country and I'll bet MOST come from the top 1% of the economic stratas of their home country as well.
Before you can conclude that, you have to show some reasonable proof that the immigrants referenced in the article are mostly on visas. The word immigrant can also be applied to those who have attained citizenship.NO COMPARISON at ALL between students on Visas and getting educational parity HERE at home for Black kids.
You claim to have read the links I provided, yet you missed some of the most important data indicating that Blacks and hispanics are graduating from tech scools at twice the rate they are being hired.You don't magically get INFUSED with goals and inspiration BY a College. If you choose a bad major -- that's ON YOU --- not a requirement of White Racists that you be a Sports Comme
How about a Physicist or a Plastic Surgeon or a Chemical Engineer or an Aerospace designer
You are falling behind the times..join the NAACP or something...that might be of some value in helping you to understand. some of your darker fellow Americans.
If a black uses affirmative action to get something, they aren't equal. If they were, they wouldn't have to use it.
The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
See. I ALMOST agree with you. Should NOT be a race qualifier. It should be an "opportunity" qualifier. But here's the deal. It's the best that brain-dead partisan Govt can do.. The Fed Govt is NOT suited to picking winners and losers. And when they try to fix things -- they always take the EASIEST most political expedient way to claim credit.
In general -- MOST peoples's expectations for Fed Govt to solve ANYTHING is highly over-rated. And it usually results in sub-optimum solutions with MASSIVE "unintended side effects" because MOST of Fed "leadership" are moronic power hungry idealogues.. That's a true story. Not just hyperbole..
The link was clear enough for those who are prone to objectivuty. For those who just won't accept Blacks as equals there is always something to pick at. If the link was not good enough for you, there are hundreds more on the same topic saying the same thing in different words.
I'm not sure green carders are the immigrants mentioned in the article.
I did notice a reference to the American born progeny of African immigrants who wouldn't need a green card since they are citizens. Yet, the inference was that they too, despite superior academic achievements, were among the underemployed.
I'm a bit chagrined by your reference to bright Nigerian immigrants as the "cream of the crop" in their country as if to devalue their achievments here.That's sort of a veiled put down. You seem to have a mental block that won't allow you to see them as the cream of the crop in the diverse USA. Too bad...the facts are public...
Before you can conclude that, you have to show some reasonable proof that the immigrants referenced in the article are mostly on visas. The word immigrant can also be applied to those who have attained citizenship.
You claim to have read the links I provided, yet you missed some of the most important data indicating that Blacks and hispanics are graduating from tech scools at twice the rate they are being hired.
You are falling behind the times..join the NAACP or something...that might be of some value in helping you to understand. some of your darker fellow Americans.
If a black uses affirmative action to get something, they aren't equal. If they were, they wouldn't have to use it.
The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
See. I ALMOST agree with you. Should NOT be a race qualifier. It should be an "opportunity" qualifier. But here's the deal. It's the best that brain-dead partisan Govt can do.. The Fed Govt is NOT suited to picking winners and losers. And when they try to fix things -- they always take the EASIEST most political expedient way to claim credit.
In general -- MOST peoples's expectations for Fed Govt to solve ANYTHING is highly over-rated. And it usually results in sub-optimum solutions with MASSIVE "unintended side effects" because MOST of Fed "leadership" are moronic power hungry idealogues.. That's a true story. Not just hyperbole..
What do you mean "opportunity qualifier"?
Affirmative action might have initially been about race but when White women stood up and said "what about us" race was no longer a factor. Any underrepresented minority group was then eligible, even the eskimo living on an ice floe....provided he/she could qualify.If a black uses affirmative action to get something, they aren't equal. If they were, they wouldn't have to use it.
The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
See. I ALMOST agree with you. Should NOT be a race qualifier. It should be an "opportunity" qualifier. But here's the deal. It's the best that brain-dead partisan Govt can do.. The Fed Govt is NOT suited to picking winners and losers. And when they try to fix things -- they always take the EASIEST most political expedient way to claim credit.
In general -- MOST peoples's expectations for Fed Govt to solve ANYTHING is highly over-rated. And it usually results in sub-optimum solutions with MASSIVE "unintended side effects" because MOST of Fed "leadership" are moronic power hungry idealogues.. That's a true story. Not just hyperbole..
What do you mean "opportunity qualifier"?
Instead of race being the "alternative credit", it should be a leg up credit for overcoming "lack of opportunity". That pretty much covers educational inequality, economic inequality, family stability inequalities WITHOUT MAKING IT ABOUT ONLY race. That way the Inuit kid living out on a glacier -- gets the SAME "affirmative action"... IF -- they've showed ability to bust thru those handicaps and BE a potential College applicant.
I can back her up. Before AA was defanged white women benefitted in larger numbers than any other group.Are you saying that football players are recipients of AA?Yeah bullshit.....ever hear those black football players speak?
Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women.
Re: "Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women"
That's possible - Care to back that up ? Given your History of talking out your ass I doubt you can - but hey anythings possible.
That has been common knowledge for years.
I can back her up. Before AA was defanged white women benefitted in larger numbers than any other group.Are you saying that football players are recipients of AA?Yeah bullshit.....ever hear those black football players speak?
Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women.
Re: "Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women"
That's possible - Care to back that up ? Given your History of talking out your ass I doubt you can - but hey anythings possible.
That has been common knowledge for years.
True.
Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com
Affirmative action might have initially been about race but when White women stood up and said "what about us" race was no longer a factor. Any underrepresented minority group was then eligible, even the eskimo living on an ice floe....provided he/she could qualify.The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
See. I ALMOST agree with you. Should NOT be a race qualifier. It should be an "opportunity" qualifier. But here's the deal. It's the best that brain-dead partisan Govt can do.. The Fed Govt is NOT suited to picking winners and losers. And when they try to fix things -- they always take the EASIEST most political expedient way to claim credit.
In general -- MOST peoples's expectations for Fed Govt to solve ANYTHING is highly over-rated. And it usually results in sub-optimum solutions with MASSIVE "unintended side effects" because MOST of Fed "leadership" are moronic power hungry idealogues.. That's a true story. Not just hyperbole..
What do you mean "opportunity qualifier"?
Instead of race being the "alternative credit", it should be a leg up credit for overcoming "lack of opportunity". That pretty much covers educational inequality, economic inequality, family stability inequalities WITHOUT MAKING IT ABOUT ONLY race. That way the Inuit kid living out on a glacier -- gets the SAME "affirmative action"... IF -- they've showed ability to bust thru those handicaps and BE a potential College applicant.
I can back her up. Before AA was defanged white women benefitted in larger numbers than any other group.Are you saying that football players are recipients of AA?Yeah bullshit.....ever hear those black football players speak?
Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women.
Re: "Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women"
That's possible - Care to back that up ? Given your History of talking out your ass I doubt you can - but hey anythings possible.
That has been common knowledge for years.
True.
Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com
If a black uses affirmative action to get something, they aren't equal. If they were, they wouldn't have to use it.
The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
See. I ALMOST agree with you. Should NOT be a race qualifier. It should be an "opportunity" qualifier. But here's the deal. It's the best that brain-dead partisan Govt can do.. The Fed Govt is NOT suited to picking winners and losers. And when they try to fix things -- they always take the EASIEST most political expedient way to claim credit.
In general -- MOST peoples's expectations for Fed Govt to solve ANYTHING is highly over-rated. And it usually results in sub-optimum solutions with MASSIVE "unintended side effects" because MOST of Fed "leadership" are moronic power hungry idealogues.. That's a true story. Not just hyperbole..
What do you mean "opportunity qualifier"?
Instead of race being the "alternative credit", it should be a leg up credit for overcoming "lack of opportunity". That pretty much covers educational inequality, economic inequality, family stability inequalities WITHOUT MAKING IT ABOUT ONLY race. That way the Inuit kid living out on a glacier -- gets the SAME "affirmative action"... IF -- they've showed ability to bust thru those handicaps and BE a potential College applicant.
Andrea Mitchell is a billionaire; she doesn't have to give a shit about anyone but herself.
I can back her up. Before AA was defanged white women benefitted in larger numbers than any other group.Are you saying that football players are recipients of AA?Yeah bullshit.....ever hear those black football players speak?
Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women.
Re: "Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women"
That's possible - Care to back that up ? Given your History of talking out your ass I doubt you can - but hey anythings possible.
That has been common knowledge for years.
True.
Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com
True.
Not one white WOMAN benefited because she was white. To continue to think so means you're yet another idiot that has to rely on it because you're too stupid to be able to compete with the only group not benefiting, white males. The thing is we don't expect to benefit. We can do it on our own. Apparently all other groups can't.
I've heard that dire sentiment many times before. But realizing there is always another side of the story, I ignored the critics and probed into it a bit deeper.The link was clear enough for those who are prone to objectivuty. For those who just won't accept Blacks as equals there is always something to pick at. If the link was not good enough for you, there are hundreds more on the same topic saying the same thing in different words.Geezz. I wasn't talking about your OPost. I was talking about the sketchy back up material that you linked to.
I'm not sure green carders are the immigrants mentioned in the article.That's BS about blacks at the pinnacle of academic achievement not being hired. In terms of those IMMIGRANT (student VISA) kids, this could be true. Because it applies to ALL FOREIGN students who must get some kind of Green Card to remain and WORK in the US.
I did notice a reference to the American born progeny of African immigrants who wouldn't need a green card since they are citizens. Yet, the inference was that they too, despite superior academic achievements, were among the underemployed.
I'm a bit chagrined by your reference to bright Nigerian immigrants as the "cream of the crop" in their country as if to devalue their achievments here.That's sort of a veiled put down. You seem to have a mental block that won't allow you to see them as the cream of the crop in the diverse USA. Too bad...the facts are public...And the diff between your foreign Black students and American Black kids is that ALL of the "immigrant" students were ALREADY the "cream of the crop" in their country and I'll bet MOST come from the top 1% of the economic stratas of their home country as well.
Before you can conclude that, you have to show some reasonable proof that the immigrants referenced in the article are mostly on visas. The word immigrant can also be applied to those who have attained citizenship.NO COMPARISON at ALL between students on Visas and getting educational parity HERE at home for Black kids.
You claim to have read the links I provided, yet you missed some of the most important data indicating that Blacks and hispanics are graduating from tech scools at twice the rate they are being hired.You don't magically get INFUSED with goals and inspiration BY a College. If you choose a bad major -- that's ON YOU --- not a requirement of White Racists that you be a Sports Comme
How about a Physicist or a Plastic Surgeon or a Chemical Engineer or an Aerospace designer
You are falling behind the times..join the NAACP or something...that might be of some value in helping you to understand. some of your darker fellow Americans.
If a black uses affirmative action to get something, they aren't equal. If they were, they wouldn't have to use it.
The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
See. I ALMOST agree with you. Should NOT be a race qualifier. It should be an "opportunity" qualifier. But here's the deal. It's the best that brain-dead partisan Govt can do.. The Fed Govt is NOT suited to picking winners and losers. And when they try to fix things -- they always take the EASIEST most political expedient way to claim credit.
In general -- MOST peoples's expectations for Fed Govt to solve ANYTHING is highly over-rated. And it usually results in sub-optimum solutions with MASSIVE "unintended side effects" because MOST of Fed "leadership" are moronic power hungry idealogues.. That's a true story. Not just hyperbole..
I can back her up. Before AA was defanged white women benefitted in larger numbers than any other group.Are you saying that football players are recipients of AA?
Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women.
Re: "Actually the class/group that uses AA more than any other is white women"
That's possible - Care to back that up ? Given your History of talking out your ass I doubt you can - but hey anythings possible.
That has been common knowledge for years.
True.
Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com
True.
Not one white WOMAN benefited because she was white. To continue to think so means you're yet another idiot that has to rely on it because you're too stupid to be able to compete with the only group not benefiting, white males. The thing is we don't expect to benefit. We can do it on our own. Apparently all other groups can't.
I am retired so I do not NEED to rely on AA, dumbass.
However, during a long career in marketing, bginning in the 70's, when AA began to show a trend of benefitting white females, I witnessed enough decision making by hiring managers to recognize that there was an effort in more than enough cases to see that if there was an opportunity to hire a non white female instead of a white female that more often than not, the white female was hired. And before you say anything, this includes them being hired over more qualified male and female minorities.....not just Blacks!
Are you actually stupid enough to believe that NOT ONE white female has EVER been placed for being female AND white?
In case you are newly minted alt right milennial, there was a time in the force when "decorum" meant "keep the environment as white as possible".
SMGDH.
I've heard that dire sentiment many times before. But realizing there is always another side of the story, I ignored the critics and probed into it a bit deeper.The link was clear enough for those who are prone to objectivuty. For those who just won't accept Blacks as equals there is always something to pick at. If the link was not good enough for you, there are hundreds more on the same topic saying the same thing in different words.
I'm not sure green carders are the immigrants mentioned in the article.
I did notice a reference to the American born progeny of African immigrants who wouldn't need a green card since they are citizens. Yet, the inference was that they too, despite superior academic achievements, were among the underemployed.
I'm a bit chagrined by your reference to bright Nigerian immigrants as the "cream of the crop" in their country as if to devalue their achievments here.That's sort of a veiled put down. You seem to have a mental block that won't allow you to see them as the cream of the crop in the diverse USA. Too bad...the facts are public...
Before you can conclude that, you have to show some reasonable proof that the immigrants referenced in the article are mostly on visas. The word immigrant can also be applied to those who have attained citizenship.
You claim to have read the links I provided, yet you missed some of the most important data indicating that Blacks and hispanics are graduating from tech scools at twice the rate they are being hired.
You are falling behind the times..join the NAACP or something...that might be of some value in helping you to understand. some of your darker fellow Americans.
If a black uses affirmative action to get something, they aren't equal. If they were, they wouldn't have to use it.
The part you're not getting is WHY they apply from "unequal" status.
If an Alaskan Inuit Indian went to a wise man in the Yukon for tutoring and got "fairly decent" grades and a "good" SAT score and was otherwise qualified to attend the college --- SHOULD THAT DISADVANTAGE of previous opportunity be taked into account?? Need an answer here....
It's not about remedying INHERENT inequality because of race. It's about remedying ACTUAL inequity in the opportunities that the govt and society that they had to SURPASS to get to the college application..
It's about using race to benefit a group whose entire argument in support of such programs is about how using race is those situations is wrong. If one is going to argue using race was wrong when it denied, arguing that using race because it helps you doesn't make it OK.
See. I ALMOST agree with you. Should NOT be a race qualifier. It should be an "opportunity" qualifier. But here's the deal. It's the best that brain-dead partisan Govt can do.. The Fed Govt is NOT suited to picking winners and losers. And when they try to fix things -- they always take the EASIEST most political expedient way to claim credit.
In general -- MOST peoples's expectations for Fed Govt to solve ANYTHING is highly over-rated. And it usually results in sub-optimum solutions with MASSIVE "unintended side effects" because MOST of Fed "leadership" are moronic power hungry idealogues.. That's a true story. Not just hyperbole..
Considering the domineering theme of capitalism in our society, it wasn't long before I was able to rationalize that government has, traditionally, been the sole guardian and guarantor of Civil Rights, Health and Welfare of the people. Often, Industry produces pollution, it creates unsafe working conditions, and generally screws up the environment with Industrial Waste that contaminates rivers, as well as the air ,and subsequently threatens our food. and water supply. in my opinion, the government has been quite efficient in addressing those issues and putting a leash on those industries that have low regard for the environment and even less for the safety of workers.
There are far more dumbass black Americans who think they can be lawyers with a 4th grade literacy level.That's not most blacks, you idiot.Our colleges are full of black athletes that are illiterate. And even many black non-athletes are illiterate. And thanks to affirmative action grading, they will graduate!!!
Many of the blacks in college these days are African immigrants, and they're the top acsdemic achievers in the nation....including Asians.
there are tasting even the
These dumbasses don't understand that Nigeria has 100s of millions of people, just like the whole of the US.The average Nigerian immigrant to the U.S had close to 15 years of education on arrival.
There is no way to verify that, you fool. Of course the tarbabies SAY they are highly educated. We need to insist they take a test like the ACT or SAT and see how well they do on that. THINK
Uh, I clearly posted a source.
I didn't call Blacks intelligent either, but merely pointed out that the Nigerian elite which is a fraction of Nigeria was disproportionately responsible for the high number of years of education completed in Nigerian Americans.
Asian Americans are actually dumber than the elite in Asia.So what.? ASIANS have been sending their best and brightest too. So where was your proportional argument then?The average Nigerian immigrant to the U.S had close to 15 years of education on arrival.
There is no way to verify that, you fool. Of course the tarbabies SAY they are highly educated. We need to insist they take a test like the ACT or SAT and see how well they do on that. THINK
Uh, I clearly posted a source.
I didn't call Blacks intelligent either, but merely pointed out that the Nigerian elite which is a fraction of Nigeria was disproportionately responsible for the high number of years of education completed in Nigerian Americans.
You just hate Blacks to the extent that you will never accept any positive achievements they make. And you are not alone. Hundreds of racist authors have responded with frivolous rebuttals
and pseudo scientific reasoning to explain away their worst nightmare: the unveiling of superintelligent Africans.
But even in the segregated history of this nation many Black American achievements should have predicted the hidden human talent that would one day rise from the dark continent. The Tuskeegee airmen....Vivian Thomas...
Ben Carson...George Washington Carver..and other. Black contributors to this great nation, in effect, prophesied the present phenomenon.
The larger significance, though, is that Black Africans have elevated themselves beyond the stereotypical view relegating the lot of them to universal mental inferiority. These modern day high achlevers have all but validated the argument that their ancestors or people like them kick started civilization in ancient KMT which fell as did the later Greco-Roman Empire which supplanted them.
Because of affirmative action and bullshit "diversity" initiatives.What is the white rate? Its not even close.They are doing better than the whites, the Asians, and every other ethnic group that had a head start here. So what's your problem? You're beginning to sound desperate.That's not most blacks, you idiot.Our colleges are full of black athletes that are illiterate. And even many black non-athletes are illiterate. And thanks to affirmative action grading, they will graduate!!!
Many of the blacks in college these days are African immigrants, and they're the top acsdemic achievers in the nation....including Asians.
there are tasting even the
Why are African immigrants doing better than African Americans who by all means had a head start here?
Does this not prove that class is inherent?
The figure has changed in the first place.
In the 2009 study indeed over 43% of African immigrants, and over 42% for Asians held bachelors degrees or higher.
By 2015 it changed to 38% of African immigrants having bachelors degrees, and 54% of Asian Americans having bachelors degrees or higher.
Africans in America: Driving Black Immigrant Growth
More than Half of Asians in U.S. Have a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher
