Another Black Loser Gets Shot By Police - Jacob Blake Deserved What He Got

[Toddsterpatriot]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Exactly!

The cops must wait to see if the felon is getting a weapon from the car and then wait until he turns toward them with the weapon. Or until he shoots a bystander.

If he was getting a gun, do they have to wait until he takes the first shot, or are they allowed to fire first, in that case?

 

[pknopp]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Exactly!

The cops must want to see if the felon is getting a weapon from the car and then wait until he turns toward them with the weapon. Or until he shoots a bystander.

If he was getting a gun, do they have to wait until he takes the first shot, or are they allowed to fire first, in that case?

Police do not get to shoot a person for not listening to them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Exactly!

The cops must want to see if the felon is getting a weapon from the car and then wait until he turns toward them with the weapon. Or until he shoots a bystander.

If he was getting a gun, do they have to wait until he takes the first shot, or are they allowed to fire first, in that case?

Police do not get to shoot a person for not listening to them.

They do if they think he's going for a weapon while resisting arrest .

 

[pknopp]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Exactly!

The cops must want to see if the felon is getting a weapon from the car and then wait until he turns toward them with the weapon. Or until he shoots a bystander.

If he was getting a gun, do they have to wait until he takes the first shot, or are they allowed to fire first, in that case?

Police do not get to shoot a person for not listening to them.

They do if they think he's going for a weapon while resisting arrest .

He is black. Obviously they thought that.

 

[Orangecat]

Police do not get to shoot a person for not listening to them.

In certain situations they do.
You keep doing the childish thing of pretending the context doesn't matter.
We are not talking about every time someone doesn't listen to the police, we're talking about this specific situation.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Exactly!

The cops must want to see if the felon is getting a weapon from the car and then wait until he turns toward them with the weapon. Or until he shoots a bystander.

If he was getting a gun, do they have to wait until he takes the first shot, or are they allowed to fire first, in that case?

Police do not get to shoot a person for not listening to them.

They do if they think he's going for a weapon while resisting arrest .

He is black. Obviously they thought that.

Violent felon, resisting arrest, outstanding warrant.

No reason not to think that.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Then what did you mean by that you think blacks are scary? It seems to speak for itself. Sounds like prejudice to me

Liberals always project their own fears, ignorance, incompetence, and racism on others. The lack the cognitive ability to realize not everyone shares their flaws.

Exactly. Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Exactly. @Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Your failure to understand the context and relevance of my post only speaks to your own incompetence and lack of self awarenesss, loser.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

 

[dblack]

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

And instead of sanely condemning an obvious mistake, the excuse-makers line up to make fools of themselves.

 

[kaz]

Then what did you mean by that you think blacks are scary? It seems to speak for itself. Sounds like prejudice to me

Liberals always project their own fears, ignorance, incompetence, and racism on others. The lack the cognitive ability to realize not everyone shares their flaws.

Exactly. Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Exactly. @Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Your failure to understand the context and relevance of my post only speaks to your own incompetence and lack of self awarenesss, loser.

What context clarifies your statement that blacks are scary? I don't see how different contexts change the meaning of that. At least you're honest that blacks scare you. Kudos for that.

Just FYI, blacks are people. No more, no less. No reason to be particularly afraid of them versus anyone else

 

[kaz]

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

You made that up since you apparently saw the same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

 

[Orangecat]

Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

Guess what? Defunding them won't make their training more thorough.
If anything, the left's agenda will make these type of situations even more common.
Talk about cognitive dissonance.
*Careers*

 

[kaz]

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

And instead of sanely condemning an obvious mistake, the excuse-makers line up to make fools of themselves.

Dead cops, dead cops, yeah yeah yeah. You made your objective clear. No one could be that stupid to think someone going into their car where there could be a gun means the cop should sit and wait and see what he decides to do

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

You made that up since you apparently saw the same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

Again your incompetence let's you down.

If their goal was to prevent him from getting in his car..... they failed. The fact that they were all behind him and no one circled around the back of the vehicle to intercept him is clear evidence of their ineptitude.

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[kaz]

Then what did you mean by that you think blacks are scary? It seems to speak for itself. Sounds like prejudice to me

Liberals always project their own fears, ignorance, incompetence, and racism on others. The lack the cognitive ability to realize not everyone shares their flaws.

Exactly. Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Exactly. @Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Your failure to understand the context and relevance of my post only speaks to your own incompetence and lack of self awarenesss, loser.

What context clarifies your statement that blacks are scary? I don't see how different contexts change the meaning of that. At least you're honest that blacks scare you. Kudos for that.

Just FYI, blacks are people. No more, no less. No reason to be particularly afraid of them versus anyone else

I don't see

Exactly my point.

You changed the meaning of those words. You're a disingenuous hack

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

You made that up since you apparently saw the same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

Again your incompetence let's you down.

If their goal was to prevent him from getting in his car..... they failed. The fact that they were all behind him and no one circled around the back of the vehicle to intercept him is clear evidence of their ineptitude.

You're an idiot. There's no one someone circling around the car would have gotten there first. Just more of your wanting as you say "scary blacks" getting killed because you think somehow a race war will help Democrats

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

Guess what? Defunding them won't make their training more thorough.
If anything, the left's agenda will make these type of situations even more common.
Talk about cognitive dissonance.
*Careers*

Guess what? Defunding them won't make their training more thorough.
If anything, the left's agenda will make these type of situations even more common.
Talk about cognitive dissonance.
*Careers*

You obviously have no understanding of what "defunding" means.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Then what did you mean by that you think blacks are scary? It seems to speak for itself. Sounds like prejudice to me

Liberals always project their own fears, ignorance, incompetence, and racism on others. The lack the cognitive ability to realize not everyone shares their flaws.

Exactly. Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Exactly. @Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Your failure to understand the context and relevance of my post only speaks to your own incompetence and lack of self awarenesss, loser.

What context clarifies your statement that blacks are scary? I don't see how different contexts change the meaning of that. At least you're honest that blacks scare you. Kudos for that.

Just FYI, blacks are people. No more, no less. No reason to be particularly afraid of them versus anyone else

I don't see

Exactly my point.

You changed the meaning of those words. You're a disingenuous hack

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

You made that up since you apparently saw the same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

Again your incompetence let's you down.

If their goal was to prevent him from getting in his car..... they failed. The fact that they were all behind him and no one circled around the back of the vehicle to intercept him is clear evidence of their ineptitude.

You're an idiot. There's no one someone circling around the car would have gotten there first. Just more of your wanting as you say "scary blacks" getting killed because you think somehow a race war will help Democrats

You changed the meaning of those words. You're a disingenuous hack

I changed nothing.
That was your premise. That you "did not see". I simply agreed.

 

[kaz]

Then what did you mean by that you think blacks are scary? It seems to speak for itself. Sounds like prejudice to me

Liberals always project their own fears, ignorance, incompetence, and racism on others. The lack the cognitive ability to realize not everyone shares their flaws.

Exactly. Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Exactly. @Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Your failure to understand the context and relevance of my post only speaks to your own incompetence and lack of self awarenesss, loser.

What context clarifies your statement that blacks are scary? I don't see how different contexts change the meaning of that. At least you're honest that blacks scare you. Kudos for that.

Just FYI, blacks are people. No more, no less. No reason to be particularly afraid of them versus anyone else

I don't see

Exactly my point.

You changed the meaning of those words. You're a disingenuous hack

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

You made that up since you apparently saw the same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

Again your incompetence let's you down.

If their goal was to prevent him from getting in his car..... they failed. The fact that they were all behind him and no one circled around the back of the vehicle to intercept him is clear evidence of their ineptitude.

You're an idiot. There's no one someone circling around the car would have gotten there first. Just more of your wanting as you say "scary blacks" getting killed because you think somehow a race war will help Democrats

You changed the meaning of those words. You're a disingenuous hack

I changed nothing.
That was your premise. That you "did not see". I simply agreed.

You took those three words out of context, which completely changed the meaning. You know that cutting posts is not supposed to change the meaning. You're a disingenuous hack

 

[basquebromance]

you argue for your freedom and they call you a xhenophobe. you fight and defend your country and they call you a racist

well let me tell you something brothers: i happen to know this Jacob Blake. he is a xhenophobe. he is a homophobe. he is an islamophone...and he is a religious bigot

that doesn't mean he deserved what happened, but let's not lose sight of the facts here, my friends