Another High Tech Lynching

[PoliticalChic]

Now, let's get back on point, and why it is appropriate to indict Liberals as neo-fascists.



Back to this later 'high tech lynching.'

4. So....what's the beef that cost Brendan Eich his position at Mozilla?

"In November 2008 — five months after gay couples began marrying in the state — Californians went to the polls and voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage.

Proposition 8 amended California’s Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman and is the state’s costliest social initiative to date, with more than $83 million raised.

The initiative fight got underway after the California Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a 2000 vote that limited marriage to heterosexual couples. In their May 2008 decision, the justices said gay couples had the same fundamental right to marry.

Supporters of Proposition 8 wanted to end gay marriage in California; opponents wanted to maintain the right of same-sex couples to wed."
Proposition 8 Campaign Contributions - Los Angeles Times


A six-year old donation of $1,000 to the "Yes on 8"campaign by Eich based on a different opinion from that of the Liberal orthodoxy.
Lynch him....in the 21st century fashion.





BTW.....did you notice the "...Californians...voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage."

Need more proof that it is the Left that prevents voters from exercising their rights?
They do it by having judges throw out millions of votes

The voters in California elected the governors who appointed the Justices.

There's a reason states have constitutions. The reason is, they want their laws to be constitutional. The reasons those states have judges with the power of judicial review is to rule on the constitutionality of laws.

In America, political power rests with the people.
Judges who throw out the results of honest elections are, like you, fascists and do not belong on the bench in this nation.

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

No it's only uncivil when one of us do it, for their side it is excusable or just touchy, but never uncivil ............

How dare you label it that ...................

 

[PoliticalChic]

Now, let's get back on point, and why it is appropriate to indict Liberals as neo-fascists.



Back to this later 'high tech lynching.'

4. So....what's the beef that cost Brendan Eich his position at Mozilla?

"In November 2008 — five months after gay couples began marrying in the state — Californians went to the polls and voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage.

Proposition 8 amended California’s Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman and is the state’s costliest social initiative to date, with more than $83 million raised.

The initiative fight got underway after the California Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a 2000 vote that limited marriage to heterosexual couples. In their May 2008 decision, the justices said gay couples had the same fundamental right to marry.

Supporters of Proposition 8 wanted to end gay marriage in California; opponents wanted to maintain the right of same-sex couples to wed."
Proposition 8 Campaign Contributions - Los Angeles Times


A six-year old donation of $1,000 to the "Yes on 8"campaign by Eich based on a different opinion from that of the Liberal orthodoxy.
Lynch him....in the 21st century fashion.





BTW.....did you notice the "...Californians...voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage."

Need more proof that it is the Left that prevents voters from exercising their rights?
They do it by having judges throw out millions of votes

Eich left voluntarily.

You're a moron...oops....I mean a liar.
I almost besmirched your reputation.

 

[danielpalos]

Should they ask for "special dispensation" from all the local bishops if they claim to be abstaining from such subjectivity in the value of morals, for the present?

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

More absurd analogies by usmb favorite exaggerator PC. Anita Hill told the truth, but in a world view in which women are considered as second rate citizens by the conservative right in America she is made into the enemy. You see the same hatred of Hillary, or women who support equal rights. Women could not even win the right's debate in America. But that is consistent with the conservative religious everywhere. I often find it odd that women can hate their gender, is it insecurity? To add more absurdity to her post, PC compares the Dark age torture to words. They really are the same aren't they. lol

An Outline of the Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas Controversy

"Despite Ginni Thomas' prayers, Hill has never backed down from her allegations. Why would she, since she was so obviously telling the truth?"
Clarence Thomas vs Anita Hill She s still telling the truth - latimes

PS as for Brendan Eich, corporations are image conscious and thus the action. Personally I feel like they acted too quickly as maybe Eich could have grown. Not everything in life is so simple as PC seems to believe.

He was convicted of any of this, you know found guilty??

Why come out and make allegations that can't be substantiated??

He was found guilty and punished for these charges??

Why come out and slander a current SCJ??

Of course you are the only one besides Anita that knows the truth right??

Ever met any of these characters you seem to know so intimately??

 

[PoliticalChic]

Should they ask for "special dispensation" from all the local bishops if they claim to be abstaining from such subjectivity in the value of morals, for the present?

See if you can find an adult to explain how you should use the quote function so a Ouija board isn't necessary to fathom your posts.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now, let's get back on point, and why it is appropriate to indict Liberals as neo-fascists.



Back to this later 'high tech lynching.'

4. So....what's the beef that cost Brendan Eich his position at Mozilla?

"In November 2008 — five months after gay couples began marrying in the state — Californians went to the polls and voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage.

Proposition 8 amended California’s Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman and is the state’s costliest social initiative to date, with more than $83 million raised.

The initiative fight got underway after the California Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a 2000 vote that limited marriage to heterosexual couples. In their May 2008 decision, the justices said gay couples had the same fundamental right to marry.

Supporters of Proposition 8 wanted to end gay marriage in California; opponents wanted to maintain the right of same-sex couples to wed."
Proposition 8 Campaign Contributions - Los Angeles Times


A six-year old donation of $1,000 to the "Yes on 8"campaign by Eich based on a different opinion from that of the Liberal orthodoxy.
Lynch him....in the 21st century fashion.





BTW.....did you notice the "...Californians...voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage."

Need more proof that it is the Left that prevents voters from exercising their rights?
They do it by having judges throw out millions of votes

The voters in California elected the governors who appointed the Justices.

There's a reason states have constitutions. The reason is, they want their laws to be constitutional. The reasons those states have judges with the power of judicial review is to rule on the constitutionality of laws.

In America, political power rests with the people.
Judges who throw out the results of honest elections are, like you, fascists and do not belong on the bench in this nation.

So a referendum to outlaw handguns in a state could only be overturned by a court of fascists?

 

[NYcarbineer]

More absurd analogies by usmb favorite exaggerator PC. Anita Hill told the truth, but in a world view in which women are considered as second rate citizens by the conservative right in America she is made into the enemy. You see the same hatred of Hillary, or women who support equal rights. Women could not even win the right's debate in America. But that is consistent with the conservative religious everywhere. I often find it odd that women can hate their gender, is it insecurity? To add more absurdity to her post, PC compares the Dark age torture to words. They really are the same aren't they. lol

An Outline of the Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas Controversy

"Despite Ginni Thomas' prayers, Hill has never backed down from her allegations. Why would she, since she was so obviously telling the truth?"
Clarence Thomas vs Anita Hill She s still telling the truth - latimes

PS as for Brendan Eich, corporations are image conscious and thus the action. Personally I feel like they acted too quickly as maybe Eich could have grown. Not everything in life is so simple as PC seems to believe.

He was convicted of any of this, you know found guilty??

Why come out and make allegations that can't be substantiated??

He was found guilty and punished for these charges??

Why come out and slander a current SCJ??

Of course you are the only one besides Anita that knows the truth right??

Ever met any of these characters you seem to know so intimately??

Clarence Thomas was confirmed, dumbass.

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

So a referendum to outlaw handguns in a state could only be overturned by a court of fascists?

Be a neat hat trick, didn't SCOTUS just tell NY they did not have that power??

You gonna have to ban em at a federal level, the state level will never pass mustard.

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

Clarence Thomas was confirmed, dumbass.

I think that was my point dick lips ..................

 

[NYcarbineer]

So a referendum to outlaw handguns in a state could only be overturned by a court of fascists?

Be a neat hat trick, didn't SCOTUS just tell NY they did not have that power??

You gonna have to ban em at a federal level, the state level will never pass mustard.

So you agree that the Supreme Court ruling on the right to same sex marriage is a legitimate decision, any state referendums notwithstanding.

Tell PoliticalChic that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Now, let's get back on point, and why it is appropriate to indict Liberals as neo-fascists.



Back to this later 'high tech lynching.'

4. So....what's the beef that cost Brendan Eich his position at Mozilla?

"In November 2008 — five months after gay couples began marrying in the state — Californians went to the polls and voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage.

Proposition 8 amended California’s Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman and is the state’s costliest social initiative to date, with more than $83 million raised.

The initiative fight got underway after the California Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a 2000 vote that limited marriage to heterosexual couples. In their May 2008 decision, the justices said gay couples had the same fundamental right to marry.

Supporters of Proposition 8 wanted to end gay marriage in California; opponents wanted to maintain the right of same-sex couples to wed."
Proposition 8 Campaign Contributions - Los Angeles Times


A six-year old donation of $1,000 to the "Yes on 8"campaign by Eich based on a different opinion from that of the Liberal orthodoxy.
Lynch him....in the 21st century fashion.





BTW.....did you notice the "...Californians...voted 52% to 48% to ban same-sex marriage."

Need more proof that it is the Left that prevents voters from exercising their rights?
They do it by having judges throw out millions of votes

The voters in California elected the governors who appointed the Justices.

There's a reason states have constitutions. The reason is, they want their laws to be constitutional. The reasons those states have judges with the power of judicial review is to rule on the constitutionality of laws.

In America, political power rests with the people.
Judges who throw out the results of honest elections are, like you, fascists and do not belong on the bench in this nation.

So a referendum to outlaw handguns in a state could only be overturned by a court of fascists?

I'm gonna stick to the sort of 'high tech lynching' that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats want to make the commonplace response to disagreement with Leftist doctrine.

You know....Clarence Thomas, Brenda Eich.....the Duke lacrosse team.....

 

[ClosedCaption]

The aim was similar to that of other forms of 'execution' during the Middle Ages,

Can we be serious at all? Or is not liking someones position akin to execution? I need you to Bring it down to about a 4...you're at a 10

 

[danielpalos]

I agree to not complain, condemn, or criticize modern women in modern times being themselves, simply for the sake of gender relations.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I agree to not complain, condemn, or criticize modern women in modern times being themselves, simply for the sake of gender relations.

I cannot begin to tell you how women....worldwide!....wait with bated breath for your pronouncements about our gender.


There's a reason I cannot tell you.....

 

[danielpalos]

I agree to not complain, condemn, or criticize modern women in modern times being themselves, simply for the sake of gender relations.

I cannot begin to tell you how women....worldwide!....wait with bated breath for your pronouncements about our gender.


There's a reason I cannot tell you.....

I don't have enough capital under our form of capitalism?

 

[PoliticalChic]

So, Brendan Eich...who had spent a lifetime building Mozilla, was forced out by Liberals for that most egregious of crimes.....a thought crime.

Not anything he did that harmed another person...but having a dissenting opinion!




5. Let's document where Eich stands, this is from his blog, April 5, 2012.

"If we start to try to make “Mozilla” mean “those people who share not only the Mozilla mission but also my general political / social / religious / environmental view” we will fail. If we focus Mozilla on our shared consensus regarding the Mozilla mission and manifesto then the opportunities before us are enormous.

Mozilla’s diversity is a success condition. Our mission and our goal is truly global. Our mission taps into a shared desire for respect and control and user sovereignty that runs across cultures and across many other worldviews. We may even offend each other in some of our other views. Despite this, we share a commitment to the Mozilla mission. This is a remarkable achievement and important to our continued success.

I agree with every word of this, and I believe it applies to other communities of which I’m a member. If not, these communities will tend to splinter, and that is likely to be a net loss for everyone."
Brendan Eich Blog Archive Community and Diversity




So....what did he do that harmed anyone?

Nothing.

He merely had a different opinion: verdict for committing a thoughtcrime- "lynch him!!!"


Seems clear how Liberals would respond if the First Amendment was put to a vote.
'Common cause' with every other totalitarian dictatorship.

 

[Camp]

No it's only uncivil when one of us do it, for their side it is excusable or just touchy, but never uncivil ............

How dare you label it that ...................

No dopey. It is uncivil when you call a woman a black whore and other posters things like cocksucker and dick lips. You are what is known as a crude and obscene poster. You are the definition of an uncivil poster. The last person to lecture and whine about uncivil behavior on a message board.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Clarence Thomas's foray into playing the race card and victimology is remembered as 'brilliant' now by the RWnuttery?

Amazing.

An interesting conjecture.

Let's compare your 'guess' about the motivation behind 'high tech lynching,' with the actual view of Liberals/Democrats about when a smear is appropriate:

What was new with the Thomas nomination was the accusation of criminal wrongdoing on his part, namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill.

Even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter. Thus, a new mantra for the Left was born:



Thus, a new mantra for the Left was born:"“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”
Tom Foley, Democrat, Former Speaker of the House.

Didn't Joe McCarthy use that to great effect?

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

No it's only uncivil when one of us do it, for their side it is excusable or just touchy, but never uncivil ............

How dare you label it that ...................

No dopey. It is uncivil when you call a woman a black whore and other posters things like cocksucker and dick lips. You are what is known as a crude and obscene poster. You are the definition of an uncivil poster. The last person to lecture and whine about uncivil behavior on a message board.

Well all righty then, do you feel better now that you have that out of your little childish system??