Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If directed by the famous scientist/climatologist, Sean Hannity, right wingers will readily and forcibly deny the existence of gravity.
Yeah cause theres no math in climate science....plus he's a deniar so how dumb is hefreeman dyson is a 93 year old mathematician, not a climate scientist.
and Lemonick is a journalist, not a scientist.
I love it when the warmer/doomers get tongue tied.If directed by the famous scientist/climatologist, Sean Hannity, right wingers will readily and forcibly deny the existence of gravity.
so again, is this because you say so, or do you actually have any evidence?Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007. Deniers seem to be running out of material, if they have to resort to recycling such nonsense.
Linus Pauling pushed Vitamin C quackery. Being good in one field is no guarantee of not being a clown in another. Dyson is pushing the same nonsense denier myths that have been debunked here hundreds of times. Stupid stuff coming from a smart guy is no less stupid.
Good luck with those coffin nails. Pounding on them since 2007 has done jack, but that's probably because denier faith was insufficiently pure. You just need to _believe_ harder, and all will be well.
Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007. Deniers seem to be running out of material, if they have to resort to recycling such nonsense.
Linus Pauling pushed Vitamin C quackery. Being good in one field is no guarantee of not being a clown in another. Dyson is pushing the same nonsense denier myths that have been debunked here hundreds of times. Stupid stuff coming from a smart guy is no less stupid.
Good luck with those coffin nails. Pounding on them since 2007 has done jack, but that's probably because denier faith was insufficiently pure. You just need to _believe_ harder, and all will be well.
Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....
...it's Freeman Dyson
Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and like a warmer/doomer, you can't provide any evidence to support your position. So, how is it you prove your position?Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....
...it's Freeman Dyson
Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.
Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,
In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."
Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....
...it's Freeman Dyson
Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.
Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,
In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."
^ Global Warming "Science"
LOL
Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007. Deniers seem to be running out of material, if they have to resort to recycling such nonsense.
Linus Pauling pushed Vitamin C quackery. Being good in one field is no guarantee of not being a clown in another. Dyson is pushing the same nonsense denier myths that have been debunked here hundreds of times. Stupid stuff coming from a smart guy is no less stupid.
Good luck with those coffin nails. Pounding on them since 2007 has done jack, but that's probably because denier faith was insufficiently pure. You just need to _believe_ harder, and all will be well.
Like I've already stated, you right wing dunces are basing your denial on right wing politics....and NOT objective science.
Hey, maybe in your lifetime some right wing politician will convince you...for myself, this forum is not a good venue to educate ideological morons
Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....
...it's Freeman Dyson
Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.
Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,
In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."
Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....
...it's Freeman Dyson
Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.
Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,
In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."
Really?
So that's why the global governance crowd, the United Nations, is all for it?
Gads, you're a dunce.
Try this for a dose of reality:
Mike Hulme is Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia (UEA), [http://mikehulme.org/] and was good enough to reveal the truth in the Guardian, 2007:
“…this particular mode of scientific activity… has been labelled "post-normal" science. Climate change seems to fall in this category. Disputes in post-normal science focus as often on the process of science - who gets funded, who evaluates quality, who has the ear of policy - as on the facts of science…. Self-evidently dangerous climate change will not emerge from a normal scientific process of truth seeking,… scientists - and politicians - must trade (normal) truth for influence. If scientists want to remain listened to, to bear influence on policy, they must recognise the social limits of their truth seeking and reveal fully the values and beliefs they bring to their scientific activity…. Climate change is too important to be left to scientists - least of all the normal ones.” The appliance of science.
¬ So global warming theory did not seek to establish the truth through evidence. Instead, truth had to be traded for influence: scientists presented beliefs as a basis for policy. The shame: science has been junked in the interest of promoting ideological conviction.
"warmists" ?
Am I wrong in my perception that you nip around the edges without ever actually posting a direct contradiction to posts?
Billy Bob, you are the best advertisement for the ignorance of the 'Conservative' on this board. Your El Nino predictions have been humorously wrong, and your lies concerning your educational background a hoot to all that have read them."warmists" ?
Am I wrong in my perception that you nip around the edges without ever actually posting a direct contradiction to posts?
Left wits avoid facts... they like being told what to do, where to live, what to eat, etc.... Thy are low information types who do what they are told because it requires no thinking or a cognitive thought process..
And when it comes to Climate alarmism they are even stupider than that.. they swallow obvious lies, hook, line and sinker... They dont feel good unless they are getting hand outs which were stolen from real people who work. they are giddy about giving up your freedoms because their to lazy to keep their own..
Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....
...it's Freeman Dyson
Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.
Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,
In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."
