Another win

[buckeye45_73]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

 

[BULLDOG]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

It won't last long. The country is against all that, and the people won't let religious nuts have their way much longer.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

good deal

what is really neat

as the leftists devise their next " we really got him this time" fake news story

Trump is packing the lower courts with conservative judges

--LOL

 

[BULLDOG]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

good deal

what is really neat

as the leftists devise their next " we really got him this time" fake news story

Trump is packing the lower courts with conservative judges

--LOL

And some fine choices he is making too. He tried to appoint one idiot to a lifetime position that had never tried a case, and couldn't even answer questions that a 2nd year student should know.

 

[DJT for Life]

SCOTUS does not want to make homos and lizzies a protected classification,
especially with all this transgender stuff. Too simple for people to skirt around
things.

SCOTUS will stay away from that stuff. They'll handle the basic rights arguments but they won't be handing out a protected class verdict.

 

[DJT for Life]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

good deal

what is really neat

as the leftists devise their next " we really got him this time" fake news story

Trump is packing the lower courts with conservative judges

--LOL

And some fine choices he is making too. He tried to appoint one idiot to a lifetime position that had never tried a case, and couldn't even answer questions that a 2nd year student should know.

Are you talking about Obama and Kagan?

 

[BULLDOG]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

good deal

what is really neat

as the leftists devise their next " we really got him this time" fake news story

Trump is packing the lower courts with conservative judges

--LOL

And some fine choices he is making too. He tried to appoint one idiot to a lifetime position that had never tried a case, and couldn't even answer questions that a 2nd year student should know.

Are you talking about Obama and Kagan?

No. I'm pretty sure fox didn't report this, so I understand how you didn't know about it.

 

[Reasonable]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

A guy who is not religious in the least touting a “ win for religious freedom.”
Nice hypocrisy there.
Not surprised you’re FOR discrimination.
It’s the deplorable thing to do.

 

[Reasonable]

SCOTUS does not want to make homos and lizzies a protected classification,
especially with all this transgender stuff. Too simple for people to skirt around
things.

SCOTUS will stay away from that stuff. They'll handle the basic rights arguments but they won't be handing out a protected class verdict.

What’s a Lizzie?
With your back woods vocabulary you show everyone who you really are. Is your real name Jethro?

 

[DarkFury]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

A guy who is not religious in the least touting a “ win for religious freedom.”
Nice hypocrisy there.
Not surprised you’re FOR discrimination.
It’s the deplorable thing to do.

And WE deplorables are in charge! So shut the fuck up and sit your dumb ass down!

 

[BULLDOG]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

A guy who is not religious in the least touting a “ win for religious freedom.”
Nice hypocrisy there.
Not surprised you’re FOR discrimination.
It’s the deplorable thing to do.

And WE deplorables are in charge! So shut the fuck up and sit your dumb ass down!

Shup Furby. Nobody cares what you say.

 

[DarkFury]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

A guy who is not religious in the least touting a “ win for religious freedom.”
Nice hypocrisy there.
Not surprised you’re FOR discrimination.
It’s the deplorable thing to do.

And WE deplorables are in charge! So shut the fuck up and sit your dumb ass down!

Shup Furby. Nobody cares what you say.

Hung your scrawny ass on. My banned wall eh bull bitch?

 

[Siete]

another loser idea from Cheetoboi ... NO !

The decision by the Republican-controlled Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was unexpected and comes amid repeated promises by Trump to revive coal as the nation's top power source. The industry has been besieged by multiple bankruptcies and a steady loss of market share as natural gas and renewable energy flourish.

bet his mascara is all runny and his nose is starting to shine after Republican "brothers" keep hammering his fat ass.

 

[Siete]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

A guy who is not religious in the least touting a “ win for religious freedom.”
Nice hypocrisy there.
Not surprised you’re FOR discrimination.
It’s the deplorable thing to do.

And WE deplorables are in charge! So shut the fuck up and sit your dumb ass down!

Shup Furby. Nobody cares what you say.

Hung your scrawny ass on. My banned wall eh bull bitch?

dipshit Donnie cant even get coal support from the Republicans, you actually think he will get a damn wall ?

not a chance in hell

 

[DarkFury]

another loser idea from Cheetoboi ... NO !

The decision by the Republican-controlled Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was unexpected and comes amid repeated promises by Trump to revive coal as the nation's top power source. The industry has been besieged by multiple bankruptcies and a steady loss of market share as natural gas and renewable energy flourish.

bet his mascara is all runny and his nose is starting to shine after Republican "brothers" keep hammering his fat ass.

We can export that coal once North Korea is under water!

 

[BULLDOG]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

A guy who is not religious in the least touting a “ win for religious freedom.”
Nice hypocrisy there.
Not surprised you’re FOR discrimination.
It’s the deplorable thing to do.

And WE deplorables are in charge! So shut the fuck up and sit your dumb ass down!

Shup Furby. Nobody cares what you say.

Hung your scrawny ass on. My banned wall eh bull bitch?

Your banned wall? Is that kinda like your massive IQ you two bit fake.

 

[Windparadox]

`
`
Quite frankly, this really isn't a "win" per se. SCOTUS could not get at least 4 justices who wanted to hear the case. To wit;

'In an orders list on Monday, the Supreme Court announced it had rejected two petitions for certiorari — one filed by legal groups in the lawsuit Barber v. Bryant, the other filed by legal groups in Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant — as well as a series of other petitions pending before the Supreme Court.

Both petitions sought Supreme Court review of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in favor of the Mississippi anti-LGBT law, which enables businesses and individuals to discriminate in the name of “religious freedom.” The law was signed in 2016 by Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, who has vowed to defend the statute against legal challenges in court.The orders list provides no explanation for the rejections of these petitions, nor the vote by they were rejected. It takes a vote of at least four justices to grant certiorari, or agree to take up a case". - Source​

`
Fact is, the issue is far from settled as other SCOTUS suits related to this issue, are pending.

 

[Norman]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

Religious freedom?

This is a win for freedom period, and western civilization.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The cases were thrown out for lack of standing of the plaintiffs. Some of you might want to research that.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Supreme Court's Refusal to Hear Two "Discrimination" Cases Means WIN for Religious Freedom

well take the win you guys talk about fake books and russia

A guy who is not religious in the least touting a “ win for religious freedom.”
Nice hypocrisy there.
Not surprised you’re FOR discrimination.
It’s the deplorable thing to do.

And WE deplorables are in charge! So shut the fuck up and sit your dumb ass down!

Shup Furby. Nobody cares what you say.

apparently you do, since your responded