Anthony Kennedy just announced his retirement!

The Senate rule was changed back 2013 to include all nominations except Supreme Court Justices. That exception was scrapped by the GOP controlled Senate for Gorsuch last year. Some ya'll have such shitty memories. :lol:
You sow the wind, you reap the whirlwind.

I thought it was stupid of the Democrats to get rid of the option in the first place for all nominations except the Supreme Court. Once it was gone, there was nothing stopping the GOP from getting rid of the exception for the Supreme Court
 
Totally unbelievable


The liberals screwed up so bad.
Gorsuch's seat was a stolen seat. You shouldn't be so proud of yourselves. But of course, shame isn't part of the vocabulary if you support Trump.

His seat was not stolen. Enough with the lies
Don't call me a liar. McConnell had no right to do what he did. He ignored the Constitutional duties of the senate with a smirk. Dirty pol.

Then stop lying. The senate has the duty to advice and consent. They said no. Deal with it
 
No, Obama had a job to nominate an SC justice, period. There is no President that has ever followed your fairy tale "rule." Obama nominated someone moderate; he was as fair as McConnell wasn't.


Garland is no "moderate", he was an active anti-2nd amendment and anti life judge.

But even if he was a "moderate", replacing a conservative like Scalia with a mod would ruin the BALANCE on the court.
 
Our Supreme Court will be noticeably conservative for at least a generation or two now.
The problem is, as a Conservative, I don't want the SCOTUS conservative or liberal. I want it to be a true Constructionist Court. The SCOTUS should be ideologically neutral.
But you know they are not!
Correct. That speaks more about us as a people who have failed to uphold the vision of the founding generation than it does the Court. There used to be a reason we believed justice was blind. Now we simply don't care as long as our side gets control.

It will be telling to see if this opportunity is used to start bringing the Courts back to neutrality, meaning a Strict interpretation of the Consitution is the ONLY basis for a ruling.
 
The Senate rule was changed back 2013 to include all nominations except Supreme Court Justices. That exception was scrapped by the GOP controlled Senate for Gorsuch last year. Some ya'll have such shitty memories. :lol:
You sow the wind, you reap the whirlwind.

I thought it was stupid of the Democrats to get rid of the option in the first place for all nominations except the Supreme Court. Once it was gone, there was nothing stopping the GOP from getting rid of the exception for the Supreme Court
It was stupid. Many of us said so at the time. This is why.
 
Ah, the beginning of the second dark ages.
There is absolutely nothing funny about that, Odium. Ravi is unfortunately right.
So its the second dark ages to have a SC that rules BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION? Wow. I guess coming from people who vote for Socialists and Communists you are right.
Go. To. Hell.

It’s a bad law. Deal with it. Return the decision power to the states
Neither you nor my state has a right to interfere with what happens in my womb.
The baby has a right to life. Don't want a kid don't get pregnant! MANY ways to avoid pregnancies.
The next time you're the one who gets pregnant, let me know and we'll have a chat about it.

McConnell is the one who screwed the Constitution and you know it. You're just happy about it.
Roe can only be overturned in red states. I'm not sure it will be in any event, but the legit criticism of it is that the question was a state question under traditional federalism.
I thought it had to do with a woman's rights somehow? Which always seemed a somewhat debatable argument too, but I wasn't about to say anything.
 
The Senate rule was changed back 2013 to include all nominations except Supreme Court Justices. That exception was scrapped by the GOP controlled Senate for Gorsuch last year. Some ya'll have such shitty memories. :lol:
It should have been changed to eliminate the rule entirely.

Entirely? Or just for nominations?
 
Nope. Republicans passed the nuke option.
Nope!
Nope what?
Nope! The simple majority 51 vote rule stands for judicial appointments! Don’t you just love it? Isn’t what’s good for Zoe goose good for zen gander? Dew ewes object?
Republicans passed it for the Supreme court. You love it now, you’ll hate it one day.
Not for many years! Trump will pick youngsters! I will be dead! But payback is a bitch for Harry Reid and Chuckie Schumer!
Yeah getting payback against your fellow citizens
And just think, it only takes 51 votes to confirm. Thanks Democrats!
GOP changed that rule.

They followed Harry Reid's precedent, thus putting them on the same level as the democrats.
Same level? An SC seat is far beyond the appointments Dems passed their rule for.
 

Forum List

Back
Top