2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,236
- 52,460
There was a shooting at a Walmart, two people were killed one injured.......Walmart allows concealed carry in their stores. The day this happened, when the shooting started, armed citizens drew their weapons...and held their positions and waited for the police to arrive.....they did not shoot the police, the did not shoot each other, they were not shot by the police who arrived......minutes later......
So, the anti gun myth about armed citizens and mass public shootings is shown to be a myth...again...just like the Dallas police shooting,and the Giffords shooting....
Armed citizens do not create problems for the police.....they do allow other people to survive...since the police are 3-5 minutes out during any shooting event.....
Colorado Walmart's Armed Innocents Hampered Police. Or Not. - The Truth About Guns
First, the police weren’t on scene when the killer fired his gun; they arrived after the perp had escaped. Second, the armed good guys didn’t shoot other armed good guys (no shots were fired by anyone other than the bad guy). And third, other reports indicate that the killer scarpered after he caught sight of armed opposition.
Given these facts one could easily argue that armed defenders prevented greater loss of life. And that all the anti-gun rights hysteria about the presence of armed innocents making\ cops’ jobs harder is a bunch of horsesh*t. I mean, how exactly did these armed Americans threaten public safety?
------
Nine-point-nine times out of ten, the police are not the first responders to an act of violence. The innocent people being attacked are the first responders. The idea that they should be disarmed to make it easier for armed police to respond — most often after the fact — is to say that it’s OK to sacrifice innocent life on the altar of imagined efficiency. It isn’t.
Besides, as National Association for Gun Rights Prez Dudley Brown told the Times, “In that situation, what are people supposed to do? Lay down on the floor and draw chalk marks around themselves?”
So, the anti gun myth about armed citizens and mass public shootings is shown to be a myth...again...just like the Dallas police shooting,and the Giffords shooting....
Armed citizens do not create problems for the police.....they do allow other people to survive...since the police are 3-5 minutes out during any shooting event.....
Colorado Walmart's Armed Innocents Hampered Police. Or Not. - The Truth About Guns
First, the police weren’t on scene when the killer fired his gun; they arrived after the perp had escaped. Second, the armed good guys didn’t shoot other armed good guys (no shots were fired by anyone other than the bad guy). And third, other reports indicate that the killer scarpered after he caught sight of armed opposition.
Given these facts one could easily argue that armed defenders prevented greater loss of life. And that all the anti-gun rights hysteria about the presence of armed innocents making\ cops’ jobs harder is a bunch of horsesh*t. I mean, how exactly did these armed Americans threaten public safety?
------
Nine-point-nine times out of ten, the police are not the first responders to an act of violence. The innocent people being attacked are the first responders. The idea that they should be disarmed to make it easier for armed police to respond — most often after the fact — is to say that it’s OK to sacrifice innocent life on the altar of imagined efficiency. It isn’t.
Besides, as National Association for Gun Rights Prez Dudley Brown told the Times, “In that situation, what are people supposed to do? Lay down on the floor and draw chalk marks around themselves?”