ANTIFA terrorists freak out over new bill proposed to ban masks

[Thinker101]

It's an unconstitutional law. It bans a certain article of clothing purely because it's used by, but not exclusively by, a domestic terrorist group in America.

It's no different whatsoever than people who think that AR-15s should be banned because they're the "mass shooters' weapon of choice." Both laws are wrong, plain and simple.

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

Or grocery store, or fast food joint, or 7-11, etc., etc.

 

[jc456]

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

because he can wear a mask at Halloween.

 

[Some Guy]

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

 

[Thinker101]

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

Yes, but the mask makes it harder to pick them out of a line-up.

So you're pre-determining who's going to commit a crime.

Might as well just lock up all the black people cause i heard somewhere from someone that black people are gangbangers and therefore it stands to reason that this black person is probably a gangbanger. Let's not even wait until he actually commits a crime cause we all know he's going to, being a gangbanger and all.

It's government punishment based only on profiling, and that's so fucking wrong. The right wing complains endlessly about how the left blames white men for everything, and that sucks, doesn't it? You're doing the EXACT same thing here.

The appropriate plan of action is to profile that Antifa has a history of violence in their protests. So, step up a police presence where it stands to reason that Antifa will be. If someone commits a crime, take them down and charge them for the actual crime they committed, not the attire they're wearing before/while committing said crime.

And the need to wear a mask?

People wear masks on Halloween cause it's fun. People wear various articles of the same clothing to show solidarity.

I agree that Antifa should be looked at with a high level of scrunity based on their actions. But pre-arresting them for crimes not yet committed? Nope. Perhaps something added onto a charge when a crime is actually committed, like evading arrest via the mask or something like that. But as soon as we start pre-arresting people based on what they're wearing and where they are: that's real fascism.

WTF, every day is not Halloween....and majority of them on Halloween are under 12.

 

[jc456]

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

Or grocery store, or fast food joint, or 7-11, etc., etc.

hell, this stupid fk isn't considered a sharpest knife on the planet. maybe universe.

 

[bodecea]

Left-Wing Antifa Terrorists 'Freaking Out' over Proposed 'Unmasking' Law | Breitbart

Awww poor things won't be able to commit terrorist acts and get away with it now! Poor things.

The KKK has a few objections.

 

[jc456]

Left-Wing Antifa Terrorists 'Freaking Out' over Proposed 'Unmasking' Law | Breitbart

Awww poor things won't be able to commit terrorist acts and get away with it now! Poor things.

The KKK has a few objections.

the demolosers object? it's them. same thing.

 

[Some Guy]

It's an unconstitutional law. It bans a certain article of clothing purely because it's used by, but not exclusively by, a domestic terrorist group in America.

It's no different whatsoever than people who think that AR-15s should be banned because they're the "mass shooters' weapon of choice." Both laws are wrong, plain and simple.

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

If a bank has a policy that no one can wear a mask in their establishment then that's fine. If you wear a mask in there with that policy in place then you reap what you sow. It's an entirely different ball game when we're talking about public spaces.

 

[jc456]

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

 

[Thinker101]

Left-Wing Antifa Terrorists 'Freaking Out' over Proposed 'Unmasking' Law | Breitbart

Awww poor things won't be able to commit terrorist acts and get away with it now! Poor things.

The KKK has a few objections.

You may want to consider a new group of friends.

 

[jc456]

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

If a bank has a policy that no one can wear a mask in their establishment then that's fine. If you wear a mask in there with that policy in place then you reap what you sow. It's an entirely different ball game when we're talking about public spaces.

 

[iceberg]

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

Yes, but the mask makes it harder to pick them out of a line-up.

So you're pre-determining who's going to commit a crime.

Might as well just lock up all the black people cause i heard somewhere from someone that black people are gangbangers and therefore it stands to reason that this black person is probably a gangbanger. Let's not even wait until he actually commits a crime cause we all know he's going to, being a gangbanger and all.

It's government punishment based only on profiling, and that's so fucking wrong. The right wing complains endlessly about how the left blames white men for everything, and that sucks, doesn't it? You're doing the EXACT same thing here.

The appropriate plan of action is to profile that Antifa has a history of violence in their protests. So, step up a police presence where it stands to reason that Antifa will be. If someone commits a crime, take them down and charge them for the actual crime they committed, not the attire they're wearing before/while committing said crime.

And the need to wear a mask?

People wear masks on Halloween cause it's fun. People wear various articles of the same clothing to show solidarity.

I agree that Antifa should be looked at with a high level of scrunity based on their actions. But pre-arresting them for crimes not yet committed? Nope. Perhaps something added onto a charge when a crime is actually committed, like evading arrest via the mask or something like that. But as soon as we start pre-arresting people based on what they're wearing and where they are: that's real fascism.

i believe the law said anyone caught inciting violence or breaking the law WHILE WEARING A MASK got 2 years added to their sentence.

so they're not sitting around exchanging smores and singing campfire songs in a casper mask so just stop it.

 

[Some Guy]

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

The respect of people's individual rights.

 

[jc456]

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

The respect of people's individual rights.

that they don't share with those they expect to go after? you just didn't write that, right? dude, you need to get to a sharpener now, you are truly not the sharpest knife on the planet.

 

[Thinker101]

it is concealing your identity, much different than just putting socks on. puppet. again, I see you're ok with violence.

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

If a bank has a policy that no one can wear a mask in their establishment then that's fine. If you wear a mask in there with that policy in place then you reap what you sow. It's an entirely different ball game when we're talking about public spaces.

So you're saying we need a policy....isn't that the point of this thread? I can see a policy put in place, we certainly need one because there is a shortage of common sense.

 

[Thinker101]

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

The respect of people's individual rights.

So for some reason your individual rights are more important than those of others.
antifa violence - Bing video

 

[Some Guy]

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

The respect of people's individual rights.

that they don't share with those they expect to go after? you just didn't write that, right? dude, you need to get to a sharpener now, you are truly not the sharpest knife on the planet.

And i've said that if they commit a crime, they should be punished under the law. What are you missing here?

 

[jc456]

And what does concealing your face have to do with assaulting people? The answer is nothing. My identity doesn't matter in the slightest if i'm not committing a crime. All this vaguely worded law does is target people based on a broad definition of a piece of attire combined with a broad definition of a certain activity.

I hate Antifa. I think they're fucking idiots. But they deserve to be able to protest at long as they're not assaulting people and committing crimes. If they commit an actual crime like assault or damaging property, then arrest and charge them for that.

what?

are you truly this stupid?
you can't be?

why does a bank robber wear a mask?

what is the purpose of the mask then? can you honestly answer?

I highly doubt it, but I'll ask anyway.

And you don't get the point that someone walking into a bank with a mask on and doing a simple withdrawal or deposit to their account isn't a crime, is it? Nope. Arresting and charging someone for wearing something in a certain place is assuming you have precognition.

See my post above this one. Does it stand to reason that someone wearing a mask in a bank is there to rob it. Probably, yes. That's why armed guards are at banks, and will be on high alert to react if they see someone with a mask on.

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

If a bank has a policy that no one can wear a mask in their establishment then that's fine. If you wear a mask in there with that policy in place then you reap what you sow. It's an entirely different ball game when we're talking about public spaces.

So you're saying we need a policy....isn't that the point of this thread? I can see a policy put in place, we certainly need one because there is a shortage of common sense.

respect and patriotism is missing as well. They wear masks so their parents can't see their child being an asswipe criminal.

 

[Some Guy]

Go ahead and walk into your bank with a mask on and see how that goes.

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

The respect of people's individual rights.

So for some reason your individual rights are more important than those of others.
antifa violence - Bing video

I'd like to see Antifa go back to their parents' basement as much as you would. But the fact remains that you can't (and shouldn't) be able to target people based on what they're wearing. That's all this is about. If they assault someone then they should be apprehended and charged accordingly.

 

[Doc1]

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

The respect of people's individual rights.

So for some reason your individual rights are more important than those of others.
antifa violence - Bing video

I'd like to see Antifa go back to their parents' basement as much as you would. But the fact remains that you can't (and shouldn't) be able to target people based on what they're wearing. That's all this is about. If they assault someone then they should be apprehended and charged accordingly.

Or (like in Portland) get knocked on their asses when they act up.

 

[jc456]

dude, can't make this shit up. these leftists fks are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Seriously, this fk thinks he can walk up to a teller with a mask on.

If you think pre-arresting people for crimes they might commit based on how they're dressed and where they are is ok, then you're an honest to goodness fascist.

what's your issue?

The respect of people's individual rights.

that they don't share with those they expect to go after? you just didn't write that, right? dude, you need to get to a sharpener now, you are truly not the sharpest knife on the planet.

And i've said that if they commit a crime, they should be punished under the law. What are you missing here?

i'm not missing a thing. I'm watching you implode all over the board today.