Anything But Islam Syndrome

[longknife]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

 

[The VOR]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

Actually, you and your fellow nutters are the ones that share common values with Sharia law.

Sharia law and Republicans both love:

-Denying the right to gay marriage
-Suppressing feminism
-Adherence to scripture (different books, but they're of the same family of religions)
-Strict, conservative values.-Religious leaders help make the laws.
-Many Sharia men proudly own guns ( preferably an AK47 )
-Sharia law encourages marriage and family.
-Pro Death Penalty
-Abortion banned
-Prayer encouraged in public places.
-Oppose Leftist elements in society.
-Religion in government

 

[Mac1958]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

.

 

[MACAULAY]

There is only one way to understand Democratic Party Politics today: That their sole policy is to Whore for Votes from those who are against traditional America--which has created the greatest society in history.

Democrats are whoring for votes in the Muslim community, figuring they have the Homosexuals locked up, and hoping not too many Muslim Democrats throw not too many Homosexual Democrats off buildings before the next election.

 

[Pogo]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

Attacking bad logic like the endless cum hoc fallacies for the fallacies they are is not in any way "defending" the object of the fallacious attack. This is itself another fallacy, and one that should be outgrown by, say, junior high school.

 

[emilynghiem]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

I think it's called "let the rightwing fight that battle for us"

Same with why it's the Christian Prolife groups raising issues with genocide of female babies by forced abortion in China

"let the rightwing fight that battle for us"

Same with why the Singlepayer Universal Health advocates remain silent on the ACA mandates they equally contest,
but on different grounds, as collusion with big corporate insurance interests to keep making profits off health care

"let the rightwing fight that battle for us"

And why there are no legalization advocates pushing for "spiritual healing" to end drug addiction and abuse

"let the rightwing fight that battle for us"

I guess this is like a repetitive liturgy, where the people respond:

"let the rightwing fight that battle for us"

 

[Mac1958]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

Attacking bad logic like the endless cum hoc fallacies for the fallacies they are is not in any way "defending" the object of the fallacious attack. This is itself another fallacy, and one that should be outgrown by, say, junior high school.

None of which changes the fact that Islam is the PC-protected religion.

.

 

[emilynghiem]

There is only one way to understand Democratic Party Politics today: That their sole policy is to Whore for Votes from those who are against traditional America--which has created the greatest society in history.

Democrats are whoring for votes in the Muslim community, figuring they have the Homosexuals locked up, and hoping not too many Muslim Democrats throw not too many Homosexual Democrats off buildings before the next election.

And none of this would affect other voters and policies
if we got smart and declared the political parties to be political religions that need to remain separated from govt.

The Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, Jews, Catholics and Protestants all select their own leaders and decide their own inhouse policies for their members, and it doesn't get imposed on the rest of the nation by "separation of church and state."

When are we going to figure out that political religions should not be imposed on the public as faith-based beliefs any more than traditionally recognized religions.

And where there is no way to separate the belief from govt, such as having different BELIEFS about prison laws, marriage or immigration laws, abortion or euthanasia, then we could agree to decide policies by CONSENSUS if these involved political BELIEFS that people cannot be forced to change by govt. Either agree on laws that accommodate all beliefs, or remove them from the state and only keep laws that all people agree represent them so these are PUBLIC not private.

 

[Pogo]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

Attacking bad logic like the endless cum hoc fallacies for the fallacies they are is not in any way "defending" the object of the fallacious attack. This is itself another fallacy, and one that should be outgrown by, say, junior high school.

None of which changes the fact that Islam is the PC-protected religion.

Actually as far as I'm concerned it completely blows its legs off.
Unless of course you can, y'know, document where this "protection" is.



I get this tired old childish horseshit all the time, claims of "Muslim apologist", "Obama supporter", "baby killer", "Zimmerman whateverer", "gun control advocate", "socialist", on and on, even though I've actually indicated zero on any of those topics. The retards that fling these turds do so simply on the basis that I've failed to jump on the demonization wagon with them, so in their tiny little five-year-old level mind that must mean I have the opposite position. Because they're too dense to grasp that maybe it ain't that simple.

That's exactly why I keep challenging people to document their shit. And why they can never do so.

Edit -- as you yourself will now demonstrate in your next post:

On any thread that has anything to do with Islam.

Of course, you will pretend not to see it.

QED.

 

[emilynghiem]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

Attacking bad logic like the endless cum hoc fallacies for the fallacies they are is not in any way "defending" the object of the fallacious attack. This is itself another fallacy, and one that should be outgrown by, say, junior high school.

None of which changes the fact that Islam is the PC-protected religion.

.

The advantage Mac1958 is that because the Muslims are respected,
then when it comes time to defend Constitutional values and principles,
the American Muslim leaders may serve as the best allies to the Conservatives
by being able to communicate and establish agreement with the Democrats
who don't get it when Constitutional issues are presented by Republican Conservative Christians.

If Democrats can receive the same input and corrections from Muslims,
this may be the avenue to reaching an agreement on Constitutional laws and ethics.

If they left won't hear it or receive it from rightwing Constitutionalists,
maybe the Muslim Constitutionalists might be able to drive the points home.

Sometimes the party you least suspect may turn out to be your saving grace and neighbor in Christ, like the Good Samaritan in the Bible normally rejected as the most unholy of all people. This is the one example Jesus used to demonstrate who might turn out to be on your side, using the denomination of Samaritan that was most rejected at the time as the good guy.

 

[Mac1958]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

Attacking bad logic like the endless cum hoc fallacies for the fallacies they are is not in any way "defending" the object of the fallacious attack. This is itself another fallacy, and one that should be outgrown by, say, junior high school.

None of which changes the fact that Islam is the PC-protected religion.

Actually as far as I'm concerned it completely blows its legs off.
Unless of course you can, y'know, document where this "protection" is.

On any thread that has anything to do with Islam.

Of course, you will pretend not to see it.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

This fails as a straw man fallacy, you’ve contrived a lie which misrepresents the position of your opponents.

‘Liberals’ do not ‘side with Islam.’

As already correctly noted, exposing the fallacies common to most on the right concerning Muslims and Islam – such as the composition fallacy that ‘all Muslims’ are ‘terrorists’ when a single Muslim commits an act or terror – is to neither ‘defend’ Islam nor ‘condone’ the acts of terrorists who are incidentally Muslim.

The fact is that the vast majority of Muslims are not ‘terrorists,’ and Islam is not ‘responsible’ for acts of terror.

Moreover, any Muslim who advocates gay Americans be denied their Constitutional rights will be opposed just as aggressively by liberals as any Christian who seeks to do the same, and liberals believe that a Muslim business owner whose business is in a jurisdiction subject to a public accommodations law with a provision for sexual orientation should be likewise enjoined from discriminating against a gay patron as a Christian business owner would.

 

[emilynghiem]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

Attacking bad logic like the endless cum hoc fallacies for the fallacies they are is not in any way "defending" the object of the fallacious attack. This is itself another fallacy, and one that should be outgrown by, say, junior high school.

None of which changes the fact that Islam is the PC-protected religion.

Actually as far as I'm concerned it completely blows its legs off.
Unless of course you can, y'know, document where this "protection" is.

I see more people on the rightwing side rallying PUBLICLY against religious and political abuses
of Jihadists and Shariah to mean religious-based govt laws and mandates without representation or due process.

Two of the most vocally outspoken anti-Jihadist advocates on the rightwing side
* Pam Geller
* Walid Shoebat (albeit contested as a propagandist by Peace and Justice Muslim leaders such as Mustafaa Carroll)

If the public expects the most prominent opposition to Islam to be voiced and represented
by the Conservative CHRISTIANS, then of course, people are going to DEFER to that group to do the public outreach.

I notice a difference in spoken/radio media versus printed/free press media:
Radio speech tends to be more geared toward rightwing preaching (than leftwing which can get very analytical
and better expressed through written media rather than trying to explain things in a LINEAR radio dialogue)

On the left hand side of the equation, of the groups pushing to stop bullying, rape, violence against women, etc.
most of this is traditionally driven by LEFTWING and feminist groups that get more of the media attention.

The rightwing approach to addressing the cause of abuse is already built into the Christian and spiritual healing outreach,
but this is kept OUT of the mainstream media. The testimonials and outreach programs are well established
within the religious and church communities, whether this is credited or rejected as "religious dogma" by the leftwing.

So instead, the media focuses on the secular leftwing approaches and makes it look like those are the main advocates.

I think both groups find their political niches and get used to fighting those battles,
while expecting the opposite group to fight their own traditional battles.

If people are honest, they'd see that both groups are DEPENDING on the other for check and balance
because neither group can police all the issues out there. The Environmentalists with the Greens also
tend to pick their battles that the liberal Democrats are missing or messing up. And the Libertarians
also pick their battles to check fellow Conservatives that are otherwise running the Republican party into the ground.

We really need all hands on board to address and check all the areas against abuses of political or religious authority.
If each party specializes in certain fields, why not work together, cover them all, and redress ALL grievances affecting taxpayers? Why not delegate to each party the task of assessing damages and debts owed to the public, from corporate abuse or govt waste, and negotiating agreements to collect back on that restitution. Why not use all parties for good?

 

[Vigilante]

 

[emilynghiem]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

This fails as a straw man fallacy, you’ve contrived a lie which misrepresents the position of your opponents.

‘Liberals’ do not ‘side with Islam.’

As already correctly noted, exposing the fallacies common to most on the right concerning Muslims and Islam – such as the composition fallacy that ‘all Muslims’ are ‘terrorists’ when a single Muslim commits an act or terror – is to neither ‘defend’ Islam nor ‘condone’ the acts of terrorists who are incidentally Muslim.

The fact is that the vast majority of Muslims are not ‘terrorists,’ and Islam is not ‘responsible’ for acts of terror.

Moreover, any Muslim who advocates gay Americans be denied their Constitutional rights will be opposed just as aggressively by liberals as any Christian who seeks to do the same, and liberals believe that a Muslim business owner whose business is in a jurisdiction subject to a public accommodations law with a provision for sexual orientation should be likewise enjoined from discriminating against a gay patron as a Christian business owner would.

Dear C_Clayton_Jones
Where are the equal legal actions, lawsuits, fines and judgments against Muslim bakers?
Why are their businesses carefully avoided while Christian businesses have been sued?

As for the "guilt by association" tying all other Muslims to the crimes of Jihadist terrorists,
isn't this similar to how the leftwing blames all Republicans and Conservatives for dereguation
that is abused by corporate interests to run amok at taxpayer expense?

The same way the Conservatives "don't do enough" to police the corporations from abuse,
including not watching and policing the military spending and contracts when they CLAIM to be for
limited Constitutional govt, isn't that similar to how the leftwing and the peaceful Muslims are
seen as 'not doing enough" to address and stop abuses either!

So it looks like they are 'enabling' the abuses by looking the other way
and/or expecting the other group to step in and advocate for corrections.

 

[emilynghiem]

The TRUE Muslims stand in brotherhood with Jews and Christians as people of the Book
all under Scriptural Authority and the Mosaic Laws/Adamic lineage under the same God of Abraham.

If this was enforced correctly then all people would be UNITED since
the same God that gave us Scriptural Laws and Authority gave us Natural Laws
that the Constitution is based on. There would not BE a split demonizing the
Christians and Conservatives if the President were truly following the unifying spirit of truth
that sets humanity free from error, division and strife.

Clearly politics has gotten in the way of that path.
So we as Christians and defenders of the Constitution should be
in the business of correcting and removing the obstructions in way of that true path leading to real peace and justice.

NOT the "false peace" that is warned about as preceding the TRUE peace that comes with real unity we have yet to see.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

Attacking bad logic like the endless cum hoc fallacies for the fallacies they are is not in any way "defending" the object of the fallacious attack. This is itself another fallacy, and one that should be outgrown by, say, junior high school.

None of which changes the fact that Islam is the PC-protected religion.

.

Wrong.

There is no such thing as ‘PC,’ it’s a myth contrived by you and others on the right; and to seek to propagate a straw man fallacy is the same as to have committed the fallacy itself.

Islam is not subject to any more ‘protections’ than any other religion – Muslims are entitled to First Amendment protections (Free Exercise Clause), they are at liberty to practice their faith as they see fit absent unwarranted government interference; and Muslims are prohibited from seeking to enact religious dogma into secular law (Establishment Clause), the same as Christians, Jews, or persons of any other faith.

Again, cite any example of a Muslim advocating that Islamic dogma be codified with the force of law and liberals will be the first to see such a measure defeated via the political process or struck down in a court of law.

 

[longknife]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

.

When will people realize - IT'S NOT A RELIGION!!!

It's a blood-thirsty cult dedicated to slaughtering anyone who does not agree with its goal of world domination.

 

[Pogo]

Yet Leftists in America will actually side with those who will kill gays over those who’d rather not bake a cake for them. Why? Anything but Islam syndrome.


Examples of this are simply too numerous to cite. Reading this article puts a solid basis forth for the spread of this deadly and very UnAmerican activity that tries to destroy the very foundation of this country.


Read more: Articles A New Syndrome Anything But Islam

The PC-protected religion.

.

When will people realize - IT'S NOT A RELIGION!!!

It's a blood-thirsty cult dedicated to slaughtering anyone who does not agree with its goal of world domination.

Yeah yeah yeah, when "they" do it, "It's a blood-thirsty cult dedicated to slaughtering anyone who does not agree with its goal of world domination"; when "we" do it, it's a "lone nutjob who no way represents Christians/conservatives/white people/etcetcetc".

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

As sad as it is I'm glad ISIS does not have another murder to claim as a victory.