AOC Nods Agreement With Nutcase That Thinks We Should Start Eating Babies

Status
Not open for further replies.
SAVE THE PLANET
EAT THE BABIES

AOC was holding a townhall and some woman who sounded foreign stood up and said we only had months to live and we needed to start eating babies.

AOC nodded approval for what this lunatic was saying......

Problem being this is the dirty little secret that the left is hiding from the American public.
They're busy murdering humans all over the planet.....and now it's coming out.

The left claims it was a Pro-Trump group that planted this nut in the crowd........so that explains why AOC agreed with everything she said.....

It was a lady from a group that begins with an R iirc.
They 'follow' some guy who ran for president 8 times.


that's all I can remember
Yeah....and you'll believe any lie the left pushes on you without question.
 
Waste-not, want-not.

I mean, not ALL baby parts are of retail value.

So what to do with the leftovers?

Eating those bits is simple "green" eco-responsibility at its finest.

For normal people?

Not so much.
 
>> I am assured by our merchants, that a boy or a girl before twelve years old, is no saleable commodity, and even when they come to this age, they will not yield above three pounds, or three pounds and half a crown at most, on the exchange; which cannot turn to account either to the parents or kingdom, the charge of nutriments and rags having been at least four times that value.

I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection.

I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricasie, or a ragoust.

I do therefore humbly offer it to publick consideration, that of the hundred and twenty thousand children, already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle, or swine, and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore, one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in sale to the persons of quality and fortune, through the kingdom, always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump, and fat for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends, and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt, will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.... <<

Jonathan Swift --- 17fucking29, That's 290 years ago.​

Literacy is dead.


Yeah, except, you asshat......

https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/scientist-suggests-eating-human-flesh-to-fight-climate-change/

A Swedish scientist speaking at Stockholm summit last week offered an unusual possible tactic in combating global climate change: eating human flesh.

Stockholm School of Economics professor and researcher Magnus Soderlund reportedly said he believes eating human meat, derived from dead bodies, might be able to help save the human race if only a world society were to “awaken the idea.”

Fox Noise quoting the Epoch Times :laugh2:

I mean why stop there? Alex Jones, Jim Fucking Hoft and The Onion are feeling left out. Nuttin' like credible sources, amirite?

This just in Bubbles --- clearly I ain't the only one literate enough to have heard of a Jonathan Swift satire from three hundred years ago.
 



Interesting commentary (not interesting enough to watch 24 minutes, only watched the first 10). Not sure if he addressed beyond the "we must eat the babies" but for me the clear give away that this was a troll was when the women threw in "even if we bomb Russia it won't be enough". Of all the places to bomb for population control the woman suggests Russia...
 



Interesting commentary (not interesting enough to watch 24 minutes, only watched the first 10). Not sure if he addressed beyond the "we must eat the babies" but for me the clear give away that this was a troll was when the women threw in "even if we bomb Russia it won't be enough". Of all the places to bomb for population control the woman suggests Russia...


Reagan did that too.



Y'all gotta watch your history. ALL of this is derivative.
 
The fact that AOC addresses her in any fashion is absurd. The nut should have been escorted out in a straight jacket.

No, she should have nodded in agreement. It is verified science.

Swedish scientist advocates eating humans to combat climate change
So are you into cannibalism too?

Shall I call the men in the White Suits to come get you?

Are you implying that only MEN in WHITE suits can do the job?

But please don't blame me, I am only the messenger. Human eating is the future, hail AOC.
 
they should take a poll. what is your preference? a white baby .. or a non white baby for lunch
 
Here's AOC's attempt to distance herself from this nutjob:

Ocasio-Cortez later tweeted that she was concerned the woman at the town hall was “suffering from a mental condition” and that she wanted to treat her with compassion. She also admonished right-wingers on Twitter for mocking the woman.

After the video went viral, a group called LaRouche PAC — which is affiliated with people with a long history of peddling unfounded conspiracy theories that has now turned pro-Trump — took credit for planting the woman at the town hall meeting in an attempt to “troll” Ocasio-Cortez and mock the climate change crisis.

The fringe group, founded by conspiracy theorist Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr., who died earlier this year, believes climate change is a hoax and compares carbon dioxide reduction policies to “genocide.”

“LaRouchePAC trolls AOC, AOC doesn't rule out eating babies,” the group said on Twitter.


Ocasio-Cortez later said in a tweet, “Turns out the woman yelling was a Trump supporter ‍♀️.”

The LaRouche PAC has been running an “Eat the Children” campaign modeled on Jonathan Swift’s satirical 1729 essay A Modest Proposal, which attempted to highlight England’s exploitation of the impoverished Irish by suggesting that poor Irish families sell their children as food to wealthy landlords.

In response to a tweet wondering if the town hall speaker was a plant, LaRouche PAC wrote, “It was us,” adding, “Malthusianism isn’t new, Jonathan Swift knew that. Sometimes, only satire works.”

Daniel Burke, who is affiliated with the LaRouche PAC, posted an “Eat the babies” poster of Ocasio-Cortez on his Facebook account Thursday.

sub-buzz-729-1570216948-1.png

Facebook / Daniel Burke
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-10-5_10-40-15.gif
    upload_2019-10-5_10-40-15.gif
    42 bytes · Views: 7
>> I am assured by our merchants, that a boy or a girl before twelve years old, is no saleable commodity, and even when they come to this age, they will not yield above three pounds, or three pounds and half a crown at most, on the exchange; which cannot turn to account either to the parents or kingdom, the charge of nutriments and rags having been at least four times that value.

I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection.

I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricasie, or a ragoust.

I do therefore humbly offer it to publick consideration, that of the hundred and twenty thousand children, already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle, or swine, and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore, one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in sale to the persons of quality and fortune, through the kingdom, always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump, and fat for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends, and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt, will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.... <<

Jonathan Swift --- 17fucking29, That's 290 years ago.​

Literacy is dead.


Yeah, except, you asshat......

https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/scientist-suggests-eating-human-flesh-to-fight-climate-change/

A Swedish scientist speaking at Stockholm summit last week offered an unusual possible tactic in combating global climate change: eating human flesh.

Stockholm School of Economics professor and researcher Magnus Soderlund reportedly said he believes eating human meat, derived from dead bodies, might be able to help save the human race if only a world society were to “awaken the idea.”

Fox Noise quoting the Epoch Times :laugh2:

I mean why stop there? Alex Jones, Jim Fucking Hoft and The Onion are feeling left out. Nuttin' like credible sources, amirite?

This just in Bubbles --- clearly I ain't the only one literate enough to have heard of a Jonathan Swift satire from three hundred years ago.
CNN quoting "sources familiar..."

Fuck off.
 
>> I am assured by our merchants, that a boy or a girl before twelve years old, is no saleable commodity, and even when they come to this age, they will not yield above three pounds, or three pounds and half a crown at most, on the exchange; which cannot turn to account either to the parents or kingdom, the charge of nutriments and rags having been at least four times that value.

I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection.

I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricasie, or a ragoust.

I do therefore humbly offer it to publick consideration, that of the hundred and twenty thousand children, already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle, or swine, and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore, one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in sale to the persons of quality and fortune, through the kingdom, always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump, and fat for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends, and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt, will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.... <<

Jonathan Swift --- 17fucking29, That's 290 years ago.​

Literacy is dead.


Yeah, except, you asshat......

https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/scientist-suggests-eating-human-flesh-to-fight-climate-change/

A Swedish scientist speaking at Stockholm summit last week offered an unusual possible tactic in combating global climate change: eating human flesh.

Stockholm School of Economics professor and researcher Magnus Soderlund reportedly said he believes eating human meat, derived from dead bodies, might be able to help save the human race if only a world society were to “awaken the idea.”

Fox Noise quoting the Epoch Times :laugh2:

I mean why stop there? Alex Jones, Jim Fucking Hoft and The Onion are feeling left out. Nuttin' like credible sources, amirite?

This just in Bubbles --- clearly I ain't the only one literate enough to have heard of a Jonathan Swift satire from three hundred years ago.
CNN quoting "sources familiar..."

Fuck off.

There is no mention of any "CNN" there Evelyn Wood. There is however a direct link to the far-right wackadoodle "Epoch Times", a favourite tool of that jackoff poster MindWars.

>> During a six month period in 2019, The Epoch Times spent more than $1.5 million on about 11,000 Facebook ads that NBC News said were "pro-Trump advertisements". NBC said the amount spent was more than any group except the Trump campaign itself.[7][10] Political ad spending in April 2019 through a Facebook account called "Coverage of the Trump Presidency by The Epoch Times" exceeded that of any politician except Trump and Democrat Joe Biden.[6][65] In May 2019, journalist Judd Legum wrote that The Epoch Times was running "hundreds of Facebook ads (some of which are still active) boosting Donald Trump and floating conspiracy theories about Joe Biden".[6][65]

In August 2019, Facebook banned The Epoch Times from advertising on its platform, after finding that the newspaper broke Facebook's political transparency rules by publishing pro-Trump subscription ads under page names such as “Honest Paper” and “Pure American Journalism." A Facebook representative told NBC: "Over the past year we removed accounts associated with The Epoch Times for violating our ad policies, including trying to get around our review systems." [8] << (Wiki)​

Basically Jim Fucking Hoft in Chinese.
 
Hilarious
Looks at these loons trying to paint this group as connected to Trump.
1) They have groups worldwide.
2) They started 50 years ago.
3) Most countries, including the U.S. has considered them a cult, and Lyndon LaRouche a cult leader.
4) They have been all over the map in conspiracy theories for DECADES.

Their beliefs are:
1) Anti-Capitalist - yeah Trump is very anti-capitalist. :rolleyes:
2) They are anti-globalist. Which distanced them from Democrats years ago.
3) They are pro labor, and want to radically change the worlds economic system. And we all know how Pro Labor Trump is.
4) They are anti-semite. Yeah...Trump hates them Jews.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top