"AOC Plan will cause Mass Death"- Greenpeace

Patrick left Greenpeace in the mid 80's & makes money pedaling his bullshit to corporate interests.

Most of what I read that he said was based on ignorance of the NGD.

Like when he questioned how food would get to market as if there would be no trucks.

He has always been an AGW denier.
 
Patrick left Greenpeace in the mid 80's & makes money pedaling his bullshit to corporate interests.

Most of what I read that he said was based on ignorance of the NGD.

Like when he questioned how food would get to market as if there would be no trucks.

He has always been an AGW denier.


The New Green Deal would do any with the internal combustion engine in 10 years. We don't have any other way to get the food to market.
 
Libs are so painfully predictable. If they can’t argue the facts, they try to discredit the source.

Just say AOC’s plan is stupid. It’s not tough.
 
Why not check with the Greenpeace co-founder then?

Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) on Twitter


From Wing Nut Daily so you know it has to be true.


Breitbart is covering this important story as well. I know the Lame Stream Media wants to hide this scoop from the public, but that's just due to the fact that Hitler and Genocide gin up a lot of negativity in their focus groups.

Greenpeace Co-Founder: AOC's Green New Deal -- ‘Pompous Little Twit'
Breitbart?

Well that adds veracity.

View attachment 248668
 
Why not check with the Greenpeace co-founder then?

Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) on Twitter


From Wing Nut Daily so you know it has to be true.


Breitbart is covering this important story as well. I know the Lame Stream Media wants to hide this scoop from the public, but that's just due to the fact that Hitler and Genocide gin up a lot of negativity in their focus groups.

Greenpeace Co-Founder: AOC's Green New Deal -- ‘Pompous Little Twit'
Breitbart?

Well that adds veracity.

View attachment 248668
Who skipped out 30+ years ago? What kinda relevance do you think he has now?
 
From Wing Nut Daily so you know it has to be true.


Breitbart is covering this important story as well. I know the Lame Stream Media wants to hide this scoop from the public, but that's just due to the fact that Hitler and Genocide gin up a lot of negativity in their focus groups.

Greenpeace Co-Founder: AOC's Green New Deal -- ‘Pompous Little Twit'
Breitbart?

Well that adds veracity.

View attachment 248668

Well it's a valid Twitter account so where is WAPO? Oh wait.... It's not game news so they're not interested.

Jo
 
Skipped out? No, he saw the science being manipulated. He quit his own baby in protest.
Why not check with the Greenpeace co-founder then?

Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) on Twitter


From Wing Nut Daily so you know it has to be true.


Breitbart is covering this important story as well. I know the Lame Stream Media wants to hide this scoop from the public, but that's just due to the fact that Hitler and Genocide gin up a lot of negativity in their focus groups.

Greenpeace Co-Founder: AOC's Green New Deal -- ‘Pompous Little Twit'
Breitbart?

Well that adds veracity.

View attachment 248668
Who skipped out 30+ years ago? What kinda relevance do you think he has now?
 
Patrick left Greenpeace in the mid 80's & makes money pedaling his bullshit to corporate interests.

Most of what I read that he said was based on ignorance of the NGD.

Like when he questioned how food would get to market as if there would be no trucks.

He has always been an AGW denier.


The New Green Deal would do any with the internal combustion engine in 10 years. We don't have any other way to get the food to market.

Electric
 
Patrick left Greenpeace in the mid 80's & makes money pedaling his bullshit to corporate interests.

Most of what I read that he said was based on ignorance of the NGD.

Like when he questioned how food would get to market as if there would be no trucks.

He has always been an AGW denier.


The New Green Deal would do any with the internal combustion engine in 10 years. We don't have any other way to get the food to market.

Electric


We don't have enough electric trucks for all of that hauling, and even more importantly, we don't have the electric power generation to fuel all those trucks even if they suddenly appeared.
 
It wasn't Breitbart, or WND, who came up with the Fake News story of Jussie Smollett's lynching. Or the Fake News about the Duke LaCrosse team, Tawana Brawley and Russian "collusion", for that matter.
Smollett came up with his own story, the Duke lacrosse team case was prosecutors and police violating proceedure, and Russian conspiracy (not "collusion") is not fake no matter how many times Cheeto Jesus says "witch Hunt".

Wing Nut Daily and Breitbart along with many other RWNJ "media" outlets are well known for making things up out of whole cloth just to keep their weak-minded patrons entertained.


Smollett did come up with his story, and the Lame Stream Media published it as "Fact" without checking it out. Ditto with the Duke case. As far as Russian collusion , Mueller has investigated this for YEARS and has come up with bupkis to verify any collusion between Trump and Uncle Pooty.
Both cases they got quotes from participants and police. What else do you expect them to do?

Tons of evidence of conspiracy with Russia.


I expect the media to actual INVESTIGATE the charges before crucifying the accused. Speak to witnesses, ask hard questions. Mr. Smollett was a known extremist, it was irresponsible to publish his attacks on Trump supporters as a "fact".
In both cases they did.

They were wrong, but they were not dishonest.

They were either dishonest or incompetent and in either case they are not credible. I suggest you find better news sources. Try the Drudge Report.
 
I expect the media to actual INVESTIGATE the charges before crucifying the accused. Speak to witnesses, ask hard questions. Mr. Smollett was a known extremist, it was irresponsible to publish his attacks on Trump supporters as a "fact".

Today news is entertainment adn the fake bullshit is more entertaining to libtarded Progs than Truth will ever be.
 
Patrick left Greenpeace in the mid 80's & makes money pedaling his bullshit to corporate interests.

Most of what I read that he said was based on ignorance of the NGD.

Like when he questioned how food would get to market as if there would be no trucks.

He has always been an AGW denier.


The New Green Deal would do any with the internal combustion engine in 10 years. We don't have any other way to get the food to market.

Electric


We don't have enough electric trucks for all of that hauling, and even more importantly, we don't have the electric power generation to fuel all those trucks even if they suddenly appeared.
You do realize that some manufacturers of vehicles have already set a time frame to go all electric.

You act like combustion vehicles will be taken off the road. What would happen is new trucks would be electric and the combustion would fade away as they age.
 
Skipped out? No, he saw the science being manipulated. He quit his own baby in protest.
Why not check with the Greenpeace co-founder then?

Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) on Twitter


From Wing Nut Daily so you know it has to be true.


Breitbart is covering this important story as well. I know the Lame Stream Media wants to hide this scoop from the public, but that's just due to the fact that Hitler and Genocide gin up a lot of negativity in their focus groups.

Greenpeace Co-Founder: AOC's Green New Deal -- ‘Pompous Little Twit'
Breitbart?

Well that adds veracity.

View attachment 248668
Who skipped out 30+ years ago? What kinda relevance do you think he has now?
Skipped out.
 
Smollett came up with his own story, the Duke lacrosse team case was prosecutors and police violating proceedure, and Russian conspiracy (not "collusion") is not fake no matter how many times Cheeto Jesus says "witch Hunt".

Wing Nut Daily and Breitbart along with many other RWNJ "media" outlets are well known for making things up out of whole cloth just to keep their weak-minded patrons entertained.


Smollett did come up with his story, and the Lame Stream Media published it as "Fact" without checking it out. Ditto with the Duke case. As far as Russian collusion , Mueller has investigated this for YEARS and has come up with bupkis to verify any collusion between Trump and Uncle Pooty.
Both cases they got quotes from participants and police. What else do you expect them to do?

Tons of evidence of conspiracy with Russia.


I expect the media to actual INVESTIGATE the charges before crucifying the accused. Speak to witnesses, ask hard questions. Mr. Smollett was a known extremist, it was irresponsible to publish his attacks on Trump supporters as a "fact".
In both cases they did.

They were wrong, but they were not dishonest.

They were either dishonest or incompetent and in either case they are not credible. I suggest you find better news sources. Try the Drudge Report.
Drudge report?!?!?!?!?!???

lshidmtamsfo-laughing-so-hard-i-dropped-my-taco-and-my-sombrero-fell-off.jpg
 
Smollett did come up with his story, and the Lame Stream Media published it as "Fact" without checking it out. Ditto with the Duke case. As far as Russian collusion , Mueller has investigated this for YEARS and has come up with bupkis to verify any collusion between Trump and Uncle Pooty.
Both cases they got quotes from participants and police. What else do you expect them to do?

Tons of evidence of conspiracy with Russia.


I expect the media to actual INVESTIGATE the charges before crucifying the accused. Speak to witnesses, ask hard questions. Mr. Smollett was a known extremist, it was irresponsible to publish his attacks on Trump supporters as a "fact".
In both cases they did.

They were wrong, but they were not dishonest.

They were either dishonest or incompetent and in either case they are not credible. I suggest you find better news sources. Try the Drudge Report.
Drudge report?!?!?!?!?!???

View attachment 248747

Yup. Drudge Report Passes New York Times in Web Traffic and Engagement in First Half of 2018
 

Forum List

Back
Top