Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I posted them,,,no its not,,,as I have proven endlessly todayThe word "theory" is in every science or biology text book. And it is, hands down, the best scientific explanation for the diversity of species. If you want to teach creationism, open a private school. Public schools are bound by the 1st amendment.
but that doesnt mean they can teach outright lies
They are not teaching outright lies.
Lucy? Taking a partial skeleton and using what we know of human & animal anatomy to determine it is a new hominid? Not a lie.
Nebraska Man? The scientists didn't make the lies, the media and writers did.
The Grand Canyon? That is hilarious.
No, they are not teaching lies.
SORRY LUCY IS AS MAKE BELIEVE AS FRED FLINTSTONE..,,,
and how did the media create nebraska man??? that was done by scientist
and I didnt say the grand canyon was a lie,,,just a wrong asumption
and what about the gil slits??? the man that claimed it admitted he made it up??? that is still taught
and if you watch the video there are several others backed up by proof
I posted them,,,no its not,,,as I have proven endlessly todayThe word "theory" is in every science or biology text book. And it is, hands down, the best scientific explanation for the diversity of species. If you want to teach creationism, open a private school. Public schools are bound by the 1st amendment.
but that doesnt mean they can teach outright lies
They are not teaching outright lies.
One thing you neglected to mention when you talked about Lucy. There have been other Australopithecus skeletons found. Enough that there is more than a complete skeleton. And it has shown that the original suppositions made by Donaldson were accurate. The skeletons found later were pretty much what he said they would be. And the fossilized footprints found (of several Australopithecus) showed they walked upright in a very human fashion.
other monkeys walk upright,,,doesnt mean they or lucy gave birth to a human
if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into oneI posted them,,,no its not,,,as I have proven endlessly today
but that doesnt mean they can teach outright lies
They are not teaching outright lies.
One thing you neglected to mention when you talked about Lucy. There have been other Australopithecus skeletons found. Enough that there is more than a complete skeleton. And it has shown that the original suppositions made by Donaldson were accurate. The skeletons found later were pretty much what he said they would be. And the fossilized footprints found (of several Australopithecus) showed they walked upright in a very human fashion.
other monkeys walk upright,,,doesnt mean they or lucy gave birth to a human
No one said Lucy gave birth to a human. She may be an ancestor. If you are going to pretend you know this topic, please get your facts straight. And while other apes walk upright, they do not walk like humans. And their footprints show this. The fossilized prints of ones like Lucy are not the footprints of monkeys.
You should read the rest of the Bible. There is plenty of walking on water, miraculous healing, and rising from the death. I never saw any of those in my life.Besides God, the only supernatural part is described in the Book of Genesis.
i'd bail if I were you too,,,not much of substance on your part and since you refuse the read or watch the proof I post whats the useI think the posts in this thread have shown who is delusional.
I will leave you to your silly ramblings.
Do you believe that Jesus was God? One third of a trinity?i'd bail if I were you too,,,not much of substance on your part and since you refuse the read or watch the proof I post whats the useI think the posts in this thread have shown who is delusional.
I will leave you to your silly ramblings.
you are the creator of your own ignorance
no theyre not as stated by the guy that first claimed itI posted them,,,no its not,,,as I have proven endlessly today
but that doesnt mean they can teach outright lies
They are not teaching outright lies.
Lucy? Taking a partial skeleton and using what we know of human & animal anatomy to determine it is a new hominid? Not a lie.
Nebraska Man? The scientists didn't make the lies, the media and writers did.
The Grand Canyon? That is hilarious.
No, they are not teaching lies.
SORRY LUCY IS AS MAKE BELIEVE AS FRED FLINTSTONE..,,,
and how did the media create nebraska man??? that was done by scientist
and I didnt say the grand canyon was a lie,,,just a wrong asumption
and what about the gil slits??? the man that claimed it admitted he made it up??? that is still taught
and if you watch the video there are several others backed up by proof
Pharyngeal slits (gill slits) develop on the embryo of every vertebrate. If you think they are gills, that is on you. But slits to develop on the embryos.
Lucy is still the first specimen of Australopithecus. Numerous others have been found.
The writer and an artist produced the articles and drawings. The scientists did not.
off topicDo you believe that Jesus was God? One third of a trinity?i'd bail if I were you too,,,not much of substance on your part and since you refuse the read or watch the proof I post whats the useI think the posts in this thread have shown who is delusional.
I will leave you to your silly ramblings.
you are the creator of your own ignorance
I posted them,,,no its not,,,as I have proven endlessly today
but that doesnt mean they can teach outright lies
They are not teaching outright lies.
Lucy? Taking a partial skeleton and using what we know of human & animal anatomy to determine it is a new hominid? Not a lie.
Nebraska Man? The scientists didn't make the lies, the media and writers did.
The Grand Canyon? That is hilarious.
No, they are not teaching lies.
SORRY LUCY IS AS MAKE BELIEVE AS FRED FLINTSTONE..,,,
and how did the media create nebraska man??? that was done by scientist
and I didnt say the grand canyon was a lie,,,just a wrong asumption
and what about the gil slits??? the man that claimed it admitted he made it up??? that is still taught
and if you watch the video there are several others backed up by proof
Pharyngeal slits (gill slits) develop on the embryo of every vertebrate. If you think they are gills, that is on you. But slits to develop on the embryos.
Lucy is still the first specimen of Australopithecus. Numerous others have been found.
The writer and an artist produced the articles and drawings. The scientists did not.
Not its spot on topic. You are trying to convince people that you are rational, not delusional, remember?off topicDo you believe that Jesus was God? One third of a trinity?i'd bail if I were you too,,,not much of substance on your part and since you refuse the read or watch the proof I post whats the useI think the posts in this thread have shown who is delusional.
I will leave you to your silly ramblings.
you are the creator of your own ignorance
No.if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into oneI posted them,,,They are not teaching outright lies.
One thing you neglected to mention when you talked about Lucy. There have been other Australopithecus skeletons found. Enough that there is more than a complete skeleton. And it has shown that the original suppositions made by Donaldson were accurate. The skeletons found later were pretty much what he said they would be. And the fossilized footprints found (of several Australopithecus) showed they walked upright in a very human fashion.
other monkeys walk upright,,,doesnt mean they or lucy gave birth to a human
No one said Lucy gave birth to a human. She may be an ancestor. If you are going to pretend you know this topic, please get your facts straight. And while other apes walk upright, they do not walk like humans. And their footprints show this. The fossilized prints of ones like Lucy are not the footprints of monkeys.
They wonder why we are obsessed with this subject. It’s fascinating you can lay it all out for them and they willfully continue to defend nonsense and even suggest they’re winning the debate. They just don’t want to get it.I think the posts in this thread have shown who is delusional.
I will leave you to your silly ramblings.
it took so long we cant even see it,,,No.if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into oneI posted them,,,
One thing you neglected to mention when you talked about Lucy. There have been other Australopithecus skeletons found. Enough that there is more than a complete skeleton. And it has shown that the original suppositions made by Donaldson were accurate. The skeletons found later were pretty much what he said they would be. And the fossilized footprints found (of several Australopithecus) showed they walked upright in a very human fashion.
other monkeys walk upright,,,doesnt mean they or lucy gave birth to a human
No one said Lucy gave birth to a human. She may be an ancestor. If you are going to pretend you know this topic, please get your facts straight. And while other apes walk upright, they do not walk like humans. And their footprints show this. The fossilized prints of ones like Lucy are not the footprints of monkeys.
Google there is no first human. Watch the explanation and report back that you grasp how long evolution takes to go from Lucy to modern day humans.
Let me ask you this. Do you truly believe in Adam and Eve? Then there kids had sex with each other? See your explanation is utter bullshit.
If anything you would say god pooped men and women plural into existence all at once. That would make much more sense. Instead you are forced to defend the undefendable.
NOOOO its about evolution and atheist,,,Not its spot on topic. You are trying to convince people that you are rational, not delusional, remember?off topicDo you believe that Jesus was God? One third of a trinity?i'd bail if I were you too,,,not much of substance on your part and since you refuse the read or watch the proof I post whats the useI think the posts in this thread have shown who is delusional.
I will leave you to your silly ramblings.
you are the creator of your own ignorance
That atheists are delusional? We are not.it took so long we cant even see it,,,No.if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into oneOne thing you neglected to mention when you talked about Lucy. There have been other Australopithecus skeletons found. Enough that there is more than a complete skeleton. And it has shown that the original suppositions made by Donaldson were accurate. The skeletons found later were pretty much what he said they would be. And the fossilized footprints found (of several Australopithecus) showed they walked upright in a very human fashion.
other monkeys walk upright,,,doesnt mean they or lucy gave birth to a human
No one said Lucy gave birth to a human. She may be an ancestor. If you are going to pretend you know this topic, please get your facts straight. And while other apes walk upright, they do not walk like humans. And their footprints show this. The fossilized prints of ones like Lucy are not the footprints of monkeys.
Google there is no first human. Watch the explanation and report back that you grasp how long evolution takes to go from Lucy to modern day humans.
Let me ask you this. Do you truly believe in Adam and Eve? Then there kids had sex with each other? See your explanation is utter bullshit.
If anything you would say god pooped men and women plural into existence all at once. That would make much more sense. Instead you are forced to defend the undefendable.
stay on topic
That atheists are delusional? We are not.it took so long we cant even see it,,,No.if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into oneother monkeys walk upright,,,doesnt mean they or lucy gave birth to a human
No one said Lucy gave birth to a human. She may be an ancestor. If you are going to pretend you know this topic, please get your facts straight. And while other apes walk upright, they do not walk like humans. And their footprints show this. The fossilized prints of ones like Lucy are not the footprints of monkeys.
Google there is no first human. Watch the explanation and report back that you grasp how long evolution takes to go from Lucy to modern day humans.
Let me ask you this. Do you truly believe in Adam and Eve? Then there kids had sex with each other? See your explanation is utter bullshit.
If anything you would say god pooped men and women plural into existence all at once. That would make much more sense. Instead you are forced to defend the undefendable.
stay on topic
Did you google and watch there is no first human? If you don’t get it let me know I’ll try to explain.
Let me blow your mind. Do you know you and a lizard have a common ancestor?
That atheists are delusional? We are not.it took so long we cant even see it,,,No.if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into oneNo one said Lucy gave birth to a human. She may be an ancestor. If you are going to pretend you know this topic, please get your facts straight. And while other apes walk upright, they do not walk like humans. And their footprints show this. The fossilized prints of ones like Lucy are not the footprints of monkeys.
Google there is no first human. Watch the explanation and report back that you grasp how long evolution takes to go from Lucy to modern day humans.
Let me ask you this. Do you truly believe in Adam and Eve? Then there kids had sex with each other? See your explanation is utter bullshit.
If anything you would say god pooped men and women plural into existence all at once. That would make much more sense. Instead you are forced to defend the undefendable.
stay on topic
Did you google and watch there is no first human? If you don’t get it let me know I’ll try to explain.
Let me blow your mind. Do you know you and a lizard have a common ancestor?
so all humans just appeared one day???
I dont think so,,and thats not what evolution teachs
Also not what I said. We evolved from a sub species before us. Barely distinguishable from modern human. Over hundreds of generations you barely know the differences but they are there.That atheists are delusional? We are not.it took so long we cant even see it,,,No.if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into oneNo one said Lucy gave birth to a human. She may be an ancestor. If you are going to pretend you know this topic, please get your facts straight. And while other apes walk upright, they do not walk like humans. And their footprints show this. The fossilized prints of ones like Lucy are not the footprints of monkeys.
Google there is no first human. Watch the explanation and report back that you grasp how long evolution takes to go from Lucy to modern day humans.
Let me ask you this. Do you truly believe in Adam and Eve? Then there kids had sex with each other? See your explanation is utter bullshit.
If anything you would say god pooped men and women plural into existence all at once. That would make much more sense. Instead you are forced to defend the undefendable.
stay on topic
Did you google and watch there is no first human? If you don’t get it let me know I’ll try to explain.
Let me blow your mind. Do you know you and a lizard have a common ancestor?
so all humans just appeared one day???
I dont think so,,and thats not what evolution teachs
if you'd check my sources you'd know thats not what I saidThat atheists are delusional? We are not.it took so long we cant even see it,,,No.if shes an ancestor at some point a monkey had to give birth to a human,,,or it magically turned into one
Google there is no first human. Watch the explanation and report back that you grasp how long evolution takes to go from Lucy to modern day humans.
Let me ask you this. Do you truly believe in Adam and Eve? Then there kids had sex with each other? See your explanation is utter bullshit.
If anything you would say god pooped men and women plural into existence all at once. That would make much more sense. Instead you are forced to defend the undefendable.
stay on topic
Did you google and watch there is no first human? If you don’t get it let me know I’ll try to explain.
Let me blow your mind. Do you know you and a lizard have a common ancestor?
so all humans just appeared one day???
I dont think so,,and thats not what evolution teachs
And you believe that 2 of every animal on earth was put on a boat that was 510 feet by 85 feet by 51 feet? Really?
There are an estimated 6.5 million species of land animals. So 13 million animals on a 510 foot boat? For 40 days?
That is clearly delusional.
