Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
who said he did???not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit uphow do you know they werent???
That is not an answer.
How do you know Lucy isn't an ancestor?
I can think of no way that an ancient man could get animals from South America and Australia on a boat built in the Middleeast.
your assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Close to land? But Noah had to walk all the way across the Atlantic. And that is more than a foot deep. More than 200 feet deep.
And as for your answer about walking to England because the channel is only 200 feet deep. That sounds so easy. But do you know how much water would have to be removed from the oceans to drop the water level 200 feet?
If all the ice in the Arctic, Antarctic, Greenland, and all the ice is n mountain tops were to melt, it would raise the ocean levels 200 feet. So you need to remove that much water to drop the levels 200 feet.
That is not an answer.
How do you know Lucy isn't an ancestor?
I can think of no way that an ancient man could get animals from South America and Australia on a boat built in the Middleeast.
your assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Yes, especially in the middle of the Atlantic.
But his answer is that Noah walked 7,000 miles to get 2 sloths, and then another 7,000 miles in the other direction to get kangaroo.
liar,,,I never said that
and arent you assuming they were in the middle east??? just like you assume Australia even existed as we know it
you assume a lot of things
and who even said the garden of eden was in the middle east??
Australia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
not all of itContinental shelf - Wikipediaso 100% of the ocean is thousands of ft deep and once you step in the water it falls straight down???See, this is what I am talking about. This troll is a fraud.not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep
what a dumbass
It is far more than 200 feet, and dropping the levels that much is impossible.
who said he did???not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit upThat is not an answer.
How do you know Lucy isn't an ancestor?
I can think of no way that an ancient man could get animals from South America and Australia on a boat built in the Middleeast.
your assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Close to land? But Noah had to walk all the way across the Atlantic. And that is more than a foot deep. More than 200 feet deep.
And as for your answer about walking to England because the channel is only 200 feet deep. That sounds so easy. But do you know how much water would have to be removed from the oceans to drop the water level 200 feet?
If all the ice in the Arctic, Antarctic, Greenland, and all the ice is n mountain tops were to melt, it would raise the ocean levels 200 feet. So you need to remove that much water to drop the levels 200 feet.
and how do you know that was the case back then??
another problem with your claim is that how much would the ocean level drop during the ice age when the ice went all the way down to missouri???
thats a hell of a lot more ice than exist today
again you assume a lot
your assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Yes, especially in the middle of the Atlantic.
But his answer is that Noah walked 7,000 miles to get 2 sloths, and then another 7,000 miles in the other direction to get kangaroo.
liar,,,I never said that
and arent you assuming they were in the middle east??? just like you assume Australia even existed as we know it
you assume a lot of things
and who even said the garden of eden was in the middle east??
Australia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
wheres your proof??
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Yes, especially in the middle of the Atlantic.
But his answer is that Noah walked 7,000 miles to get 2 sloths, and then another 7,000 miles in the other direction to get kangaroo.
liar,,,I never said that
and arent you assuming they were in the middle east??? just like you assume Australia even existed as we know it
you assume a lot of things
and who even said the garden of eden was in the middle east??
Australia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
wheres your proof??
Because the rate on continental drift is super slow.[/QUOT
so you have no proof,,,figures
Dude.who said he did???not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit upyour assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Close to land? But Noah had to walk all the way across the Atlantic. And that is more than a foot deep. More than 200 feet deep.
And as for your answer about walking to England because the channel is only 200 feet deep. That sounds so easy. But do you know how much water would have to be removed from the oceans to drop the water level 200 feet?
If all the ice in the Arctic, Antarctic, Greenland, and all the ice is n mountain tops were to melt, it would raise the ocean levels 200 feet. So you need to remove that much water to drop the levels 200 feet.
and how do you know that was the case back then??
another problem with your claim is that how much would the ocean level drop during the ice age when the ice went all the way down to missouri???
thats a hell of a lot more ice than exist today
again you assume a lot
And crossing the Atlantic Ocean would require a drop of far more than 200 feet. Far more than 500 feet.
I am making assumptions based on facts. There is nothing to indicate that the Atlantic was shallower by 1,000 feet.
who said he did???not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit upyour assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Close to land? But Noah had to walk all the way across the Atlantic. And that is more than a foot deep. More than 200 feet deep.
And as for your answer about walking to England because the channel is only 200 feet deep. That sounds so easy. But do you know how much water would have to be removed from the oceans to drop the water level 200 feet?
If all the ice in the Arctic, Antarctic, Greenland, and all the ice is n mountain tops were to melt, it would raise the ocean levels 200 feet. So you need to remove that much water to drop the levels 200 feet.
and how do you know that was the case back then??
another problem with your claim is that how much would the ocean level drop during the ice age when the ice went all the way down to missouri???
thats a hell of a lot more ice than exist today
again you assume a lot
And crossing the Atlantic Ocean would require a drop of far more than 200 feet. Far more than 500 feet.
I am making assumptions based on facts. There is nothing to indicate that the Atlantic was shallower by 1,000 feet.
not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit uphow do you know they werent???Yes it is. Find me an example of a science textbook that says fossils are formed when a dead animal lays on the surface for millions of years without rotting or being eaten. Find me one example of that, and I will apologize for calling you a liar. Until then, it is a lie.
But the fact still remains that our conversation yesterday involved us BOTH talking about fossils being formed by flooding. But you insisted that it was a the global flood which created the fossil graveyards. If at least 2 animals obviously survived without being on the Ark, then the global flood never happened. Localized flooding is a reasonable answer.
So is a landslide.
So is a volcanic eruption.
That is not an answer.
How do you know Lucy isn't an ancestor?
I can think of no way that an ancient man could get animals from South America and Australia on a boat built in the Middleeast.
your assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Yes, especially in the middle of the Atlantic.
But his answer is that Noah walked 7,000 miles to get 2 sloths, and then another 7,000 miles in the other direction to get kangaroo.
liar,,,I never said that
and arent you assuming they were in the middle east??? just like you assume Australia even existed as we know it
you assume a lot of things
and who even said the garden of eden was in the middle east??
Australia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
wheres your proof??
Because the rate on continental drift is super slow.
wheres your proof,,,and again arent you assuming it was the same back then before the floodYes, especially in the middle of the Atlantic.
But his answer is that Noah walked 7,000 miles to get 2 sloths, and then another 7,000 miles in the other direction to get kangaroo.
liar,,,I never said that
and arent you assuming they were in the middle east??? just like you assume Australia even existed as we know it
you assume a lot of things
and who even said the garden of eden was in the middle east??
Australia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
wheres your proof??
Because the rate on continental drift is super slow.
The Pacific plate moved at a rate of about 2 inches per year. Multiply that by 6,000 years, and you have 12,000 inches, or 1,000 feet. If Australia moved 1,000 feet, it would still be more or less where it is.
who said he did???not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit upThe ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Close to land? But Noah had to walk all the way across the Atlantic. And that is more than a foot deep. More than 200 feet deep.
And as for your answer about walking to England because the channel is only 200 feet deep. That sounds so easy. But do you know how much water would have to be removed from the oceans to drop the water level 200 feet?
If all the ice in the Arctic, Antarctic, Greenland, and all the ice is n mountain tops were to melt, it would raise the ocean levels 200 feet. So you need to remove that much water to drop the levels 200 feet.
and how do you know that was the case back then??
another problem with your claim is that how much would the ocean level drop during the ice age when the ice went all the way down to missouri???
thats a hell of a lot more ice than exist today
again you assume a lot
And crossing the Atlantic Ocean would require a drop of far more than 200 feet. Far more than 500 feet.
I am making assumptions based on facts. There is nothing to indicate that the Atlantic was shallower by 1,000 feet.
I wasnt talking about the atlantic,,,and australia isnt even in it
Continental shelf - Wikipediaso 100% of the ocean is thousands of ft deep and once you step in the water it falls straight down???See, this is what I am talking about. This troll is a fraud.not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep
what a dumbass
wheres your proof,,,and again arent you assuming it was the same back then before the floodliar,,,I never said that
and arent you assuming they were in the middle east??? just like you assume Australia even existed as we know it
you assume a lot of things
and who even said the garden of eden was in the middle east??
Australia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
wheres your proof??
Because the rate on continental drift is super slow.
The Pacific plate moved at a rate of about 2 inches per year. Multiply that by 6,000 years, and you have 12,000 inches, or 1,000 feet. If Australia moved 1,000 feet, it would still be more or less where it is.
not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit uphow do you know they werent???
That is not an answer.
How do you know Lucy isn't an ancestor?
I can think of no way that an ancient man could get animals from South America and Australia on a boat built in the Middleeast.
your assuming that there was always water between them,,as with the land bridge between russia and alaska it depends on the depth of the water,,,
the continents are not floating islands like pangea teaches but land mass connected by low lying lands filled with water between them
the english channel is at its lowest 200 ft, so drop the water that amount and you can walk from france to england
and if you look at underwater between the main continent and australia its the same thing,,,drop the water level a few hundred feet and they can walk there
The ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
The fact is, the ocean between continents is greater than 200 feet deep. You can invent all the absurd notions you wish to convince yourself of various absurd notions but those delusions convince no one.
Dude.who said he did???not all of it,,,and close to land its only a foot deep,,,now whos makin shit upThe ocean is much deeper than 200 feet. You're just making up this nonsense.
Close to land? But Noah had to walk all the way across the Atlantic. And that is more than a foot deep. More than 200 feet deep.
And as for your answer about walking to England because the channel is only 200 feet deep. That sounds so easy. But do you know how much water would have to be removed from the oceans to drop the water level 200 feet?
If all the ice in the Arctic, Antarctic, Greenland, and all the ice is n mountain tops were to melt, it would raise the ocean levels 200 feet. So you need to remove that much water to drop the levels 200 feet.
and how do you know that was the case back then??
another problem with your claim is that how much would the ocean level drop during the ice age when the ice went all the way down to missouri???
thats a hell of a lot more ice than exist today
again you assume a lot
And crossing the Atlantic Ocean would require a drop of far more than 200 feet. Far more than 500 feet.
I am making assumptions based on facts. There is nothing to indicate that the Atlantic was shallower by 1,000 feet.
He knows this.
He is eliciting responses. He enjoys watching others do the monkey dance for him. He says something obviously idiotic, then hopes other posters will feel compelled to spell out for him his obviously idiotic errors.
Then, he does it again.You'll see.
what claim??wheres your proof,,,and again arent you assuming it was the same back then before the floodAustralia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
wheres your proof??
Because the rate on continental drift is super slow.
The Pacific plate moved at a rate of about 2 inches per year. Multiply that by 6,000 years, and you have 12,000 inches, or 1,000 feet. If Australia moved 1,000 feet, it would still be more or less where it is.
There is no evidence that the rate of movement would change.
Do you have any proof of your claim?
and wheres your proof noah was in the middle east??wheres your proof,,,and again arent you assuming it was the same back then before the floodAustralia was where it is, more or less.
And Noah was in that region.
wheres your proof??
Because the rate on continental drift is super slow.
The Pacific plate moved at a rate of about 2 inches per year. Multiply that by 6,000 years, and you have 12,000 inches, or 1,000 feet. If Australia moved 1,000 feet, it would still be more or less where it is.
There is no evidence that the rate of movement would change.
Do you have any proof of your claim?
Oh, he might believe that nonsense. But he is still doing what I described.I think some of the ICR groupies really believe the nonsense they cut and paste.
