Are Democrats preparing for nuclear war with Russia?

Are Democrats planning a preemptive, full scale, nuclear strike against Russia this summer?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 11.8%
  • Probably Yes

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Maybe, maybe not

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Probably Not

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • No

    Votes: 12 70.6%

  • Total voters
    17

TheGreatSatan

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2019
14,557
18,635
2,320
Today WEF/Democrats are moving up forces they control to provoke Russia into full scale retaliation. These forces include long range missiles.

The people who denied Ukraine migs, now want this.

The people running America don't live here.

Democrats = WEF
 
A nuclear war with Russia will end the world as we know it. Just a quicker version of what the dims are already doing.
 
Today WEF/Democrats are moving up forces they control to provoke Russia into full scale retaliation. These forces include long range missiles.

The people who denied Ukraine migs, now want this.

The people running America don't live here.

Democrats = WEF
Watch out for your women and kids, democrats will be hiding behind them.
 
Today WEF/Democrats are moving up forces they control to provoke Russia into full scale retaliation. These forces include long range missiles.

The people who denied Ukraine migs, now want this.

The people running America don't live here.

Democrats = WEF
Phukk the goddamned Russians.

Phukk you, too, for spreading false alarmist bull$hit that the Russians use to justify their attempts at nuclear bullying.

Right, Tvaritch? :fu:
 
Today WEF/Democrats are moving up forces they control to provoke Russia into full scale retaliation. These forces include long range missiles.

The people who denied Ukraine migs, now want this.

The people running America don't live here.

Democrats = WEF
no ... Dems are to stupid to look that far ahead ... dems blunder into crisis because of their smug arrogance and lack of common sense .
 
A nuclear war with Russia will end the world as we know it. Just a quicker version of what the dims are already doing.

No, it wouldn't. It would change the world, but that's it. Most of Russias nuclear arsenal is old and non functional. They don't have Aegis like we do. It would end Russia, but we could easily survive. Russian defectors who were in charge of their arsenal in the 70's said even back then most of their junk was rusty and barely functional. They don't have the economy to keep up a huge arsenal like we do. So they built it, and then abandoned it.

Their ENTIRE military budget is equal to what we spend in MAINTENANCE on our equipment.


When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, a curious thing happened: Putin’s modern, lethal fighting force turned out to be a broken-down, two-bit shadow of its former self.​


Ukraine has used our decades old Patriot missile system to shoot down missiles from Russia that are considered hypersonic. That would mean our old stuff can still shoot down their newest stuff that MIGHT be deployable and functional.
 
Last edited:
They are too stupid to prepare for anything....

That right there.

The Democrat's stupidity and incompetence could very easily lead to a nuclear exchange, but they would be completely surprised and unprepared if it happened. It's a damned good thing the pandemic didn't happen under a Democrat President. We'd still be under a lockdown.
 
Today WEF/Democrats are moving up forces they control to provoke Russia into full scale retaliation. These forces include long range missiles.

The people who denied Ukraine migs, now want this.

The people running America don't live here.

Democrats = WEF
You are supposed to provide a link in your OP.
 
I remember when Reagan moved MX missiles into Europe, the limpwristed pinkos said he was going to start WWIII.

MAGA world are the direct descendants of those cowards, curled up on the floor in the fetal position.

Reagan understood the USSR was a paper tiger, just like Biden and NATO understand Putin is a paper tiger.

Reagan's motto was "Peace Through Strength".

MAGA World's motto is "Appease, appease, appease".
 
I remember when Reagan moved MX missiles into Europe, the limpwristed pinkos said he was going to start WWIII.

MAGA world are the direct descendants of those cowards, curled up on the floor in the fetal position.

Reagan understood the USSR was a paper tiger, just like Biden and NATO understand Putin is a paper tiger. Reagan's motto was "Peace Through Strength".

MAGA World's motto is "Appease, appease, appease"..
The satanic Democrat's motto is Peace Through Drag Shows.
 
No, it wouldn't. It would change the world, but that's it. Most of Russias nuclear arsenal is old and non functional. They don't have Aegis like we do. It would end Russia, but we could easily survive. Russian defectors who were in charge of their arsenal in the 70's said even back then most of their junk was rusty and barely functional. They don't have the economy to keep up a huge arsenal like we do. So they built it, and then abandoned it.

Their ENTIRE military budget is equal to what we spend in MAINTENANCE on our equipment.


When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, a curious thing happened: Putin’s modern, lethal fighting force turned out to be a broken-down, two-bit shadow of its former self.​


Ukraine has used our decades old Patriot missile system to shoot down missiles from Russia that are considered hypersonic. That would mean our old stuff can still shoot down their newest stuff that MIGHT be deployable and functional.
I stand by my statement, especially since I said “as we know it”. A nuclear conflict between superpowers would irradiate such large portions of the planet that the world, as we now know it, would end. The planet would survive, and humanity would most likely survive as well. Maybe “end” was a bit hyperbolic, but the changes would be so dramatic that it’s a distinction without a difference.
 

Forum List

Back
Top