are liberals are opposed to science as a basic principle?

Would poverty then be eliminated,

yes of course it would be eliminated. China is the perfect example. They switched to capitalism and instantly eliminated 40% of all the world's poverty.

Do you understand?
Should every Capitalist economy include a dose of Socialism, or should there be lassez faire Capitalism?

dear, if its a small dose it doesn't matter so who cares . If we had capitalist health care price would be 20% of what they are now and every American could have an extra $8000. China saved 60 million from slowly starving to death with a massive dose of captialism.

Still over your head?
 
Would poverty then be eliminated,

yes of course it would be eliminated. China is the perfect example. They switched to capitalism and instantly eliminated 40% of all the world's poverty.

Do you understand?
Should every Capitalist economy include a dose of Socialism, or should there be lassez faire Capitalism?

dear, if its a small dose it doesn't matter so who cares . If we had capitalist health care price would be 20% of what they are now and every American could have an extra $8000. China saved 60 million from slowly starving to death with a massive dose of captialism.

Still over your head?
I'm afraid it's the other way around.

If some Capitalism is good, more Capitalism is better, would lassez faire Capitalism be best?

Or does a modern society need a dose of Socialism?
 
would lassez faire Capitalism be best?

dear, China and East Germany just answered your question. The more capitalism the better.

Do you understand?
But the Capitalism practiced in China and the former East Germany is hardly laisssz faire!

So again I ask, do you believe that laisssz faire Capitalism would be the best form of Capitalism. Can you imagine living under that? What would be wrought by laisssz faire Capitalism?
 
But the Capitalism practiced in China

Is moving more and more toward capitalism with a much much smaller social safety net than we have so folks must work there and do which explains the 10% yearly growth. The more you increase the safety net with cancerous socialism the more the growth slows.

Do you understand now?
 
But the Capitalism practiced in China

Is moving more and more toward capitalism with a much much smaller social safety net than we have so folks must work there and do which explains the 10% yearly growth. The more you increase the safety net with cancerous socialism the more the growth slows.

Do you understand now?
I understand your disdain of Socialism. I'm curious if you have considered what life would be like under laissez faire Capitalism?
 
I'm curious if you have considered what life would be like under laissez faire Capitalism?

like in China with 10% a year growth and an end to poverty!!

Do you get it now?

If you think a dose of socialism is not a dose of cancer say exactly why or admit you lack the IQ to be here?
 
I'm curious if you have considered what life would be like under laissez faire Capitalism?

like in China with 10% a year growth and an end to poverty!!

Do you get it now?

If you think a dose of socialism is not a dose of cancer say exactly why or admit you lack the IQ to be here?
Do you understand what I mean by 'laissez faire'? Or does laissez faire Capitalism scare the snot out of you too?
 
I'm curious if you have considered what life would be like under laissez faire Capitalism?

like in China with 10% a year growth and an end to poverty!!

Do you get it now?

If you think a dose of socialism is not a dose of cancer say exactly why or admit you lack the IQ to be here?
Do you understand what I mean by 'laissez faire'? Or does laissez faire Capitalism scare the snot out of you too?

too stupid it means nothing since all economics systems have degrees of govt intervention.
 
I'm curious if you have considered what life would be like under laissez faire Capitalism?

like in China with 10% a year growth and an end to poverty!!

Do you get it now?

If you think a dose of socialism is not a dose of cancer say exactly why or admit you lack the IQ to be here?
Do you understand what I mean by 'laissez faire'? Or does laissez faire Capitalism scare the snot out of you too?

too stupid it means nothing since all economics systems have degrees of govt intervention.
Ahh! government intervention. Would this intervention, even as an unintended consequence, benefit particular institutions like banks and trading houses as well as wealthy individuals?
 

Forum List

Back
Top