Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #101
Why are you wrong? Oh where to begin...dimocrats will not vote for anyone but a piece of shit democrat, Democrats like me will vote for the person who actually moves the country forward, and not backward like the current occupant of the suit. Liberals are the epitome of regressive policy, they take away choice, and give the government the right to DICTATE what a person can have and his station in life by financial, and social control. That means the reinstatement of a RULING CLASS to choose each option for every citizen, and to force that person to accept that choice with the power of the government to enforce their decision. That is not open minded, and it is not freedom, it IS and always has been a socialist\communist\dictatorial ideal. The constitution has a "PREAMBLE" It states the reasons for it's existence. Read it, it gives a background for the things government should provide. Liberals expand the "Promote the General Welfare" clause, and ignore the "Secure the Blessings of Liberty" clause, and deny the Provide for the COMMON Defense" exists.
Another brainwashed member ^^^. As I understand the Preamble, to use 20th Century terms, it was and remains a vision and a mission statement for our nations leaders.
Let's parse the words and debate them:
If the reader disagrees, explain why and enlighten me!
- We the People (infers that our nation will be ruled by the will of the people by the vote);
- Of the United States (infers only citizens can vote);
- In order to form a more perfect union (sum reject the union for regionalism)
- Establish Justice, (objected by the Lock her up set, for one example);
- Insure Domestic Tranquility (infers one nation of diverse people treated with the same equity)
- Provide for the common defense, human being need to be defended from terrorists and disease;
- Promote the General Welfare, which suggests equal rights in law and equity
- Secure the blessing of liberty for all the people within the parameters of law and equity (equity being the quality of being fair and impartial;
- and our Posterity; (are kids and theirs).
For starters, the preamble is just that: a preamble. It did not dictate laws, structure of government, limitations, or anything else. It was just a quick introduction.
In addition, everything you said was "infers". There is no "infers" in law. The law is written in black and white and absolute. No inference allowed (because each side of a contractual agreement could and would have their own inferences).
Thanks so much for proving you ignorance once again.
- I wrote: "As I understand the Preamble, to use 20th Century terms, it was and remains a vision and a mission statement for our nations leaders.", now and into the future; nowhere did I write, It did not dictate laws, structure of government, limitations, or anything else. It was just a quick introduction.
- PROBATIVE, is something having a tendency to prove or establish something, that you can't debate and as did and offer general examples of the meaning of these terms, makes your ignorance appear to be of the not willful kind (yes, you my infer I find you to be - and I'm being nice here - not very bright.
- An inference is something that takes into account something not clearly stated, or sometimes clearly stated a I did in #2 above.