Are the anti-science zealots accepting anthropogenic climate change yet?

[schmidlap]

YOUR assertions of a Catastrophic sea level rise

Please cite where I described the inexorable rise in sea level as "Catastrophic."

Why did you ignore ReinyDays post 208?

I accept the overwhelming consensus of the world's climatologists, and recognize that their improved technological resources are continually improving their accuracy. See [Sea-level Forecasts: Watching Decades of Change in Real Time] (April 28, 2021)

Ideologues upset with the science like to cherry-pick the science, but cherry-picking data is grossly unscientific. Those who actually compile and analyze the data do not deal in self-serving, selective snippets.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Ideologues upset with the science like to cherry-pick the science, but cherry-picking data is grossly unscientific.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

 

[ding]

The resolution of the ideologues vs the climatologists squabble over who had a better grasp of climate was always silly.

View attachment 510995
​

View attachment 510997​

"I don’t know about you guys, but I think climate change is...​

'BULLSHIT!’ ​

...‘By the way, it is!"​

[Sen. Ron Johnson mouths to Republican luncheon that climate change is ‘bullsh—’]

​

Knowledge respects reality. Ignorance must have reality forced upon it. When ignorance is sustained by ideological dogma, it's a bitch to overcome, particularly in especially resistant cases.

The predictions are being validated. The theoretical is becoming blatant. The forecasts are being realized. Denial is becoming an increasingly costly ideological self-indulgence - agricultural failures, wildfires, flooding, soaring energy costs, droughts, mass starvation, relentless human migrations, etc., etc., etc.

By midcentury, if greenhouse gas emissions are not significantly curtailed, the coldest and warmest daily temperatures are expected to increase by at least 5 degrees F in most areas by mid-century rising to 10 degrees F by late century. The National Climate Assessment estimates 20-30 more days over 90 degrees F in most areas by mid-century. A recent study projects that the annual number of days with a heat index above 100 degrees F will double, and days with a heat index above 105 degrees F will triple, nationwide, when compared to the end of the 20th century.​

​

Extreme heat can increase the risk of other types of disasters. Heat can exacerbate drought, and hot dry conditions can in turn create wildfire conditions. In cities, buildings roads and infrastructure can be heated to 50 to 90 degrees hotter than the air while natural surfaces remain closer to air temperatures. The heat island effect is most intense during the day, but the slow release of heat from the infrastructure overnight (or an atmospheric heat island) can keep cities much hotter than surrounding areas. Rising temperatures across the country poses a threat to people, ecosystems and the economy...​

[Heat Waves and Climate Change | Center for Climate and Energy Solutions]​

​

An early summer heatwave across the western United States broke all-time records in multiple states, with temperatures above 100 degrees Fahrenheit for days on end in some places. This event marked yet another climate extreme for residents of a region already suffering through a devastating drought and with memories of last year’s horrific wildfire season likely still fresh on people’s minds.​

​

[Local, state leaders warn of climate change threat amid record heat wave]​

​

Truth not only endures. It has an irresistible way of imposing itself upon even the most willfully obtuse:

View attachment 511003​

Expect Americans to demand their elected representatives confront reality.

Some may be a bit slow, but eventually, everybody will get it, one way or another.

View attachment 511009
"If there is one thing that really burns my ass, it's
CLIMATE CHANGE!"


​

I have forgotten more science than you ever knew. The sky is not falling, Chicken Little.

 

[Sunsettommy]

The resolution of the ideologues vs the climatologists squabble over who had a better grasp of climate was always silly.

View attachment 510995
​

View attachment 510997​

"I don’t know about you guys, but I think climate change is...​

'BULLSHIT!’ ​

...‘By the way, it is!"​

[Sen. Ron Johnson mouths to Republican luncheon that climate change is ‘bullsh—’]

​

Knowledge respects reality. Ignorance must have reality forced upon it. When ignorance is sustained by ideological dogma, it's a bitch to overcome, particularly in especially resistant cases.

The predictions are being validated. The theoretical is becoming blatant. The forecasts are being realized. Denial is becoming an increasingly costly ideological self-indulgence - agricultural failures, wildfires, flooding, soaring energy costs, droughts, mass starvation, relentless human migrations, etc., etc., etc.

By midcentury, if greenhouse gas emissions are not significantly curtailed, the coldest and warmest daily temperatures are expected to increase by at least 5 degrees F in most areas by mid-century rising to 10 degrees F by late century. The National Climate Assessment estimates 20-30 more days over 90 degrees F in most areas by mid-century. A recent study projects that the annual number of days with a heat index above 100 degrees F will double, and days with a heat index above 105 degrees F will triple, nationwide, when compared to the end of the 20th century.​

​

Extreme heat can increase the risk of other types of disasters. Heat can exacerbate drought, and hot dry conditions can in turn create wildfire conditions. In cities, buildings roads and infrastructure can be heated to 50 to 90 degrees hotter than the air while natural surfaces remain closer to air temperatures. The heat island effect is most intense during the day, but the slow release of heat from the infrastructure overnight (or an atmospheric heat island) can keep cities much hotter than surrounding areas. Rising temperatures across the country poses a threat to people, ecosystems and the economy...​

[Heat Waves and Climate Change | Center for Climate and Energy Solutions]​

​

An early summer heatwave across the western United States broke all-time records in multiple states, with temperatures above 100 degrees Fahrenheit for days on end in some places. This event marked yet another climate extreme for residents of a region already suffering through a devastating drought and with memories of last year’s horrific wildfire season likely still fresh on people’s minds.​

​

[Local, state leaders warn of climate change threat amid record heat wave]​

​

Truth not only endures. It has an irresistible way of imposing itself upon even the most willfully obtuse:

View attachment 511003​

Expect Americans to demand their elected representatives confront reality.

Some may be a bit slow, but eventually, everybody will get it, one way or another.

View attachment 511009
"If there is one thing that really burns my ass, it's
CLIMATE CHANGE!"


​

I have forgotten more science than you ever knew. The sky is not falling, Chicken Little.

He keeps ignoring post 190, he keeps ignoring ReinyDays definitive post too, we are dealing with a "believer" in consensus and climate based political ideology. Evidence means nothing to him, he exemplifies why America is in trouble.

 

[schmidlap]

He keeps ignoring post 190, he keeps ignoring ReinyDays definitive post too, we are dealing with a "believer" in consensus and climate based political ideology. Evidence means nothing to him, he exemplifies why America is in trouble.

I reject the dogma of ideologues regarding anthropogenic climate change for the same reason every nation on earth (except for Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Libya,Eritrea, Yemen, and South Sudan if you wish to cite them) accept the consensus of every reputable scientific body on earth.

Climatologists are far more knowledgable concerning climatology than are ideologues, and the People have chosen climatologists over ideologues:

The biggest ever opinion poll on climate change has found two-thirds of people think it is a “global emergency”.​

​

The survey shows people across the world support climate action and gives politicians a clear mandate to take the major action needed, according to the UN organisation that carried out the poll.​

The UN Development Programme (UNDP) questioned 1.2 million people in 50 countries, many of them young.​

​

While younger people showed the greatest concern, with 69% of those aged 14-18 saying there is a climate emergency, 58% of those over 60 agreed, suggesting there is not a huge generational divide.​

​

Even when climate action required significant changes in their own country, majorities still backed the measures.​

​

In nations where fossil fuels are a major source of emissions, people strongly supported renewable energy, including the US (65% in favour), Australia (76%) and Russia (51%).​

​

The scientific data confirms that the earth is not flat, and spewing thousands of tonnes of industrial waste into the atmosphere into the atmosphere does impact the atmosphere, regardless of fringe denialists insisting otherwise.

Are there vast conspiracies by scientists to falsify the shape of the planet or its climatic data? Where's the evidence?

​

Anybody silly enough to fall for that one that would be eager to fantasize that the
Cry Baby Sore Loser, too morally feeble to face the truth, won the 2020 election in a "Landslide!"

 

[ding]

He keeps ignoring post 190, he keeps ignoring ReinyDays definitive post too, we are dealing with a "believer" in consensus and climate based political ideology. Evidence means nothing to him, he exemplifies why America is in trouble.

I reject the dogma of ideologues regarding anthropogenic climate change for the same reason every nation on earth (except for Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Libya,Eritrea, Yemen, and South Sudan if you wish to cite them) accept the consensus of every reputable scientific body on earth.

Climatologists are far more knowledgable concerning climatology than are ideologues, and the People have chosen climatologists over ideologues:

The biggest ever opinion poll on climate change has found two-thirds of people think it is a “global emergency”.​

​

The survey shows people across the world support climate action and gives politicians a clear mandate to take the major action needed, according to the UN organisation that carried out the poll.​

The UN Development Programme (UNDP) questioned 1.2 million people in 50 countries, many of them young.​

​

While younger people showed the greatest concern, with 69% of those aged 14-18 saying there is a climate emergency, 58% of those over 60 agreed, suggesting there is not a huge generational divide.​

​

Even when climate action required significant changes in their own country, majorities still backed the measures.​

​

In nations where fossil fuels are a major source of emissions, people strongly supported renewable energy, including the US (65% in favour), Australia (76%) and Russia (51%).​

​

The scientific data confirms that the earth is not flat, and spewing thousands of tonnes of industrial waste into the atmosphere into the atmosphere does impact the atmosphere, regardless of fringe denialists insisting otherwise.

Are there vast conspiracies by scientists to falsify the shape of the planet or its climatic data? Where's the evidence?

View attachment 512306​

Anybody silly enough to fall for that one that would be eager to fantasize that the
Cry Baby Sore Loser, too morally feeble to face the truth, won the 2020 election in a "Landslide!"

View attachment 512307
View attachment 512310

What's your background in science?

 

[schmidlap]

​

I have forgotten more science than you ever knew.

Don't be so modest. You have apparently forgotten more science that every reputable scientific academy, association, society, and organization on earth.

 

[ding]

​

I have forgotten more science than you ever knew.

Don't be so modest. You have apparently forgotten more science that every reputable scientific academy, association, society, and organization on earth.

Just more than you. Do you even have a college degree?

 

[schmidlap]

What's your background in science?

I have no expertise in cardiology, so in matters of cardiology, I respect the consensus of cardiologists.

If I were diagnosed with a serious heart problem, I would not rave that my cardiologist was being controlled by evil forces. I would consult other respected cardiologists, and if they were to corroborate his findings, I would not decide that the opinion of a failed casino operator would be superior.

 

[ding]

What's your background in science?

I have no expertise in cardiology, so in matters of cardiology, I respect the consensus of cardiologists.

If I were diagnosed with a serious heart problem, I would not rave that my cardiologist was being controlled by evil forces. I would consult other respected cardiologists, and if they were to corroborate his findings, I would not decide that the opinion of a failed casino operator would be superior.

Great. Then let me talk to the cardiologist because you don't know jack shit about the earth's climate.

 

[schmidlap]

Do you even have a college degree?

Yes, but neither of my degrees are in climatology, so, concerning climatology, I would follow your citation of academic credentials, and respect the consensus of PhD's in climatological disciplines, of course.

 

[ding]

​

Just more than you. Do you even have a college degree?

Yes, but neither of my degrees are in climatology, so, concerning climatology, I would follow your citation of academic credentials, and respect the consensus of PhD's in climatological disciplines, of course.

Then when one of those guys shows up we can have an intelligent discussion.

 

[Oddball]

What's your background in science?

I have no expertise in cardiology, so in matters of cardiology, I respect the consensus of cardiologists.

If I were diagnosed with a serious heart problem, I would not rave that my cardiologist was being controlled by evil forces. I would consult other respected cardiologists, and if they were to corroborate his findings, I would not decide that the opinion of a failed casino operator would be superior.

Non sequitur.

A cardiologist can explain to patients, in plain English, what's happening to them as it relates to their heart and show you the science behind it....And there's not a one of them who's afraid if the patient were to get a second opinion.

Goebbels warming "scientists" can't do that, because they don't have any reproducible, quantifiable, and falsifiable science....Only vague and bewildering models, that have never ever been predictive....And if you point out these things you get shouted down as a DENIER!

You definitely fall into the group that has been baffled with bullshit.

 

[Oddball]

Do you even have a college degree?

Yes, but neither of my degrees are in climatology, so, concerning climatology, I would follow your citation of academic credentials, and respect the consensus of PhD's in climatological disciplines, of course.

Appeal to authority is still appeal to authority.

 

[ding]

The science is settled. No need to ever do science again.

 

[ding]

Dammit, the earth is flat... The science is settled.

 

[Oddball]

Dammit, the earth is flat... The science is settled.

Only birds can fly...THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!

 

[ding]

What the fuck do you mean that time is relative. You are just a patent clerk.

 

[Oddball]

The Black Plague is caused by demons...THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!

 

[ding]

If the solid booster rocket o-rings ever see heat the shuttles are grounded. ~NASA

(solid booster rockets see heat)

Let's do some tests to see if damaged o-rings still hold pressure. ~NASA

The o-rings held. We are good to go. ~NASA