Are the Democrats happy so much damage was done to Metropolitan areas?

[RandomPoster]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

 

[LuckyDuck]

Yes indeed. They are very happy with the chaos in their cities. Remember....divide and conquer. It's right out of the Communist playbook.

 

[White 6]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

 

[RandomPoster]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

 

[White 6]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

 

[Norman]

Next they will cry how poor they are compared to the rest, because they destroyed what they had.

No aid should be sent to their area. They got what they voted for.

 

[Moonglow]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Just the Democrats in the restoration construction industry...

 

[lantern2814]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Try to stop lying. The idiot in Atlanta attacked the cops and pointed a weapon at them. He was not killed sleeping in his car liar. Try listening to and cooperating with the cop. Or quit breaking the law. Is that too much to to ask ? For you and yours apparently it is.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Wait...did you just claim the cops shot him while he was in line at Wendy's?

 

[RandomPoster]

Next they will cry how poor they are compared to the rest, because they destroyed what they had.

No aid should be sent to their area. They got what they voted for.

I don't think most of the people doing the rioting are business owners or home owners. Most are a mixture of hoodlums and frat boys who left their parent's basements in the suburbs. The people most hurt are the residents of those areas who are working hard and building something of their own. The Democrats don't like seeing them succeed because it destroys the narrative that the residents of those communities don't have a chance.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

The Democratic leadership in all districts uses black lives matter as their version of the Red Guard. That's why they allow the riots.

 

[White 6]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Try to stop lying. The idiot in Atlanta attacked the cops and pointed a weapon at them. He was not killed sleeping in his car liar. Try listening to and cooperating with the cop. Or quit breaking the law. Is that too much to to ask ? For you and yours apparently it is.

It was their "NON-Leathal Taser. If they were shooting him as a fleeing felon running away with a $1,200 to $2,000 piece of equipment as the excuse, I might understand, maybe. If you tell me he was pointing a weapon, and it is a device you tell me is non-leathal and you shoot him running away from you, Thats Bull$hit. I cannot shoot unless I am in imminent mortal fear for my life or someone else's life in Tennessee. You want to tell the law is different 1 state away from me, SHOW ME. You want to tell me the cops there have special permission for use of deadly force in that situation, SHOW ME the municipal or state code authorizing or at least the S.O.P. of the police department. Don't tell me they do not have their procedure written down, updated annually and signed off on. I use to write S.O.P.s and they aren't something you dust off every 10 years when you get a new piece of equipment. They are probably signed off again or updated and signed of annually. What is with you people, anyway? Not every time somebody disagrees with you makes them a liar. You guy pitch that around pretty loose. Is that how you were raised or just how right-wing trump boys are on the internet?

 

[White 6]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Wait...did you just claim the cops shot him while he was in line at Wendy's?

Nope. I claimed the guy in Atlanta fell asleep in his car in the drive through lane at Wendy's, cops were called, they woke him up, talked to him for close to 40 minutes both sides calm, tried to place him under arrest, he took one of the cops tasers away from him when they jumped him, ran, turned fired the taser, turned, tried to run away again and the cop shot him in the back. Again, if running away with a non-leathal weapon, not justified on imminent threat to life and I am just not sure if a cop can shoot for grand theft. I know I can't. Did you have another question or did you just think a cop was authorized to shoot for non-compliance and resisting arrest?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Is getting in the police car after you have broken the law and facing a judge elected by the people so much to ask?

 

[otto105]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

What cities are you referring too?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Wait...did you just claim the cops shot him while he was in line at Wendy's?

Nope. I claimed the guy in Atlanta fell asleep in his car in the drive through lane at Wendy's, cops were called, they woke him up, talked to him for close to 40 minutes both sides calm, tried to place him under arrest, he took one of the cops tasers away from him when they jumped him, ran, turned fired the taser, turned, tried to run away again and the cop shot him in the back. Again, if running away with a non-leathal weapon, not justified on imminent threat to life and I am just not sure if a cop can shoot for grand theft. I know I can't. Did you have another question or did you just think a cop was authorized to shoot for non-compliance and resisting arrest?

Guess he shouldnt have gotten violent.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Wait...did you just claim the cops shot him while he was in line at Wendy's?

Nope. I claimed the guy in Atlanta fell asleep in his car in the drive through lane at Wendy's, cops were called, they woke him up, talked to him for close to 40 minutes both sides calm, tried to place him under arrest, he took one of the cops tasers away from him when they jumped him, ran, turned fired the taser, turned, tried to run away again and the cop shot him in the back. Again, if running away with a non-leathal weapon, not justified on imminent threat to life and I am just not sure if a cop can shoot for grand theft. I know I can't. Did you have another question or did you just think a cop was authorized to shoot for non-compliance and resisting arrest?

The state of Georgia considers a taser a lethal weapon. Now go ahead and spin something else with your feeeelllllinnnggggs and no facts.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

The Democrat party is a domestic terrorist group. They hide hurricane relief from hurricane victims, spread a virus to nursing homes to kill old people, and riot, all to hurt America and trump.

Bad news for America is good news for Democrats.

Democrats even want similar lockdowns for the climate emergency they want to declare to further punish Americans.

 

[White 6]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Is getting in the police car after you have broken the law and facing a judge elected by the people so much to ask?

Unusually not. Have very limited experience personally except for a party at some sand pits out in the middle of nowhere. Cop came tearing down the road. Jumped out with shotguns. Told everybody to freeze. Those further away ran like hell, cops shooting shotguns over their heads as the rounded people up. Got told to get in the car (no handcuffs) back in 74. I did. Then got asked to give keys to my new van, so they could haul prisoners to jail across the county line. I refused. They left me and my girlfriend (now my wife) in the car. Turned around and they had broken out one of my windows, got in and found spare key in glove compartment. Loaded it plum full of young adults, male and female. Drove everybody several miles across the county line to jail. After 3 hours processing and questioning 73 of us, let me go with no charges. Saw van with broken driver side window, one of my huge speakers torn off, floor mount broken on new Craig PowerPlay Quadraphonic 8 track player. Went back in to ask who was going to pay for damage. Was told I should not have been to that party at sand pits (in my home county) and I better forget it and get the hell out of there before they locked me up until Monday. Dad and mom came home on Sunday. Dad check in with Federal judge at home on Sunday night in another state (Kentucky). Had me go back on Monday with my older brother (to make sure I minded my manners) to ask if they would make the repairs. The Sherriff said "Hell no, boy. You are under arrest, I'll think up charges this afternoon. I said OK, but could I or my brother make one phone call to let know where we are. He let me. I call the number dad gave me to the Judges office in the Fedeal courthouse in Paducah. Judge asked to speak to the Tennessee Sheriff and explained that a Federal warrant would be issued for the Sherriff's arrest on a slew of charges if he wanted to proceed down that road and then the Sheriff was responding politely to the Federal judge and it was all settled politely and my property was returned to perfect condition and I did not have to go to jail, but was told by the Sheriff, "Don't ever come back to Benton County." Sounded like sage reasonable advice. I didn't for several years. By that time, Sheriff was under Federal indictment by another judge for mail fraud, bribery, extortion, conspiracy involved with illegal liqueur sales and other charges. BLM would call my experience white privilege. I've just thought of it as justice in America growing up in rural Kentucky and Tennessee from a good family, not rich, just known and respected for being normal folk in our communities.

 

[White 6]

A convenient effect of the riots from a leftist point of view is to destroy the economy in Metropolitan areas. In particular, a major point that Trump liked to stress was the historically low unemployment rate of black Americans. If the Democrats can destroy the businesses in inner city neighborhoods, they can prevent the people that live in those communities from getting back to work and blame Trump for the rise in unemployment in those areas.

Other cities such as Detroit and Baltimore have been affected for years after the destruction of riots.

Are you saying ordinarily authoritarian police (a basically right wing stance) and law enforcement in general are intentionally trying to get democrats elected by continuing to act in an authoritarian right wing manner spurring protests and riots? That does not make sense. If that is the case, would it not be easier to force the police to not act outside the law, (since there are far fewer police than democrat protester) rather than support crack downs, since the police make their money to do their job and there does not appear to be a financial carrot to dangle in front of the democrats and protesters to entice them to go along with being beaten down under police subjugation of the state?

No. I am saying the Democratic leadership in Metropolitan areas are allowing the riots to run full scale and the MSM is fueling the flames.

I watched the news Sunday and today. Did violent riots kick up again and I missed it or are you posting about the rioting that occurred mostly the first week after the cops killed Floyd? I did see the riot after the cop killed the guy sleeping in his car at the drive through of Wendy's. Maybe if the cops would quit killing people, people might not protest and it become a riot. Is that really so much to ask?

Wait...did you just claim the cops shot him while he was in line at Wendy's?

Nope. I claimed the guy in Atlanta fell asleep in his car in the drive through lane at Wendy's, cops were called, they woke him up, talked to him for close to 40 minutes both sides calm, tried to place him under arrest, he took one of the cops tasers away from him when they jumped him, ran, turned fired the taser, turned, tried to run away again and the cop shot him in the back. Again, if running away with a non-leathal weapon, not justified on imminent threat to life and I am just not sure if a cop can shoot for grand theft. I know I can't. Did you have another question or did you just think a cop was authorized to shoot for non-compliance and resisting arrest?

Guess he shouldnt have gotten violent.

That running with your back to a cop if a very violent act. It's not as if he couldn't be picked up as they knew exactly who he was after talking and looking at his license for 40 minutes and they did have his car. Sounds like he put one in him to teach a lesson. Probably why he got fired. Apparently he did not have the support of law enforcement this time. Won't bring the dead guy back to life though.