Are there any 'Centrists' here?????? ANYONE?????

[saveliberty]

You trying to avoid linking to the actual text?

WHY?

Gee, look if you click on the text, it gets bigger. So big in fact, even those blind to truth SHOULD be able to read it.

 

[Truthmatters]

Its trash as evidence.

 

[saveliberty]

I cant find ANY information on that old newspaper or the Mr Morrison who owned the paper and wrote the piece

Your google truth function is broken.

 

[Truthmatters]

some one no one nows about and a paper that is unknown wrote something and put it in print.


That does not rise to the level of an SEC report or the actaul historical tax rates.


this is part of your pathology

 

[saveliberty]

Its trash as evidence.

Funny you call a liberal source trash, but go with it.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Now Fatmatters thinks there should be Google links to newspaper articles from 1937.

 

[Truthmatters]

Albert marion Morrison?

 

[Pogo]

Yes. I kind of like the term "radical centrist". Not only am I not a member of a political party, I'd like to see all political parties abolished.

I'm staunchly anti-label in political rhetoric; I think they and political parties are two flavours of the same poison.

Good topic idea. Looking forward to more.

 

[Truthmatters]

Its trash as evidence.

Funny you call a liberal source trash, but go with it.

The Bush SEC?


the historical tax record?

 

[Truthmatters]

Yes. I kind of like the term "radical centrist". Not only am I not a member of a political party, I'd like to see all political parties abolished.

I'm staunchly anti-label in political rhetoric; I think they and political parties are two flavours of the same poison.

Good topic idea. Looking forward to more.

The two party system is fine when both use facts

 

[Truthmatters]

Now Fatmatters thinks there should be Google links to newspaper articles from 1937.

If they have any validity there are links.

thank you for agreeing his link is trash

 

[saveliberty]

some one no one nows about and a paper that is unknown wrote something and put it in print.


That does not rise to the level of an SEC report or the actaul historical tax rates.


this is part of your pathology

I assure you, I'm not dead. Even you should "now" that.

You keep switching from effective to historical tax rates. Why is that?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Now Fatmatters thinks there should be Google links to newspaper articles from 1937.

If they have any validity there are links.

thank you for agreeing his link is trash

How could there be links when there was NO internet in 1937?

Be specific.

 

[saveliberty]

All I see from TDM's posts today is reducing loopholes and deductions is clearly the more effective policy choice. That is what the Republicans supported. Thanks TDM.

 

[saveliberty]

Now Fatmatters thinks there should be Google links to newspaper articles from 1937.

If they have any validity there are links.

thank you for agreeing his link is trash

How could there be links when there was NO internet in 1937?

Be specific.

Better yet, prove their wasn't an internet in 1937.

 

[Truthmatters]

how it it there are links to the NY times in 1937?


if your info is NOT trustable dont blame me

 

[Truthmatters]

All I see from TDM's posts today is reducing loopholes and deductions is clearly the more effective policy choice. That is what the Republicans supported. Thanks TDM.

that is what you have always seen no matter what the facts say.

 

[Truthmatters]

this is why the republican party will never win another national election until it kicks these nutters to the curb and shows glee in doing so

 

[saveliberty]

All I see from TDM's posts today is reducing loopholes and deductions is clearly the more effective policy choice. That is what the Republicans supported. Thanks TDM.

that is what you have always seen no matter what the facts say.

What facts?

 

[saveliberty]

how it it there are links to the NY times in 1937?

if your info is NOT trustable dont blame me

Because they like to spread their opinions around?