Are we more likely to be killed by an illegal/anchor baby or an AR-15?

[BrokeLoser]

Since Democrats seem to be super concerned about AR-15’s I can’t help but wonder why they wouldn’t be concerned about growing a murderous population among us?
Have Mexicrats even considered this?
Do they realize why nobody sane can take them serious?

 

[DGS49]

If you want to make a point, you ought to avoid looking like an idiot in your headline. An Anchor Baby is, by definition, a U.S. citizen (i.e., "legal"). There is no such thing as an "illegal/anchor baby."

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

More concerned about getting killed by a drunk-driving redneck...certainly the odds are greater.

 

[BrokeLoser]

If you want to make a point, you ought to avoid looking like an idiot in your headline. An Anchor Baby is, by definition, a U.S. citizen (i.e., "legal"). There is no such thing as an "illegal/anchor baby."

Sane people working with an iQ know that a foward slash placed between two words replaces the word ‘or’. You OldLady and EvilEyeFleegle all need to pull your heads from your asses. Further, while anchor babies may be a US Citizens...they are citizens by way of federal criminality and illegal means.
If elected politicians were doing their fucking jobs neither the illegal or the anchor baby would be here killing Americans. Get it now Gustavo? See the point?

 

[BrokeLoser]

More concerned about getting killed by a drunk-driving redneck...certainly the odds are greater.

That may be true in Potato Land...you have lots of filthy white trash...Wetbacks hate cold climates. Consider yourself lucky.