Arizona Judge Rejects Kari Lake’s Effort to Overturn Her Election Loss

Did you even follow the presentation of the evidence? If you did, give us a quick summary.

Several AZ LAWS were obviously broken and even the witness for the state admitted it. There is a law, for example, that there MUST BE a verifiable chain of custody when moving ballots from polling places to a central location for tabulation. No such evidence was available to prove that law was complied with and their witness admitted it. BY LAW, every damned one of those 250 thousand ballots should have been disqualified.

There was proof that someone in the crew running the elections intentionally misprinted ballots so they could not be scanned. That change HAD to be done by a system administrator. Security would not have otherwise allowed it. Also, there was proof that this change was executed on the day of the election. Finally, the most important part of this is the fact that you fu*king people would be in the streets burning shit down if this behavior cost YOUR candidate a victory.
Don't be surprised when the rest of us finally decide to mimic you. Apparently, that's the only way to convince SCOTUS to take elections seriously again...

You aren't going to do squat. Again, we saw those charged for 1/6 one after one cry in court and say they understood what they did was wrong.
 
Did you even follow the presentation of the evidence? If you did, give us a quick summary.

Several AZ LAWS were obviously broken and even the witness for the state admitted it. There is a law, for example, that there MUST BE a verifiable chain of custody when moving ballots from polling places to a central location for tabulation. No such evidence was available to prove that law was complied with and their witness admitted it. BY LAW, every damned one of those 250 thousand ballots should have been disqualified.

There was proof that someone in the crew running the elections intentionally misprinted ballots so they could not be scanned. That change HAD to be done by a system administrator. Security would not have otherwise allowed it. Also, there was proof that this change was executed on the day of the election. Finally, the most important part of this is the fact that you fu*king people would be in the streets burning shit down if this behavior cost YOUR candidate a victory.
Don't be surprised when the rest of us finally decide to mimic you. Apparently, that's the only way to convince SCOTUS to take elections seriously again...
All but three people had their ballots cast when they corrected the mistake.
 
I do not think it is over by a long shot.

200w.webp
 

Another one bites the dust. These MAGA election deniers are finding that their lies are not fooling the justice system. Soon they will be relegated to the Dust Bin of History. What a bunch of Idiots.

Good. Enough of these crazies.
 
And you wonder why the nation is destroyed, it's judicial system dead and the end of honest elections.
 
Apparently, the judge set the bar fairly high as to what the precise issues would be. And ultimately, the judge determined that the plaintiff had failed to meet that burden of proof, citing it as being mostly just speculative.

In reality, the ruling doesn’t surprise almost anyone. Right or wrong, it was fully expected.

Apparently the judge in the rules of evidentiary procedures.

A judge on Saturday dismissed Republican Kari Lake’s election challenge and affirmed Democrat Katie Hobbs’ election as governor two days after a trial in which he said Lake failed to prove her case.


Maricopa County Judge Peter Thompson, who oversaw the two-day trial, ruled that Lake’s legal team never offered clear and convincing evidence showing the election was rigged against her.

Lake can appeal the case before Hobbs is expected to be sworn into office Jan. 2. Because of the tight timetable, the case may move swiftly to the Arizona Supreme Court.

Thompson noted that real problems did affect the election, but election workers tried their best and performed their role "with integrity."

"Not perfectly,” Thompson continued, "as no system on this earth is perfect, but more than sufficient to comply with the law and conduct a valid election."

Judge Thompson found no "Convincing Evidence showing the election was rigged against her" (Lake). In order to sustain a charge of Election Fraud/Voter Fraud, you must evidence beyond a reasonable doubt of Election Fraud/Voter Fraud. Lake had nothing unbelievable conspiracy theories including shruken ballots caused her to lose the election.
 
Last edited:
As everyone except for usmb conservatives expected, lack of evidence was cited. Why do Republicans always lose these kinds of lawsuits? Yes. It was a rhetorical question.

And once again demonstrating the utility of using Gateway Pundit as your primary lens to view reality and predict actual legal outcomes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top