Arizona Long Voting Lines: Supreme Court Gutted Voting Right Act

worry over the state you live in and keep your nose out of other people business
 
worry over the state you live in and keep your nose out of other people business

Prior to the Supreme Court gutting the Voting Rights Act in 2013 - the U.S. Justice Department would not have allowed Arizona to engage in such voter suppression tactics.
 
Exactly what part of the voting rights act would have prevented the long lines?
 
Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.

Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.

Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.

There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
 
Last edited:
Exactly what part of the voting rights act would have prevented the long lines?

The part that eliminated U.S. Dept. of Justice approval/oversight prior to engaging in voter suppression (i.e. reducing number of polling locations).
 
Last edited:
Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.

Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.

Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.

There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
You are the biggest dumbshit on here.
So it is not "Arizona" but one county in AZ. It is not voter suppression when polls experience an overflow of voters.
Your worthless post is spat on and ignored.
 
Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.

Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.

Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.

There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
You are the biggest dumbshit on here.
So it is not "Arizona" but one county in AZ. It is not voter suppression when polls experience an overflow of voters.
Your worthless post is spat on and ignored.
if polls are intentionally reduced to cause long lines making voting more difficult in certain areas it is in fact voter suppression
 
Or is it the large voter turn out?people wait longer than that to storm walmart


Just a question---------> If the intent was to suppress with long lines, exactly how did they know who they were suppressing? Not only that, but since it is a closed primary with no crossover allowed, exactly how did this affect Democrats more than the GOP?
 
Another bullshit thread brought to you by the king/queen/it of bullshit threads.

Maybe if Trump wins the bullshit artist known as Lakota will move out of the country.

We can only hope.
 
I didn't think that the majority of the democrat party bothered voting in the Primaries. Hell the DNC has a hard time programming them to vote in the mid-terms.
 
Or is it the large voter turn out?people wait longer than that to storm walmart


Just a question---------> If the intent was to suppress with long lines, exactly how did they know who they were suppressing? Not only that, but since it is a closed primary with no crossover allowed, exactly how did this affect Democrats more than the GOP?
I can tell you didn't vote in Maricopa County, AZ yesterday. With only 60 polling places in a county with ~21,000 to vote in each of the 1.25 million registered voters in the county, it was just a bit CROWDED where we voted. It was early, but we still had over an hour wait. When we came out the line had about doubled. If the Auditor, et al, pull the same shit for the General election in November, it will definitely impact the turnout.

I heard on the news last night that some polling places closer in toward Phoenix proper had 5 + hour wait times. This never would have happened if SCOTUS hadn't have red lined Section V of the Voting Rights Act. It would have brought the DOJ down on the State given this was a specific tactic use in the Tom Crow era to curb voting by "undesirables". Arizona got tagged for this same shit back in the '70's, so they know how it works.
 
Or is it the large voter turn out?people wait longer than that to storm walmart


Just a question---------> If the intent was to suppress with long lines, exactly how did they know who they were suppressing? Not only that, but since it is a closed primary with no crossover allowed, exactly how did this affect Democrats more than the GOP?
I can tell you didn't vote in Maricopa County, AZ yesterday. With only 60 polling places in a county with ~21,000 to vote in each of the 1.25 million registered voters in the county, it was just a bit CROWDED where we voted. It was early, but we still had over an hour wait. When we came out the line had about doubled. If the Auditor, et al, pull the same shit for the General election in November, it will definitely impact the turnout.

I heard on the news last night that some polling places closer in toward Phoenix proper had 5 + hour wait times. This never would have happened if SCOTUS hadn't have red lined Section V of the Voting Rights Act. It would have brought the DOJ down on the State given this was a specific tactic use in the Tom Crow era to curb voting by "undesirables". Arizona got tagged for this same shit back in the '70's, so they know how it works.

So then, somehow the undesirables had to wait in line longer than the desirable people. Explain how that is enforced.
 
Exactly what part of the voting rights act would have prevented the long lines?

The part that eliminated U.S. Dept. of Justice approval/oversight prior to engaging in voter suppression (i.e. reducing number of polling locations).

So voter suppression is okay if the federal government agrees with it?

Are you really that dense? The role of the U.S. Dept. of Justice was to prevent voter suppression - until the Voting Rights Act was gutted by the Conservative Supreme Court.
 

Forum List

Back
Top