Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?This is what happens when a Conservative Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act.
Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act - The New York Times
There Were 5-Hour Lines to Vote in Arizona Because the Supreme Court Gutted the Voting Rights Act
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.
Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.
There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
No, it's because Republicans hate blacks and Hispanics and want to disenfranchise them. And Bush lied us into war with Iraq. Get it right!Yeah, that's it. That's just what they did in the deep South when Jim Crow was the Auditor down there 'cause that's how they got the "undesirables" to not vote with those longggggggg lines. Why Hell, your just as sharp as a bad B&W picture tube on a 1954 Admiral 17" console TV, lad!I can tell you didn't vote in Maricopa County, AZ yesterday. With only 60 polling places in a county with ~21,000 to vote in each of the 1.25 million registered voters in the county, it was just a bit CROWDED where we voted. It was early, but we still had over an hour wait. When we came out the line had about doubled. If the Auditor, et al, pull the same shit for the General election in November, it will definitely impact the turnout.Or is it the large voter turn out?people wait longer than that to storm walmart
Just a question---------> If the intent was to suppress with long lines, exactly how did they know who they were suppressing? Not only that, but since it is a closed primary with no crossover allowed, exactly how did this affect Democrats more than the GOP?
I heard on the news last night that some polling places closer in toward Phoenix proper had 5 + hour wait times. This never would have happened if SCOTUS hadn't have red lined Section V of the Voting Rights Act. It would have brought the DOJ down on the State given this was a specific tactic use in the Tom Crow era to curb voting by "undesirables". Arizona got tagged for this same shit back in the '70's, so they know how it works.
So then, somehow the undesirables had to wait in line longer than the desirable people. Explain how that is enforced.
Going from over 200 polling places in 2012 down to 60 today (after SCOTUS hacked away at Section V of the VRA in 2013) with the shitty public transportation here in this very, very large County is going to work hardships on folks with limited transport options, and that's just one issue. Must be too fucking hard for you to comprehend, coming from Inbreed, Indiana.
I guess you have an issue with enabling every ELIGIBLE voter to exercise their franchise without gov'mint obstruction!
It had nothing to do with the Supreme Courts ruling.
It had everything to do with the Maricopa County elections officials who made the decision.
This is their decision and theirs alone. No one else.
Purcell said it was because they did not have the money.
Maricopa County elections officials reduced polling places to 60 to save money - Cronkite News - Arizona PBS
Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?This is what happens when a Conservative Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act.
Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act - The New York Times
There Were 5-Hour Lines to Vote in Arizona Because the Supreme Court Gutted the Voting Rights Act
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.
Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.
There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
What is the maximum time to vote, jerkface?Anybody who thinks waiting 5 hours to vote is okay...is a fucked up asshole.
Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?This is what happens when a Conservative Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act.
Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act - The New York Times
There Were 5-Hour Lines to Vote in Arizona Because the Supreme Court Gutted the Voting Rights Act
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.
Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.
There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
What is the maximum time to vote, jerkface?Anybody who thinks waiting 5 hours to vote is okay...is a fucked up asshole.
So if anyone could request a ballot by mail wtf are you griping about?Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?This is what happens when a Conservative Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act.
Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act - The New York Times
There Were 5-Hour Lines to Vote in Arizona Because the Supreme Court Gutted the Voting Rights Act
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.
Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.
There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
Arizona is an early voting state. Anyone can request a ballot by mail.
By all means, please list all the incidents of fraud in those two states and compare them to fraud in other states.
So 30 minutes is the max, according to you?What is the maximum time to vote, jerkface?Anybody who thinks waiting 5 hours to vote is okay...is a fucked up asshole.
I've never had anyone waiting more than 30 minutes in one of our universal polling places or more than an hour at a precinct polling place.
You think a five hour wait to vote is acceptable?
No, it's because Republicans hate blacks and Hispanics and want to disenfranchise them. And Bush lied us into war with Iraq. Get it right!Yeah, that's it. That's just what they did in the deep South when Jim Crow was the Auditor down there 'cause that's how they got the "undesirables" to not vote with those longggggggg lines. Why Hell, your just as sharp as a bad B&W picture tube on a 1954 Admiral 17" console TV, lad!I can tell you didn't vote in Maricopa County, AZ yesterday. With only 60 polling places in a county with ~21,000 to vote in each of the 1.25 million registered voters in the county, it was just a bit CROWDED where we voted. It was early, but we still had over an hour wait. When we came out the line had about doubled. If the Auditor, et al, pull the same shit for the General election in November, it will definitely impact the turnout.Just a question---------> If the intent was to suppress with long lines, exactly how did they know who they were suppressing? Not only that, but since it is a closed primary with no crossover allowed, exactly how did this affect Democrats more than the GOP?
I heard on the news last night that some polling places closer in toward Phoenix proper had 5 + hour wait times. This never would have happened if SCOTUS hadn't have red lined Section V of the Voting Rights Act. It would have brought the DOJ down on the State given this was a specific tactic use in the Tom Crow era to curb voting by "undesirables". Arizona got tagged for this same shit back in the '70's, so they know how it works.
So then, somehow the undesirables had to wait in line longer than the desirable people. Explain how that is enforced.
Going from over 200 polling places in 2012 down to 60 today (after SCOTUS hacked away at Section V of the VRA in 2013) with the shitty public transportation here in this very, very large County is going to work hardships on folks with limited transport options, and that's just one issue. Must be too fucking hard for you to comprehend, coming from Inbreed, Indiana.
I guess you have an issue with enabling every ELIGIBLE voter to exercise their franchise without gov'mint obstruction!
It had nothing to do with the Supreme Courts ruling.
It had everything to do with the Maricopa County elections officials who made the decision.
This is their decision and theirs alone. No one else.
Purcell said it was because they did not have the money.
Maricopa County elections officials reduced polling places to 60 to save money - Cronkite News - Arizona PBS
So if anyone could request a ballot by mail wtf are you griping about?Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.
Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.
There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
Arizona is an early voting state. Anyone can request a ballot by mail.
By all means, please list all the incidents of fraud in those two states and compare them to fraud in other states.
So if anyone could request a ballot by mail wtf are you griping about?Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.Wait, so invalidating those parts resulted in voter suppression which led to long lines at the polls?
Seriously?
YOu are truly the biggest dumbshit on this site.
Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.
There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
Arizona is an early voting state. Anyone can request a ballot by mail.
By all means, please list all the incidents of fraud in those two states and compare them to fraud in other states.
So 30 minutes is the max, according to you?What is the maximum time to vote, jerkface?Anybody who thinks waiting 5 hours to vote is okay...is a fucked up asshole.
I've never had anyone waiting more than 30 minutes in one of our universal polling places or more than an hour at a precinct polling place.
You think a five hour wait to vote is acceptable?
So if anyone could request a ballot by mail wtf are you griping about?Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.Yes, that is exactly why Maricopa County, Arizona was allowed to eliminate numerous polling locations without prior approval/oversight from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Most counties surveyed by The Arizona Republic had enough polling places to average 2,500 or fewer eligible voters per polling site. Maricopa County had only one site per every 21,000 voters.
There Was 1 Polling Site For Every 21,000 People In Maricopa County, Arizona
That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
Arizona is an early voting state. Anyone can request a ballot by mail.
By all means, please list all the incidents of fraud in those two states and compare them to fraud in other states.
They don't have to if they don't want to. Some people like going to the polls to vote.
If you're going to replace 724 polling places with 60 UPPs, you need to have mailed every voter a ballot.
They could have served as a model instead of the disaster it turned out as.
So if anyone could request a ballot by mail wtf are you griping about?Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
Arizona is an early voting state. Anyone can request a ballot by mail.
By all means, please list all the incidents of fraud in those two states and compare them to fraud in other states.
They don't have to if they don't want to. Some people like going to the polls to vote.
If you're going to replace 724 polling places with 60 UPPs, you need to have mailed every voter a ballot.
They could have served as a model instead of the disaster it turned out as.
What good is that when you don't even receive them in the mail?
Yeah, that's it. That's just what they did in the deep South when Jim Crow was the Auditor down there 'cause that's how they got the "undesirables" to not vote with those longggggggg lines. Why Hell, your just as sharp as a bad B&W picture tube on a 1954 Admiral 17" console TV, lad!I can tell you didn't vote in Maricopa County, AZ yesterday. With only 60 polling places in a county with ~21,000 to vote in each of the 1.25 million registered voters in the county, it was just a bit CROWDED where we voted. It was early, but we still had over an hour wait. When we came out the line had about doubled. If the Auditor, et al, pull the same shit for the General election in November, it will definitely impact the turnout.
I heard on the news last night that some polling places closer in toward Phoenix proper had 5 + hour wait times. This never would have happened if SCOTUS hadn't have red lined Section V of the Voting Rights Act. It would have brought the DOJ down on the State given this was a specific tactic use in the Tom Crow era to curb voting by "undesirables". Arizona got tagged for this same shit back in the '70's, so they know how it works.
So then, somehow the undesirables had to wait in line longer than the desirable people. Explain how that is enforced.
Going from over 200 polling places in 2012 down to 60 today (after SCOTUS hacked away at Section V of the VRA in 2013) with the shitty public transportation here in this very, very large County is going to work hardships on folks with limited transport options, and that's just one issue. Must be too fucking hard for you to comprehend, coming from Inbreed, Indiana.
I guess you have an issue with enabling every ELIGIBLE voter to exercise their franchise without gov'mint obstruction!
It had nothing to do with the Supreme Courts ruling.
It had everything to do with the Maricopa County elections officials who made the decision.
This is their decision and theirs alone. No one else.
Purcell said it was because they did not have the money.
Maricopa County elections officials reduced polling places to 60 to save money - Cronkite News - Arizona PBS
It had nothing to do with the Supreme Courts ruling.
It has everything to do with it. They would not have been permitted to close that many locations if tha part of the voting rights act were intact. This is at least the third or fourth time it's been explained.
Then why did so many not get their early mail in ballots throughout the whole State and was forced to go to the polling stations?
Is that also because of the court? No it was not.
So if anyone could request a ballot by mail wtf are you griping about?Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.That's a disingenuous stat. Those 60 locations were universal polling places which unlike local polling places, should be able to provide ballots to any voter in the county.
It was still a stupid move by Maricopa to try this in a Presidential Primary and without mailing every voter a ballot like they do in Denver or Oregon.
Arizona is an early voting state. Anyone can request a ballot by mail.
By all means, please list all the incidents of fraud in those two states and compare them to fraud in other states.
They don't have to if they don't want to. Some people like going to the polls to vote.
If you're going to replace 724 polling places with 60 UPPs, you need to have mailed every voter a ballot.
They could have served as a model instead of the disaster it turned out as.
What good is that when you don't even receive them in the mail?
Yeah, that's it. That's just what they did in the deep South when Jim Crow was the Auditor down there 'cause that's how they got the "undesirables" to not vote with those longggggggg lines. Why Hell, your just as sharp as a bad B&W picture tube on a 1954 Admiral 17" console TV, lad!So then, somehow the undesirables had to wait in line longer than the desirable people. Explain how that is enforced.
Going from over 200 polling places in 2012 down to 60 today (after SCOTUS hacked away at Section V of the VRA in 2013) with the shitty public transportation here in this very, very large County is going to work hardships on folks with limited transport options, and that's just one issue. Must be too fucking hard for you to comprehend, coming from Inbreed, Indiana.
I guess you have an issue with enabling every ELIGIBLE voter to exercise their franchise without gov'mint obstruction!
It had nothing to do with the Supreme Courts ruling.
It had everything to do with the Maricopa County elections officials who made the decision.
This is their decision and theirs alone. No one else.
Purcell said it was because they did not have the money.
Maricopa County elections officials reduced polling places to 60 to save money - Cronkite News - Arizona PBS
It had nothing to do with the Supreme Courts ruling.
It has everything to do with it. They would not have been permitted to close that many locations if tha part of the voting rights act were intact. This is at least the third or fourth time it's been explained.
Then why did so many not get their early mail in ballots throughout the whole State and was forced to go to the polling stations?
Is that also because of the court? No it was not.
Huh?
So if anyone could request a ballot by mail wtf are you griping about?Doubtless they were concerned with fraud, unlike Denver and Oregon where they welcome it.
Arizona is an early voting state. Anyone can request a ballot by mail.
By all means, please list all the incidents of fraud in those two states and compare them to fraud in other states.
They don't have to if they don't want to. Some people like going to the polls to vote.
If you're going to replace 724 polling places with 60 UPPs, you need to have mailed every voter a ballot.
They could have served as a model instead of the disaster it turned out as.
What good is that when you don't even receive them in the mail?
I can't find any news articles about a lot of people not getting their ballots in the mail. Got a link?
