Arpaio GUILTY of targeting Latinos

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Funny how Obama went from being the most intellectual President we ever had, to a complete dunce who supposedly doesn't even know what his own appointees and agencies are doing.

How many of the Hussein's stooges have to get caught red-handed breaking the law and abusing their power before you connect the dots?

I keep asking people to show me where Obama broke the law or Obama engaged in any wrongdoing and every time I get another song and dance like you just gave me.

I guess you also believe Hitler never authorized the "Final Solution" for Jews, because there is no writen order by him for it, and there is no other direct evidence he knew about it.

But we know about it because he preached against them, his underlings carried out his wishes, and result was millions of Jews died.

Obama slams the right every time he opens his mouth, his partisan hacks placed throughout every branch of government persecute them, and rob them of their rights. But hey there is no written Executive Order so he is innocent.

Liberal logic....gotta love it.

Hitler?

You’ve got to be kidding.

 

[Dot Com]

Issa (R) needs to hold hearings on this now!!!

 

[depotoo]

The head of the IRS was a Bush appointee.

in which he has only ever donated to the DNC. See what bi-partisanship gets ya?

You should note that above the other poster is claiming that Obama PUT the people in the IRS who did whatever wrong was supposedly done.

Is that poster correct, or full of shit?

Sounds like you are putting irrelevant importance on the word PUT.

It depends on the outcome of the investigation, by whom, when, and where it started.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Issa (R) needs to hold hearings on this now!!!

Why?

We all know damn well that 95% of the illegals are Latinos. This tells me that you are in support of open borders. Globalist.

 

[HomeInspect]

You know darn well, the hammer will fall on anyone who messes with undocumented democrat takers

 

[ScienceRocks]

You know darn well, the hammer will fall on anyone who messes with undocumented democrat takers

Yep,

We're heading towards a EU body as the powers to be with the leftist want a world government. They want a free movement zone to force this on us.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Are you saying it's OK for a Republican Sheriff to target a group of Americans that vote for Democrats 71% of the time?
.

No, it's ok for a Republican Sheriff to target illegals and send them back..Since they are not legal in the first place, they can't vote.

How is it known they’re ‘illegal’?

Have any been found guilty of being in the country undocumented in a court of law?

Is Arpaio now prosecutor, judge, and jury in addition to being sheriff?

At 142 pages, the decision is peppered with stinging criticism of the policies and practices espoused by Sheriff Arpaio, who Judge Snow said had turned much of his focus to arresting immigrants who were in the country illegally, in most cases civil violations, at the expense of fighting crimes.

He said the sheriff relied on racial profiling and illegal detentions to target Latinos, using their ethnicity as the main basis for suspecting they were in the country illegally. Many of the people targeted were American citizens or legal residents.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/25/u...ons-of-rights-by-sheriff-joe-arpaio.html?_r=0

Not only is the policy illegal and un-Constitutional, but it even failed to realize its racist goal.

OH PLEASE spare us with your racial bullshit. When was profiling unconstitutional?

What planet do you live on?

he's targeting them, because they're likely to be illegal

see it's the same reason when a woman gets raped, you look for a dude, could it be a woman sure, but you go with logic and reason first.

 

[ScienceRocks]

No, it's ok for a Republican Sheriff to target illegals and send them back..Since they are not legal in the first place, they can't vote.

How is it known they’re ‘illegal’?

Have any been found guilty of being in the country undocumented in a court of law?

Is Arpaio now prosecutor, judge, and jury in addition to being sheriff?

At 142 pages, the decision is peppered with stinging criticism of the policies and practices espoused by Sheriff Arpaio, who Judge Snow said had turned much of his focus to arresting immigrants who were in the country illegally, in most cases civil violations, at the expense of fighting crimes.

He said the sheriff relied on racial profiling and illegal detentions to target Latinos, using their ethnicity as the main basis for suspecting they were in the country illegally. Many of the people targeted were American citizens or legal residents.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/25/u...ons-of-rights-by-sheriff-joe-arpaio.html?_r=0

Not only is the policy illegal and un-Constitutional, but it even failed to realize its racist goal.

OH PLEASE spare us with your racial bullshit. When was profiling unconstitutional?

What planet do you live on?

he's targeting them, because they're likely to be illegal

see it's the same reason when a woman gets raped, you look for a dude, could it be a woman sure, but you go with logic and reason first.

Logic screams that you can't have globalism. The leftist have dropped any means of logic or sense.

 

[theHawk]

I would think an Arizona Driver's license is enough proof that they are legal since it is very difficult to create a fake ID. There should be no reason to detain them after they run their plates, ID and registration through their computers in their patrol cars.

The problem we had here in Arizona is that they didn't care that so many illegals came across the border for years until a law passed that employers would get fined if they hired them. That is when Arpaio got into his crusade to deport them. Police here all have bad attitudes and they profile everyone they come in contact with and they are known for police brutality.

There are so many people that fear Arpaio in his own administration that I can't wait for the day he finally resigns and the truth comes out of all the corruption that Arpaio has done for years and gotten away with it.

LOL, they are "known for police brutality". You're so full of shit. Holder has sent his goon squad to try and trump up charges on Apario, it failed. If there is so much wrongdoing going on, he would of been taken by the Feds by now.

Apario has always driven liberals nuts. I remember when he first started putting criminals in pink underwear and using them in chain gangs, and housing them in tents even in summer. The D-bags cried and cried for the poor criminals. Luckily libs were always a minority in AZ.

That meets the criteria for cruel and unusal punishment.

LOL, bleeding heart liberal, right on queue.

 

[Snookie]

No, it's ok for a Republican Sheriff to target illegals and send them back..Since they are not legal in the first place, they can't vote.

How is it known they’re ‘illegal’?

Have any been found guilty of being in the country undocumented in a court of law?

Is Arpaio now prosecutor, judge, and jury in addition to being sheriff?

At 142 pages, the decision is peppered with stinging criticism of the policies and practices espoused by Sheriff Arpaio, who Judge Snow said had turned much of his focus to arresting immigrants who were in the country illegally, in most cases civil violations, at the expense of fighting crimes.

He said the sheriff relied on racial profiling and illegal detentions to target Latinos, using their ethnicity as the main basis for suspecting they were in the country illegally. Many of the people targeted were American citizens or legal residents.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/25/u...ons-of-rights-by-sheriff-joe-arpaio.html?_r=0

Not only is the policy illegal and un-Constitutional, but it even failed to realize its racist goal.

OH PLEASE spare us with your racial bullshit. When was profiling unconstitutional?

What planet do you live on?

he's targeting them, because they're likely to be illegal

see it's the same reason when a woman gets raped, you look for a dude, could it be a woman sure, but you go with logic and reason first.

Why not? It works in China.

 

[Snookie]

LOL, they are "known for police brutality". You're so full of shit. Holder has sent his goon squad to try and trump up charges on Apario, it failed. If there is so much wrongdoing going on, he would of been taken by the Feds by now.

Apario has always driven liberals nuts. I remember when he first started putting criminals in pink underwear and using them in chain gangs, and housing them in tents even in summer. The D-bags cried and cried for the poor criminals. Luckily libs were always a minority in AZ.

That meets the criteria for cruel and unusal punishment.

LOL, bleeding heart liberal, right on queue.

As per the US Constitution.

However you cons don't let that get in your way, do you?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

No, it's ok for a Republican Sheriff to target illegals and send them back..Since they are not legal in the first place, they can't vote.

How is it known they’re ‘illegal’?

Have any been found guilty of being in the country undocumented in a court of law?

Is Arpaio now prosecutor, judge, and jury in addition to being sheriff?

At 142 pages, the decision is peppered with stinging criticism of the policies and practices espoused by Sheriff Arpaio, who Judge Snow said had turned much of his focus to arresting immigrants who were in the country illegally, in most cases civil violations, at the expense of fighting crimes.

He said the sheriff relied on racial profiling and illegal detentions to target Latinos, using their ethnicity as the main basis for suspecting they were in the country illegally. Many of the people targeted were American citizens or legal residents.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/25/u...ons-of-rights-by-sheriff-joe-arpaio.html?_r=0

Not only is the policy illegal and un-Constitutional, but it even failed to realize its racist goal.

OH PLEASE spare us with your racial bullshit. When was profiling unconstitutional?

What planet do you live on?

he's targeting them, because they're likely to be illegal

see it's the same reason when a woman gets raped, you look for a dude, could it be a woman sure, but you go with logic and reason first.

And the fact that you fail to understand why that’s un-Constitutional is telling.

 

[theHawk]

Aren't the Arpaio defenders here the same ones who think background checks to purchase firearms are unconstitutional?

We shoudn't need background checks for firearms, if we keep criminals and the mentally insane locked up.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How is it known they’re ‘illegal’?

Have any been found guilty of being in the country undocumented in a court of law?

Is Arpaio now prosecutor, judge, and jury in addition to being sheriff?


Not only is the policy illegal and un-Constitutional, but it even failed to realize its racist goal.

OH PLEASE spare us with your racial bullshit. When was profiling unconstitutional?

What planet do you live on?

he's targeting them, because they're likely to be illegal

see it's the same reason when a woman gets raped, you look for a dude, could it be a woman sure, but you go with logic and reason first.

Logic screams that you can't have globalism. The leftist have dropped any means of logic or sense.

This post is devoid of any logic or sense.

The County’s un-Constitutional policy has nothing to do with ‘globalism,’ whatever that’s supposed to mean.

 

[theHawk]

The head of the IRS was a Bush appointee.

in which he has only ever donated to the DNC. See what bi-partisanship gets ya?

You should note that above the other poster is claiming that Obama PUT the people in the IRS who did whatever wrong was supposedly done.

Is that poster correct, or full of shit?

His partisan hacks, liberals, are all throughout government. He doesn't have to place them there personally. They are loyal to the cause and will abuse their power to attack their opposition.

Or are you trying to argue that Republicans, including a Bush appointee, are the ones deliberately targeting Tea Party groups?

 

[theHawk]

I keep asking people to show me where Obama broke the law or Obama engaged in any wrongdoing and every time I get another song and dance like you just gave me.

I guess you also believe Hitler never authorized the "Final Solution" for Jews, because there is no writen order by him for it, and there is no other direct evidence he knew about it.

But we know about it because he preached against them, his underlings carried out his wishes, and result was millions of Jews died.

Obama slams the right every time he opens his mouth, his partisan hacks placed throughout every branch of government persecute them, and rob them of their rights. But hey there is no written Executive Order so he is innocent.

Liberal logic....gotta love it.

Hitler?

You’ve got to be kidding.

Well Clay, he is trying to argue that unless there is direct evidence connecting wrongdoing, the Dear Leader is absolved of all responsibility, even if there is overwhelming evidence of corrpution within the government controlled by that leader.
Hitler is just an example, but the point is valid.

 

[Snookie]

Aren't the Arpaio defenders here the same ones who think background checks to purchase firearms are unconstitutional?

We shoudn't need background checks for firearms, if we keep criminals and the mentally insane locked up.

It worked for hitler...for a while.

 

[edthecynic]

The head of the IRS was a Bush appointee.

in which he has only ever donated to the DNC. See what bi-partisanship gets ya?

You should note that above the other poster is claiming that Obama PUT the people in the IRS who did whatever wrong was supposedly done.

Is that poster correct, or full of shit?

You have to understand these mindless drones are not capable of thinking for themselves. Their MessiahRushie told them that Obama appointed everybody in the IRS because they all think like him and do not need to be told to harass CON$. So it does not matter that not one person involved in the IRS scandal was hired by Obama, they were all hired to do Obama's bidding without even being told to do it.

May 15, 1013
RUSH: Every Obama appointee and every Obama career person in these positions is from the same mold as Obama. They are there to wage war against their enemies... The IRS, that's a plum spot to engage in partisan political warfare against the enemies of whatever you want to call it... All he has to do is what he did: Put like-minded people in these positions.

RUSH: The IRS was doing exactly what they wanted 'em to do. So on what grounds does somebody there get fired?
They were simply following orders -- and if no direct orders were given, they didn't have to be given. The people who were hired are already motivated, are already activated to behave in this manner. That's why they're hired! They're hired because they don't need to be told. They're hired because they already qualify. They don't need instruction in hating conservatism. They don't need to be told how to thwart 527s and 501(c)(3)s and (4)s. They don't have to be told how to harass. They don't have to be told how to bully.
They don't have to be told how to stonewall. They don't have to be told how to deny applications. They're perfectly capable of it on their own. That's why they're in their positions in the first place.*

 

[Dot Com]

why are conservatives targeting people? WHY?!!!

 

[Nova78]

Arpaio GUILTY of targeting Latinos

Obama has been out to get Joe since he came to office , cause Joe does not give rats ass about Obama and his bullshit policies, wish there more like Joe , then the Country would not be such a shit hole .............