As a Black voter, I find this offensive: ‘What about 9/11?’ Twitter furious after Biden calls Capitol storming ‘worst attack since Civil War"

Claiming something is a Constitutional Republic isn't mutually exclusive from being a Democracy....you do understand that right??
They can't stomach the word democracy for the same obvious reason that they love the word republic.

A pure democracy would be one of the worst forms of government ever. 50.00001% of the people deciding to kill you would result in you ending up dead.
You sound frightened. Have you really pissed off that many people?

If that concept doesn't frighten you, you are an idiot.
If the concept of democracy is frightening to you, you might consider leaving the country.

I'll help you pack.

The concept of a pure democracy with zero constitutional protections should scare anyone.

The mob is fickle.
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
Didn't you folks claim this country would be ruled by Sharia law by now??

Even tho you couldn't tell us the "tools and mechanisms" they could have applied to do that

No, your side is trying to rule it via your religion, "wokism" , which is far worse.

And you didn't answer my question.
That's because you ask stupid leading questions in an attempt to deflect the topic.

It's because you won't answer the question because you know your answer would either make you look like a hypocrite or an idiot.
Well that's bullshit.

Reality, bitch.
 
They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.
See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

furnished with weapons

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.
Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.

Words have meanings that are also interpreted by most people, and most people think "gun" when you call a person armed.
Your ignorance of the meaning doesn't change it.

Sorry for your luck.

Your attempt to imply an actual armed insurrection (meaning with firearms) when it clearly was a protest that got out of control (not even a riot, at most a mass trespass) doesn't mean that reality folds to make it an actual insurrection.
Well that's bullshit. Only in your head does armed = only guns.

Was the teenager with a knife that was just shot unarmed?

If someone attacks you with a baseball bat are you gonna tell the police he was unarmed?

It's amazing the unbelievable bullshit you kids will spew to defend criminals.

Armed with a knife. Armed with a bat. You guys just used armed to make it sound like they had firearms.

At best they were "Armed" with improvised weapons, and we all know that results in a -4 penalty to your attack rolls.
They were armed with hollow Aluminum flag poles and/or pepper spray.
 
Trump told them to peacefully protest, you left that part out.
He said it once after stoking their anger for months.

Weak and pathetic.

Here's a little hint, when it comes to our anger at SJW progressives we don't need Trump to make us angry.

And anger isn't a vice in the face of tyranny.
These guys weren’t angry about any “social justice”.

They were angry at losing an election. Violence to overturn an election or remove the voice of voters IS tyranny and that’s what the rioters were pushed to by his rhetoric.
 
Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.
If they were bent on overthrowing the government, they would have brought weapons. Either you're incredibly stupid ( which I don't think you are) or you're simply a partisan hack hell bent on creating strife and division in order to further the agenda of your chosen party. Only a true moron really thinks that crowds over running the Capital building was a targeted attempt to overthrow the government.
 
Trump told them to peacefully protest, you left that part out.
He said it once after stoking their anger for months.

Weak and pathetic.

Here's a little hint, when it comes to our anger at SJW progressives we don't need Trump to make us angry.

And anger isn't a vice in the face of tyranny.
These guys weren’t angry about any “social justice”.

They were angry at losing an election. Violence to overturn an election or remove the voice of voters IS tyranny and that’s what the rioters were pushed to by his rhetoric.
What a drama queen, ya really think they thought they where going to overturn an election by breaking in?
 
Trump told them to peacefully protest, you left that part out.
He said it once after stoking their anger for months.

Weak and pathetic.

Here's a little hint, when it comes to our anger at SJW progressives we don't need Trump to make us angry.

And anger isn't a vice in the face of tyranny.
These guys weren’t angry about any “social justice”.

They were angry at losing an election. Violence to overturn an election or remove the voice of voters IS tyranny and that’s what the rioters were pushed to by his rhetoric.

SJW's, the type that would steal an election if they could because in their minds they are right and the rest of us are evil.

Meanwhile actual government services were denied to a blocks wide area in ye olde CHOP, an ACTUAL insurrection, and you guys gloss over it.

One day vs. months.
 
What a drama queen, ya really think they thought they where going to overturn an election by breaking in?
Given the group was composed largely of fringe extremists with very questionable beliefs, yes I do think that they thought that. These people were not average individuals. They were the real crazies.
 
SJW's, the type that would steal an election if they could because in their minds they are right and the rest of us are evil.
Wow, talk about a stretch. This is a really pathetic attempt at justifying this behavior.

No one stole the election. The rioters are those who did attempt to steal the election because they thought they’re right and the rest of us are evil. The rioters are exactly the people who just described.
 
SJW's, the type that would steal an election if they could because in their minds they are right and the rest of us are evil.
Wow, talk about a stretch. This is a really pathetic attempt at justifying this behavior.

No one stole the election. The rioters are those who did attempt to steal the election because they thought they’re right and the rest of us are evil. The rioters are exactly the people who just described.

And if they did you wouldn't care because your side won.
 
Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.


Quid Pro and the Nazi party need the 1/6 Reichstag Fire to justify their war on civil rights.
 
And if they did you wouldn't care because your side won.
Is that the best you can do? “If”? We aren’t talking about what could have happened. We are talking about what DID happen.

You are using presumed offenses to justify real offenses.
 
Trump told them to peacefully protest, you left that part out.
He said it once after stoking their anger for months.

Weak and pathetic.

Here's a little hint, when it comes to our anger at SJW progressives we don't need Trump to make us angry.

And anger isn't a vice in the face of tyranny.
These guys weren’t angry about any “social justice”.

They were angry at losing an election. Violence to overturn an election or remove the voice of voters IS tyranny and that’s what the rioters were pushed to by his rhetoric.
I know it's difficult to believe but there are other reasons than skin color that merit public outrage. The admitted manipulation of the 2020 election ( The Time magazine expose on the conspiracy to elect Biden is not what you think it is (msn.com) ) and it's ramifications going forward certainly had the power to piss people off. If you think there wouldn't have been riots had Trump been able to overcome the election anomalies then you're lying to yourself. You know well that team Democrat would have been burning cities to protest the " voice of the voters".
 
Last edited:
And if they did you wouldn't care because your side won.
Is that the best you can do? “If”? We aren’t talking about what could have happened. We are talking about what DID happen.

You are using presumed offenses to justify real offenses.

We don't know what happened because no one in power wants to do a real investigations. All that has been done is audits of the same numbers counted over and over again.
 
We don't know what happened because no one in power wants to do a real investigations. All that has been done is audits of the same numbers counted over and over again.
Yes, we know what happened. Same thing that happens in every election. Votes were counted and a winner declared.

The only thing that was different this year was that we had a weak minded president who wanted to steal the election because in his mind he was right and the rest of us are evil. The results are his supporters storming the capitol in acts of violence for just that purpose.

The thing you think the other side could have been doing is being used to justify the things that your sided actually did.
 
Like you Nazis did in July when your Brown Shirts stormed the White House and tried to assassinate the President?

No one stormed the White House and tried to assassinate the president, but had they gotten anywhere close to them as these rioters did to Congress, assuredly the Secret Service would have used deadly force. Remember, the rioters on Jan 6th got to the last hallway before they were to reach the floor of the House where the members of Congress were sheltering. Had rioters gotten inside the White House and been just outside the Oval Office smashing windows, no doubt in anyone's mind shots would have been fired and no one would have said anything about it.

The 1/6 Reichstag Fire was a mostly peaceful demonstration, nothing more.

Tell that to the scores of cops who were beaten up by the "mostly peaceful" rioters.
 
We don't know what happened because no one in power wants to do a real investigations. All that has been done is audits of the same numbers counted over and over again.
Yes, we know what happened. Same thing that happens in every election. Votes were counted and a winner declared.

The only thing that was different this year was that we had a weak minded president who wanted to steal the election because in his mind he was right and the rest of us are evil. The results are his supporters storming the capitol in acts of violence for just that purpose.

The thing you think the other side could have been doing is being used to justify the things that your sided actually did.

th
 

Forum List

Back
Top