Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The second amendment protects on the firearms that can be used for military purpose. B52 and tactical nukes are not firearmsYeah, everyone should have tactical nukes and B52 bombers. Don't like the neighbors and their late night parties? Nuke the fuckers! HAHAHAHA! Tired of the Post Office leaving junk mail? Shoot them with a bazooka! Tired of traffic jams? Run over everyone in your M1 Abrams tank! Someone in your neighborhood has a messy lawn? Clean it up with a flamethrower!
But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?
See! Everyone once in a while, your prayers for a mass shooting just so you can push your anti-gun lunacy -are- answred!Would this have happened if guns were banned in the US?
Why would you assume that a law abiding citizen that carries doesn't have firearms training?
Is everyone who buys a gun required to undertake this training?
no
Is everyone who buys a gun required to undertake this training?
no
To carry conceal you have to take a firearms course in most states.
In Ohio, and several other states, no training is required for open carry.Is everyone who buys a gun required to undertake this training?
no
To carry conceal you have to take a firearms course in most states.
Many states and cities have bans on guns.When has our right to keep and bear arms ever been removed in America?I wonder why Australians didn't riot? Maybe we are more civilised and accepting of the laws?
It's a difference in culture. The right to bear arms is important in America because we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed. Americans are very sensitized to our right to defend ourselves.
Australians obviously have different culture, which isn't as opposed to oppression and dedicated to self-defense. To put it in context, consider if the Australian government outlawed sex with sheep. THEN you would riot, you know you would!
It was removed acress the entire US 1994-2004.How can we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed when it has never been removed?
Only because they were caught,.Welp!
ABC is apologizing that they tried to link the shooter to the Tea-Party.
The second amendment protects on the firearms that can be used for military purpose. B52 and tactical nukes are not firearms
But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?
What part of tank, RPG anti-aircraft guns 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads are not firearms and are not protected weapons under the second amendment do you not comprehend?
"Arms" as the term is used in the 2nd, has a specific definition.The second amendment protects on the firearms that can be used for military purpose. B52 and tactical nukes are not firearmsYeah, everyone should have tactical nukes and B52 bombers. Don't like the neighbors and their late night parties? Nuke the fuckers! HAHAHAHA! Tired of the Post Office leaving junk mail? Shoot them with a bazooka! Tired of traffic jams? Run over everyone in your M1 Abrams tank! Someone in your neighborhood has a messy lawn? Clean it up with a flamethrower!
But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?
Only because they were caught,.Welp!
ABC is apologizing that they tried to link the shooter to the Tea-Party.
I wonder why Australians didn't riot? Maybe we are more civilised and accepting of the laws?
It's a difference in culture. The right to bear arms is important in America because we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed. Americans are very sensitized to our right to defend ourselves.
Australians obviously have different culture, which isn't as opposed to oppression and dedicated to self-defense. To put it in context, consider if the Australian government outlawed sex with sheep. THEN you would riot, you know you would!
When has our right to keep and bear arms ever been removed in America? How can we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed when it has never been removed?
The USA and Australia have very similar roots as English colonies. They have a parliamentary democracy that is neither oppressive or pacifistic. I don't know where you get the notion that Australians are cowardly, sheep fucking, pacifists who roll over at the slightest threat.
More asnwered prayers!And, OF COURSE!
Here come the usual mindless liberals saying this proves we need to have gun control.
CNN's Piers Morgan Exploits 'Dark Knight' Tragedy To Push Leftist Agenda
Is everyone who buys a gun required to undertake this training?
no
To carry conceal you have to take a firearms course in most states.
To carry conceal you have to take a firearms course in most states.
But not to puchase.
But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?
What part of tank, RPG anti-aircraft guns 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads are not firearms and are not protected weapons under the second amendment do you not comprehend?
They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not. Do you think the average (or below average) citizen should be able to go around toting a M60 machinegun to Safeway to go shopping?
If ordinary citizens shouldn't be allowed to have B52 bombers, cruise missiles, M1 tanks, bunker buster bombs, etc, then how would they be able to overthrow the oppressive government when the government DOES have these weapons?
This is where I get pissed and start calling you a god damn fucking idiot. Idiot those weapons you mentioned are not god damn firearms.They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not.
What part of tank, RPG anti-aircraft guns 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads are not firearms and are not protected weapons under the second amendment do you not comprehend?
They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not. Do you think the average (or below average) citizen should be able to go around toting a M60 machinegun to Safeway to go shopping?
If ordinary citizens shouldn't be allowed to have B52 bombers, cruise missiles, M1 tanks, bunker buster bombs, etc, then how would they be able to overthrow the oppressive government when the government DOES have these weapons?This is where I get pissed and start calling you a god damn fucking idiot. Idiot those weapons you mentioned are not god damn firearms.They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not.