As many as 10 dead in shooting at Batman premiere in Denver: reports

Yeah, everyone should have tactical nukes and B52 bombers. Don't like the neighbors and their late night parties? Nuke the fuckers! HAHAHAHA! Tired of the Post Office leaving junk mail? Shoot them with a bazooka! Tired of traffic jams? Run over everyone in your M1 Abrams tank! Someone in your neighborhood has a messy lawn? Clean it up with a flamethrower!
The second amendment protects on the firearms that can be used for military purpose. B52 and tactical nukes are not firearms

But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?

What part of tank, RPG anti-aircraft guns 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads are not firearms and are not protected weapons under the second amendment do you not comprehend?
 
Welp!

ABC is apologizing that they tried to link the shooter to the Tea-Party.

Colorado shooting: ABC News draws possible James Holmes tea party connection - POLITICO.com

But it shows the political hackery of the liberal media that they searched Tea-Party roles, instead of Occupy or any other organization.

And they reported it, without ANY proof, the James Holmes on the roles was the SAME James Holmes (which it wasn't).

Disgusting!

Here goes another attempt by the liberal media to prove the Tea Party is violent, gone up in smoke.
 
I wonder why Australians didn't riot? Maybe we are more civilised and accepting of the laws?

It's a difference in culture. The right to bear arms is important in America because we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed. Americans are very sensitized to our right to defend ourselves.

Australians obviously have different culture, which isn't as opposed to oppression and dedicated to self-defense. To put it in context, consider if the Australian government outlawed sex with sheep. THEN you would riot, you know you would!
When has our right to keep and bear arms ever been removed in America?
Many states and cities have bans on guns.

How can we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed when it has never been removed?
It was removed acress the entire US 1994-2004.
 
The second amendment protects on the firearms that can be used for military purpose. B52 and tactical nukes are not firearms

But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?

What part of tank, RPG anti-aircraft guns 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads are not firearms and are not protected weapons under the second amendment do you not comprehend?

They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not. Do you think the average (or below average) citizen should be able to go around toting a M60 machinegun to Safeway to go shopping?

If ordinary citizens shouldn't be allowed to have B52 bombers, cruise missiles, M1 tanks, bunker buster bombs, etc, then how would they be able to overthrow the oppressive government when the government DOES have these weapons?
 
Yeah, everyone should have tactical nukes and B52 bombers. Don't like the neighbors and their late night parties? Nuke the fuckers! HAHAHAHA! Tired of the Post Office leaving junk mail? Shoot them with a bazooka! Tired of traffic jams? Run over everyone in your M1 Abrams tank! Someone in your neighborhood has a messy lawn? Clean it up with a flamethrower!
The second amendment protects on the firearms that can be used for military purpose. B52 and tactical nukes are not firearms

But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?
"Arms" as the term is used in the 2nd, has a specific definition.
All of the weapons you list, save for machineguns, fall outside that definition; all firearms fall under that definition.
 
Last edited:
Welp!

ABC is apologizing that they tried to link the shooter to the Tea-Party.
Only because they were caught,.

Damn right!

I watched it this morning at 8:00 a.m. George Stephanopolis stated claiming there was a link to the Tea Party.

"Oh Bullshit!" I yelled right at the TV. I knew it was crap. They tried the same thing with Jared Loughner and he turned out to be a big time leftist!

Damn libs! They keep trying to claim the Tea Party is racist and violent, while they turn a blind eye to the Occupy movement rapes, and other crimes.

It just really burns me up!
 
I wonder why Australians didn't riot? Maybe we are more civilised and accepting of the laws?

It's a difference in culture. The right to bear arms is important in America because we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed. Americans are very sensitized to our right to defend ourselves.

Australians obviously have different culture, which isn't as opposed to oppression and dedicated to self-defense. To put it in context, consider if the Australian government outlawed sex with sheep. THEN you would riot, you know you would!

When has our right to keep and bear arms ever been removed in America? How can we have a long history of oppression each time it is removed when it has never been removed?

The USA and Australia have very similar roots as English colonies. They have a parliamentary democracy that is neither oppressive or pacifistic. I don't know where you get the notion that Australians are cowardly, sheep fucking, pacifists who roll over at the slightest threat.

New Orleans Katrina
 
But you don't have a problem with just anyone having "equal military weapons"? Joe Blow with a 60 IQ should be able to have a tank, RPG, full auto machineguns, anti-aircraft guns, 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads? Where do you draw the line? Or is there a line?

What part of tank, RPG anti-aircraft guns 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads are not firearms and are not protected weapons under the second amendment do you not comprehend?

They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not. Do you think the average (or below average) citizen should be able to go around toting a M60 machinegun to Safeway to go shopping?

If ordinary citizens shouldn't be allowed to have B52 bombers, cruise missiles, M1 tanks, bunker buster bombs, etc, then how would they be able to overthrow the oppressive government when the government DOES have these weapons?
They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not.
This is where I get pissed and start calling you a god damn fucking idiot. Idiot those weapons you mentioned are not god damn firearms.
 
What part of tank, RPG anti-aircraft guns 16" 50 cal Naval bag guns with nuclear shells or Sarin gas warheads are not firearms and are not protected weapons under the second amendment do you not comprehend?

They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not. Do you think the average (or below average) citizen should be able to go around toting a M60 machinegun to Safeway to go shopping?

If ordinary citizens shouldn't be allowed to have B52 bombers, cruise missiles, M1 tanks, bunker buster bombs, etc, then how would they be able to overthrow the oppressive government when the government DOES have these weapons?
They are all military firearms. Maybe it would be easier if YOU clarify exactly what kind of "equal military firearms" are acceptable and what is not.
This is where I get pissed and start calling you a god damn fucking idiot. Idiot those weapons you mentioned are not god damn firearms.

You think libs know the difference.

Like Ann Coulter said, they are afraid of anything above a squirt gun.
 

Forum List

Back
Top