Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How a civilian can buy a semi automatic legally, and 6000 rounds defies logic.
16000 gun related deaths in USA compared to 20 a year in Japan where guns are banned.
The fewer the guns, the less the violence.
It's not impossible to control guns - but Americans are determined to protect handgun freedoms.
The pro-gun types will say it is not the presence or absence of guns that matters.. that is true up to a point, it's how guns are treated, which fundamentally starts with how seriously the culture views gun control.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedIt's not impossible to control guns - but Americans are determined to protect handgun freedoms.
That is true, which is why I don't truly want Americans to ban guns entirely. It punishes those who are responsible. What I would like to see, though, is tougher gun laws. Those who are responsible shouldn't have an issue with this - it is important to do everything you can to prevent firearms from ending up in the wrong hands.
Here is your first misconception, what you want does not matter. You do not have any valid opinion on the laws in the united states.
We get rid of one knuckle dragger on SCOTUS. Heller is overturned. We can introduce gun laws with teeth.
Sounds like a plan to me.
Here is your first misconception, what you want does not matter. You do not have any valid opinion on the laws in the united states.
We get rid of one knuckle dragger on SCOTUS. Heller is overturned. We can introduce gun laws with teeth.
Sounds like a plan to me.
Your plan is flawed, you have people like me that refuse your tyranny
How a civilian can buy a semi automatic legally, and 6000 rounds defies logic.
16000 gun related deaths in USA compared to 20 a year in Japan where guns are banned.
The fewer the guns, the less the violence.
It's not impossible to control guns - but Americans are determined to protect handgun freedoms.
The pro-gun types will say it is not the presence or absence of guns that matters.. that is true up to a point, it's how guns are treated, which fundamentally starts with how seriously the culture views gun control.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedIt's not impossible to control guns - but Americans are determined to protect handgun freedoms.
Somehow, I don't think the Founding Slaveowners had James HOlmes buying an AR-15 and 3000 rounds of 5.56 in mind when they said, "well-regulated militia".
I think they thought of a militia with an organizational charts and ranks and regulations and such, so they didn't have the crazy person shooting stuff up...
Now, if they said, "The right to own guns to compensate for tiny penises shall not be infringed", you might actually have an argument there.
Somehow, I don't think the Founding Slaveowners had James HOlmes buying an AR-15 and 3000 rounds of 5.56 in mind when they said, "well-regulated militia".
Now, if they said, "The right to own guns to compensate for tiny penises shall not be infringed", you might actually have an argument there.
We get rid of one knuckle dragger on SCOTUS. Heller is overturned. We can introduce gun laws with teeth.
Sounds like a plan to me.
Your plan is flawed, you have people like me that refuse your tyranny
And the sooner the ATF takes you out of circulation, the better.
Hey, guy, I frankly don't want to share my streets with gun-weilding crazy people. I'm not sure why you do.
My value is in my right to defend myself. Gun control only inhibits law abiding citizens, not criminals.I place more value on my right to own a gun because I know myself and I know that I won't commit a crime. If I'm attacked and I'm armed, I have a reasonable chance of defending myself. There is already a reasonable level of gun control. Felons and psychs aren't allowed to possess them. Any further restriction is only going to inhibit law abiding citizens like me, not the crooks. They'll have all the guns they want.
So your 'right' to own a gun is far more important than preventing innocent people from being killed? Is it okay for innocent people to be killed so long as they don't take your gun away?
I cannot agree with that at all.
How a civilian can buy a semi automatic legally, and 6000 rounds defies logic.
16000 gun related deaths in USA compared to 20 a year in Japan where guns are banned.
The fewer the guns, the less the violence.
It's not impossible to control guns - but Americans are determined to protect handgun freedoms.
The pro-gun types will say it is not the presence or absence of guns that matters.. that is true up to a point, it's how guns are treated, which fundamentally starts with how seriously the culture views gun control.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedIt's not impossible to control guns - but Americans are determined to protect handgun freedoms.
Somehow, I don't think the Founding Slaveowners had James HOlmes buying an AR-15 and 3000 rounds of 5.56 in mind when they said, "well-regulated militia".
I think they thought of a militia with an organizational charts and ranks and regulations and such, so they didn't have the crazy person shooting stuff up...
Now, if they said, "The right to own guns to compensate for tiny penises shall not be infringed", you might actually have an argument there.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Somehow, I don't think the Founding Slaveowners had James HOlmes buying an AR-15 and 3000 rounds of 5.56 in mind when they said, "well-regulated militia".
I think they thought of a militia with an organizational charts and ranks and regulations and such, so they didn't have the crazy person shooting stuff up...
Now, if they said, "The right to own guns to compensate for tiny penises shall not be infringed", you might actually have an argument there.
Somehow, I don't think the Founding Slaveowners had James HOlmes buying an AR-15 and 3000 rounds of 5.56 in mind when they said, "well-regulated militia".
Somehow I don't think the founders would have thought we would have had so many restrictive laws in our legal system today.
Now, if they said, "The right to own guns to compensate for tiny penises shall not be infringed", you might actually have an argument there.
You're an idiot
Your plan is flawed, you have people like me that refuse your tyranny
And the sooner the ATF takes you out of circulation, the better.
Hey, guy, I frankly don't want to share my streets with gun-weilding crazy people. I'm not sure why you do.
I hope you never see the light of another day and I hope it's done by knife.
What reason was that? Oh right, you implied gun owners all across the country have it in them to start their own random shooting sprees.
You're one sick fuck.
did i say that?....or did i say if the Govt comes for the guns there will be a few shootings....your one dumbass Cow....just like the real ones....here let me make you feel at home.........Mooooooo......
A few? You said a record number of mass shootings. You were very clear. Where would you shoot up?
did i say that?....or did i say if the Govt comes for the guns there will be a few shootings....your one dumbass Cow....just like the real ones....here let me make you feel at home....
A few? You said a record number of mass shootings. You were very clear. Where would you shoot up?
hey dumbass.....there are gun owners here who seem to be pretty goddamned serious about their guns.....and this includes Democrats......if they came one day to collect them and there were a FEW massacres on that day......it would be a record.....would it not?.....and it would no doubt spur a few more afterwards......try to keep up Cow.....it aint that hard,even Franco is capable of that....
That is true, which is why I don't truly want Americans to ban guns entirely. It punishes those who are responsible. What I would like to see, though, is tougher gun laws. Those who are responsible shouldn't have an issue with this - it is important to do everything you can to prevent firearms from ending up in the wrong hands.
How do you do that without infringing on the rights of innocent people? It's already illegal to own a firearm if you're a convicted felon or have a sufficient psychiatric history. The guy in the theater shooting had no prior criminal or psychiatric history. There's already a national database where a gun store can run an instant background check on you. This guy passed it because he had a clean record with no priors.
The only thing more that can be done is to make thought-crime illegal.
Only talking about our country, it's easy to own a gun.
You have to do a short lesson on gun safety - about 2 hours as I recall.
Then you're free to go.
You have to show your license whenever you buy a gun or ammunition.
There is no register of how many or what guns you own - a law that was changed about 25 years ago.
However, if you want to own a handgun or an automatic (and I think military style firearms as well) then you need to register as a collector which imposes a whole heap of extra checks and responsibilities.
Carrying a weapon in a public place without good cause is an offence.
Carrying a weapon of any sort for self-defence is an offence.
Using or presenting a gun for self defence in any situation will result in a trial.
So, we don't consider our liberties are curtailed because we can own a gun for sporting reasons, which is the only real reason that I can think of for owning one in New Zealand.
Carrying a weapon of any sort for self-defence is an offence.
Using or presenting a gun for self defence in any situation will result in a trial.
my expressed desire?.....your about as stupid as Cow is....you two should form a duo....What reason was that? Oh right, you implied gun owners all across the country have it in them to start their own random shooting sprees.
You're one sick fuck.
did i say that?....or did i say if the Govt comes for the guns there will be a few shootings....your one dumbass Cow....just like the real ones....here let me make you feel at home....
"The Government" is not a monolith, citizens like you comprise the employed thereof. No one could "take away" all weapons in the US, and your expressed desire to kill, less than a day after a mass shooting spree slaughter, is horrific.
That is true, which is why I don't truly want Americans to ban guns entirely. It punishes those who are responsible. What I would like to see, though, is tougher gun laws. Those who are responsible shouldn't have an issue with this - it is important to do everything you can to prevent firearms from ending up in the wrong hands.
Here is your first misconception, what you want does not matter. You do not have any valid opinion on the laws in the united states.
We get rid of one knuckle dragger on SCOTUS. Heller is overturned. We can introduce gun laws with teeth.
Sounds like a plan to me.
did i say that?....or did i say if the Govt comes for the guns there will be a few shootings....your one dumbass Cow....just like the real ones....here let me make you feel at home....
"The Government" is not a monolith, citizens like you comprise the employed thereof. No one could "take away" all weapons in the US, and your expressed desire to kill, less than a day after a mass shooting spree slaughter, is horrific.
If that's what you got from his statement then you are fucked up beyond belief.....
And the sooner the ATF takes you out of circulation, the better.
Hey, guy, I frankly don't want to share my streets with gun-weilding crazy people. I'm not sure why you do.
I hope you never see the light of another day and I hope it's done by knife.
Wow, threatening violence, eh?
Honestly, it seems that we have this gun craziness in this country, which other countries just find bizarre or strange.
It might have been a situation where I could not get a safe shot off and wouldn't have been able to try, but I'd like to know that I at least had a fair chance to defend myself.
A fair chance to hit other patrons too... including those in adjacent theatre rooms, like he did.
You obviously didn't read what I said.
A few? You said a record number of mass shootings. You were very clear. Where would you shoot up?
hey dumbass.....there are gun owners here who seem to be pretty goddamned serious about their guns.....and this includes Democrats......if they came one day to collect them and there were a FEW massacres on that day......it would be a record.....would it not?.....and it would no doubt spur a few more afterwards......try to keep up Cow.....it aint that hard,even Franco is capable of that....
No one is talking about confiscating guns.
But how about making it harder for crazy people to buy them?
A few? You said a record number of mass shootings. You were very clear. Where would you shoot up?
hey dumbass.....there are gun owners here who seem to be pretty goddamned serious about their guns.....and this includes Democrats......if they came one day to collect them and there were a FEW massacres on that day......it would be a record.....would it not?.....and it would no doubt spur a few more afterwards......try to keep up Cow.....it aint that hard,even Franco is capable of that....
No one is talking about confiscating guns.
But how about making it harder for crazy people to buy them?
Here is your first misconception, what you want does not matter. You do not have any valid opinion on the laws in the united states.
We get rid of one knuckle dragger on SCOTUS. Heller is overturned. We can introduce gun laws with teeth.
Sounds like a plan to me.
Stalin and Hitler would have loved that plan. Their type of government is exactly what your plan would put us on the path to.
